Found in the wild, posted today…
"We are at war. There has been an exchange of multiple “long-latency” next generation bioweapons. This is why you are seeing things unfold as they are. Someone else shared some of this information here and it inspired me to contact someone "in the loop."
I can’t offer more. I can share some info which is readily available. Nothing that will constitute “proof.” You will have to connect the dots. Think about what you are hearing regarding positive tests in relation to recruiting.
I have limited time and can only share this. I know this sort of revelation has become a joke. Do not trust me. I wouldn’t trust anyone here either. Use logic. Think about what you are seeing and how events have evolved.
Biological and electromagnetically triggered vectors of various complexity are being utilized. It’s a mess. They are uncertain about the long term consequences.
New JANUS models are catastrophic. There was some hope they could use recent events to their advantage. They now know this is beyond their control. There are no clear solutions.
Pandora’s box is open. Everything you see is orchestrated. They are placating and pacifying you.
Prepare for the worst. God help us all.
The long-latency scenario is perhaps the most interesting because for the first time in human history, biological warfare will be possible where the biological agent can be delivered long in advance of a planned attack and can be triggered at the time of attack. The term "stealth virus" has been used to describe such an attack,but it is possible that nonviral vectors could be designed for this type of attack as well. In the case of an engineered virus, a population maybe silently transfected, probably with a retrovirus, that leads to incorporation of an inducible transgene or a transgene-productng prodrug-converting enzyme into the genome of the host.
Later, the population at risk would be exposed to an inducer or a prodrug, which produces the impairing effects required by the scenario.The long-latency sce- nario is much more complex than the short-latency approach, because with the existing technology, it would require that the population at risk be "exposed" twice: once to the vector and later to the inducer or prodrug.
1/2
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4470927/pg1