Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 3:55 a.m. No.10089594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9603 >>9613 >>9709

>>10089586

Trump can't answer it. If he does, he runs the risk of his public persona breaking down.

 

Of course he already has answered it at the rallies and press conferences via the pointing and hand motioning and so on.

 

Kayleigh on the other hand, would be a better outcome.

Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 3:59 a.m. No.10089607   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10089603

Kayleigh would be the only one in my eyes that could make such an announcement nonchalant and not give it just enough attention so that the media has a chance to ignore it but at the same time the pubic has a chance to blow it up.

 

I can't see that happening with anyone else.

Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 4:34 a.m. No.10089721   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9754 >>9832 >>9835 >>9859

>>10089715

What always gets me about that line is pic related.

There's a missing keystone, and it means something. It's taken out deliberately (in a metaphorical sense again, not in a literal sense for this statue).

 

What's the story behind that temple? Where did the original keystone go? What did is mean in the eyes of Baal?

Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 4:38 a.m. No.10089737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9743 >>9769

>>10089715

If that were the case, why wouldn't you say "(You) are the keystone! Be brave Anons!"?

 

Why have Anons "hunt" for it? Of course it might have just been the island or whatever, but it still just nags me. Like there's another Epstein island equivalent just hanging around somewhere that we've missed.

Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 5:46 a.m. No.10090016   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0049 >>0118

>>10089997

Just doesn't sit right. That's not something you make a mystery out of. That sort of remark speaks for itself and is interchangeable with us or any entity.

 

Not to say that that's not it, but it feels like there's a double meaning.

Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 6:01 a.m. No.10090099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0132

>>10090049

A keystone is about perspective. Let's think about the analogy from our perspective.

 

We came up from nothing at that point. Why would the analogy of something to hold up a structure be thrown onto us/Q+/Alphabet agency/etc? We're in the middle of dismantling something, it doesn't make sense to use to analogy of "us" being what holds a structure together. A structure we're meant to bring down.

 

KEYSTONE is a strange choice too. The base, the foundations, that could make more sense in regards to us. But considering the symbolism present in the Cabaal's affairs, that sort analogy gives the idea of "Tearing the temple down", finding out what the structural piece is to tear it all down, not a brick at a time.

Anonymous ID: 8a9a9d July 27, 2020, 6:14 a.m. No.10090166   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10090132

>>10090132

>Keystone has been defined in context by the very person who started it

 

One side has. What if the analogy has two buildings? Then we have one keystone as a foundation to keep, and another to be torn out. Question then is, what needs to be torn out take make the entire fucking temple collapse on their head.