Are anons against titties now?
A lot has changed.
Yeah, yeah, I know the choir boy anons will say REAL anons never post naked pics, only shills. Not true, both shills and (some) anons love titties.
>There is no point in posting porn on here except shitposting + trying to distract
We're going on almost 3 years of this shit argument. Got so bad once we outlawed tits for like 2 and a half days. I come here to be informed, true, but I like that freespeech roams free here. Tits and all.
Well shadilay, fren, catch ya next bread when I drop my one to two shit posts.
God bless.
Here’s your “inside baseball” primer on the next steps, to stick with Powell’s metaphor. With the answers in, all of the active judges — this excludes the “senior judges” who are semi-retired — on the D.C. Circuit will review the arguments and begin the internal debate. Any of those judges can call for a vote, just as any of the judges could call for an answer.
Most likely, the judges will let the panel members share their thoughts first. For the most part, these exchanges will take place electronically through emailed vote sheets, with comments attached, although a few judges may chat privately with each other on their thoughts.
Given that Wilkins dissented from the panel decision, it seems likely he requested an answer from Powell and the government on Judge Sullivan’s petition. Given his strident questioning and dissent, it also seems likely he will call for a vote. For the case to be heard en banc, though, a majority of the 11 active judges must vote to rehear the case before the full court.
Whether Wilkins can collect five other votes is unclear, but if this were a normal case, it would be unlikely that a majority of the judges would want to expend the time to resolve an issue unlikely to occur ever again. But this isn’t a normal case, and when politics are in play — and Sullivan has demonstrated they are — propriety goes out the window. Sullivan has proven the latter point in spades as well. The question remains, though, whether the appellate court will join suit.
While there is no set time limit for a vote, we should know the answer within about 10 days. And if we haven’t heard by then, it most likely means the votes are not there to go en banc, but one or more judges intend to file a dissent to the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc to pontificate about Flynn, or U.S. Attorney General William Barr, or Trump.
>https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/21/whats-in-the-legal-briefs-over-whether-judge-sullivan-can-keep-harassing-michael-flynn/
I doubt it. The Judge Salas case is deutsche bank related. In fact Deutsche Bank had 3 shady as fuck customers, Epstein being one of them. They were fined and the stock fell. A lawsuit from investors followed, saying Deutsche Bank wasn't upfront with shareholders that they were providing banking services for quite possibly the most overtly corrupt criminals in the world.
My gut feeling says Judge Salas was attacked because of the case's links to the other criminal syndicates. All kinds of terrorists and Eastern European mafia in play.
See Dankse Bank and FMBE to know about the two other clients not named Epstein and still kicking (well some of them, Aivar Rehe, Danske CEO was suicided in his back yard a month after Epstein.)
Correction- FBME