Looking for lawfag commentary.
point 1: most communication is nonverbal
point 2: facial expressions are important to verbal communication
point 3: masks prevent/restrict the use of facial expression for communication
point 4: mask mandates are therefore an infringement on free speech
response: masks are necessary for public health
point 5: there is no scientific evidence that masks are effective in a=non clinical= setting at preventing the spread of influenza like illness or COVID-19
sauce: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article#r33
point 7: there exists scientific evidence that the prolonged wearing of masks may be harmful.
sauce: ? (seen them but don't have them on hand at the moment) [anecdotal- have heard people complain of increased headaches since wearing masks]{not talking about specific health condition here, but rather use by the general population}
point 8: if not effective, and potentially harmful they cannot be claimed to be necessary
Thoughts?