TYB
Anon now wonders if paralyzing the actor who played Superman might have been a psyop designed to demoralize the American people. hmm…
If he were comped maybe it was possible to pull off?
I analyzed it and came up with Hakeem Jeffries. The problem is that we don't know if he was looking directly at the speaker at that moment or if his eye were drawn to Hakeem, or someone else picking their nose or some such.
And they have been spotting Great Whites off Long Island and nearby waters.
It was posted two breads back.
>>10106445 past bread
>>10106501 past bread
I just looked at his eyes right after he said pizza his gaze shifted in the video. I went back and reviewed the C-Span feed and felt like it matched when Hakeem Jefferies was speaking. But here is another problem that probably spoils the whole analysis anyway. I thin the two videos were filmed through different cameras in different positions. So I pretty much have to throw the whole thing out. Sorry anon.
Worse than crabs.
>Christopher Reeve
Dana Reeve
On August 9, 2005, Reeve announced that, although she had never smoked cigarettes, she had been diagnosed with lung cancer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Reeve#Illness_and_death
Memory coming back about this. She was beautiful. It's almost as though she were exposed to and inhaled a carcinogen. Wasn't this around the time of radon gas coming into the news?
“Under oath, do you commit to not releasing any report by Mr. Durham before the November election?” Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, a Florida Democrat, asked the attorney general.
“No,” Barr replied. When asked again, he repeated, “No. I will be very careful.”
During cross-talk between Mucarsel-Powell and Barr, the Florida Democrat claimed the attorney general was saying, “you won’t go by Justice Department policy that you won’t interfere in any political investigations before the election.” Barr reiterated, “We’re not going to interfere — in fact, I’ve made it clear that we’re not going to tolerate interference.”
Mucarsel-Powell shot back, “But under oath, you’re saying that you do not commit to not releasing a report by Durham?”
Barr insisted, "Any report will be, in my judgment, not one that is covered by the policy and would disrupt the election." He added: “I’ve already made it clear that neither candidate is under investigation.”
Barr has said that he expects “developments” and a public report from Durham by the end of the summer. The top federal prosecutor in Connecticut is investigating misconduct by federal law enforcement and intelligence officials in an inquiry that has been much hyped by Republicans and derided by Democrats as an effort to tar President Trump's political enemies.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/barr-2020-election-wont-delay-report-from-john-durham