Anonymous ID: 57e436 July 28, 2020, 7:44 p.m. No.10109905   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10109008

 

The worst enemy of a cause is a bad advocate.

 

Just enough truth mixed with ideas that, even if they are true, the general public is not even remotely willing to entertain the thought of at this point (i.e. alien DNA, demons, etc.).

 

Perfect way to invalidate HCQ by association.

 

Any digs on the doctor's affiliations, politically? Sleeper/never-Trumper? I wouldn't be surprised.

 

Meanwhile, too many normies just won't get the fact that just because she has unacceptable ideas about aliens/demons/homosexuality (as per liberal ideology), doesn't mean that she's wrong about HCQ.

 

Guilt by association.

 

[They] will milk this for all it's worth.

 

This is really heating up.

Anonymous ID: 57e436 July 28, 2020, 7:50 p.m. No.10109979   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0001

>>10109946

 

I'd say it depends upon how far gone it is. The more cooked the drive is, the more you'll need a comprehensive piece of forensics software to piece together bits of files.

 

I've done some serious forensic work, but not on something with that sort of damage. More completely messed up OSes, with files that I needed forensics software to piece back together and guess at what file types they are. Time consuming, but cool work.

Anonymous ID: 57e436 July 28, 2020, 7:53 p.m. No.10110004   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10109985

 

Thanks fren. We need people kicking back at shills every now and then. Not so much that it mucks up the bread. But, enough to show their bullshit isn't what real anons are about. o7

Anonymous ID: 57e436 July 28, 2020, 7:55 p.m. No.10110032   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0141

>>10110001

 

Anytime. Check out PhotoRec if you're curious on forensics software: https://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec (I've used it for photos and other file types)

 

It's free and I used it a while back with good results.

 

Not sure if you're looking for software, but if so, it's a good place to start.

Anonymous ID: 57e436 July 28, 2020, 7:57 p.m. No.10110056   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10110016

 

I thought her speech was powerful, but the other ideas she has could fuck up the pro-HCQ push by association. It could turn out like a Trojan Horse. I'm suspending judgment until I get more info on her. I'd love to know more about her affiliations, politics, etc. Something doesn't sit right with me. Maybe it's nothing. But, maybe not.