Anonymous ID: c75c6b Manipulating language again... July 26, 2020, 1:24 p.m. No.10084671   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4723

>>10081050

 

Also: https://wearethene.ws/notable/125054

 

Anyone else notice the trend in labeling rape as "sex" in articles?

 

In the Navy Times article linked to on the page above: "While Keago was on active duty in February 2018 and October 2018, he went into two midshipmen's room and had sex with them while they slept…"

 

It's not "sex" if you force yourself on unconscious women. It's rape.

 

This is NOT an isolated case. They have been doing this in articles referencing men raping women and men raping children. More and more often, they're calling it "sex" with a child rather than rape, abuse, or assault.

 

Think about it for a moment… Can you "have sex" with a child? A toddler? An infant? No. That's not possible. They cannot consent. Can you "have sex" with a woman who's unconscious and can't consent? No. In these cases, it's not "sex." It's rape. It's assault. It's abuse.

 

Why would they do this?

 

Because they're sick fucks and want to make rape seem okay. So, they don't call it rape, they call it "sex." This is just another step in them manipulating people into thinking that them abusing women and children is okay.

 

It's not okay. It will never be okay.

 

Know your enemy. Playing with language is what they do.

 

Some examples:

 

  • Changing the word "woman" to include deluded males.

  • Changing the word "man" to include deluded females.

  • Changing the word "marriage" to something state-determined rather than a religious institution.

  • Changing the word "moral" to refer to solely liberal/progressive ideology.

  • Changing the word "education" to refer to indoctrination.

 

I could go on, but hopefully you get the point. Kudos to WeAreTheNe.ws for using the right language on their post. Don't let [them] turn your language into something that excuses perversion. Stay alert, patriots. o7

Anonymous ID: c75c6b July 26, 2020, 1:31 p.m. No.10084706   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4710

>>10084695

 

I'd add that note I posted about [them] using the term "sex" to describe rape in articles. It's rampant. They're also doing it in articles about children being raped. They're calling it "sex."

 

[They] manipulate language. This is a battlefield for [them]. This is an important reminder for Anons to be alert to this sort of thing. Don't let them call raping a child or a woman "sex." No more trips down the slippery slope.