>so that the children have as much normalcy as possible.
Think about where your at, in clown world, and know that statement is false no matter what we do
>So disgusting to watch Twitter’
…or we could all just mass-exodus the pedo-run, unconstitutional, CCP spy-ring of a [platform] that is twatter…
…rather than promoting it
Too simple?
>Anybody got live of today's riots? Would appreciate it.
Would really appreciate it if we stopped mass-indoctrinating ignorant youths to do the bidding of elite pedo-faggots, instead
It's 457
How do none of you know to verify proper order of operation before guessing on maffs?
Scary…
Calculator = 10
Light bulb = 15 (So 3 x light bulb = 45)
So, Calculator x 3 Light bulbs = 450
Plus Clock = +7
So, 457
>They could each be 7 or they also could be the actual value as displayed by the clock hands, 9 or 3.
Shit didn't notice that.
Problem is pure [common core] fuckery
>459
Yeah. I just noticed that twist.
If the display of the clock equated the actual value, them you are correct to state 459.
They fucked over an otherwise simple subject pretty fucking bad.
Can't fucking stand anything about this world…
Problem with your assessment of the lightbulbs is that each "ray" would equate to just "1".
But 5 + 5 - 5 would equal just 5 if that were true.
So, in theory, each "ray" would have to equate to "3" to make the "If" part for light bulbs "true".
If that were the case, then the three "light bulbs" from the equation would represent "12" each, or 36 cumulatively.
However, breaking down the actual "logic" for a definitive answer becomes increasingly difficult for your view of what the clocks represent, if we are to take the moar abstract approach.
This no longer becomes a "mathematical" problem, but rather a hypothetical philosophical one.
Which is why those who forced common core onto children should be hung for treason.
Just sayin'
>There's only one interpretation
No. There is insufficient data to only have one acceptable interpretation.
This is genuinely a "trick" question
or [common core] fuckery, thanks to leaving one too many retards in power unattended
Final answer
>In each case, it's the thing that is changing this is being counted.
Look at how many different interpretations this board has seen in just one thread.
Also, look at the inconsistencies in the "logical" reasoning that the problem provided.
If you are going to say there is only ONE acceptable answer, you need to fully explain the "logic" behind the reasoning of each "value".
The calculator can be explained using digits shown.
However, both the clock and the light bulb are speculative, as assumptions must be drawn behind the "reasoning" of what equates to "value".
Thus, [trick question]. Even if you are the teacher, your answer will be "wrong" if conflicting with someone who can logically explain their conclusion soundly, based solely off the information available
Without definitive reasoning spelled out moar clearly, this problem will forever remain "speculative"
**I hate the fact th