you make me feel safe.
steven pinker and cass sunstein have been paying very close attention to anons for a while.
i know i keep them up at night.
speaking for myself only, anon does not consider sex with girls in their mid to late teens to be pedophilic. inappropriate as it may well be, sex with teens has been practiced openly with very little public censure from time out of mind. the problem in the modern era is more to do with their being psychologically incapable of processing the event – this age's youth stunted in a state of arrested emotional development and the contortion of sexual mores to such incredible extremes definitely exacerbates the issue.
sex, on the other hand, with prepubescent girls – especially little children – should represent the focus of our attention when it comes to all things pizza related. and i would say that focus should sharpen onto those crimes that involved the sadistic abuse of children.
let's not cast too wide a net here. again, not to say that sex with 16 year olds should be sanctioned, but it's a far cry from the torture and abuse of small children.
all of which is to say, we should trust POTUS.
>are epstein's girls there by their will?
yes, all of them are. the question is whether or not you believe girls in their mid to early teens possess the agency necessary to exercise their will – at least in this capacity.
>are they being exploited?
yes and no.
obviously yes on a certain level. the girls themselves know the score. their emotions aren't invested into this. they know they're hot but poor. they know these men have money. they are conscious of the exchange they're making. can they appreciate the gravity of the exchange? no, not adequately. but very few of us do at the time we make most of life's biggest decisions.
no – at least on a certain level – because some girls are just natural born sluts. why God/Nature deemed it necessary that a certain segment of girls would be born naturally predisposed to sex (we call them sexually precocious) is an inscrutable and curious thing.
it's a complicated and protean subject; and it's subjective in extremis. a man should know if he's preying on the vulnerabilites of a young girl; abuse should be an obvious dynamic; girls in the flower of their beauty is going to be an enduringly attractive motif in humanity. to me, it's like that SC justice said, "I can't define pornography (obscenity), but i know it when i see it."
>sound like a good person to you?
certainly not a sterling character trait…but, on balance (considering what we're up against), if i were to hear that dershowitz banged a 16 year old on lolita island i wouldn't condemn him to hell's fire.
>want on their side
dershowitz has the goods on the bad guys. if we have credible evidence that his crimes weren't wildly egregious, it seems to me that he'd make a valuable ally. and, for whatever it's worth, (and i've long viewed dershowitz dubiously), he's a first rate attorney.
let me just tell it to you bluntly:
if we draw a line in the sand and project this puritanical standard threatening every man who's ever had sex with a teenage slut with the scarlet letter "P"edo, we're going to alienate a huge swath of potential allies. this may shock you, but an outsized share of men (and women) who hold positions of middling power (sherriffs to small business owners to state senators to, well, high power lawyers) have, at one time or another, banged a slutty teen. it's just a reality of the world we live in; anon doesn't consider it 'that' bad a thing; and you cannot draw equivalence between banging a teen and ritually torturing an 8 year old.
if we are going to participate in the exercise of power, we cannot be preening polyannas. the world is a messy place. people are far from perfect. we, as a society, can grudgingly accept the flaws in others in pursuit of justice in those ways lacking all ambiguity.
as was said, we cannot paint with too broad a brush in these matters.
i still look young for my age; but i rather favor looking a bit more mature – for too long i looked too young. i was indeed steamrolled and mangled in unimaginable ways; even so, a face sculpted of woe and worry lends itself a bit of credibility – and certain men continue to look better well into old age (anon will be one of them).
with regard to rolling back the clock, to me it has more to do with the energy i exude. my optimism and hope are slowly (but steadily) being restored, and in time my presence will again pulse with the relevant energy. and, to your point, yes…the path of good yeilds a glow of youth throughout your life. eating right. avoiding degeneracy. staying close to God. nofap/minimum fap. positive thinking. that kind of stuff.
but i'm going to have to exercise a great deal of caution in the restoration process. having experienced what i have, i will be very reluctant to invest trust in others; and trust will be the salient and singular virtue sought in others.
wish anon had a tasty pepe to post. computer crashed a couple weeks ago. one of the world's finest and most carefully curated collection of memes was zapped in an instant.
>youwillalwayswinifyourenemiesarelosers.png
first of all, i am not guilty of anything remotely associated with teen sex.
in the second place, you don't know what goes on on lolita island, either.
what i can tell you is that the elite groom outsiders to join them in their depravity.
it starts with teen girls and ends in pizza parties.
to me a drug analogy is fair: drugs are bad. should we prosecute the guy toking on a roach? or should we concentrate on kingpins flooding our streets with heroin?
Q, should we tell the world about the burrowing bombs?
nuke powered diggers…totally undetectable…plausible deniability is utterly plausible (earthquakes).
do the ruskies have em, too?
can't get over the lack of shills