It's rampant on twitter, too. I'm surprised @Jack wasn't invited. Several models are questionable, and many other have "only fans" pages, which seems to have become the new "Backpage" for "sex work". Honestly, twitter almost looks like a sting operation at this point. So either they aren't really trying to hide their honeypots, or they really are just that brazen in pushing their content.
poncikkizporno
LilyIvyMFC
lustingtrixie
OnlyFans
Better to work under the radar and enact policies than to outright revoke someone's clearance. That was a pretty smooth move.
I'm not even kidding. I have a burner account I use to do research and report shit. That first account's list of recommended "Who to follow" that shows up is always looking like a "who's who" of people that would run a trap on unsuspecting pervs. I reported the account anyway because if it is white hats running an op, they need to make that shit less obvious.
https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1286502120598822912
@CodeMonkeyZ
If the Three Gorges dam fails, something like 300 million lives are in danger. It would be one of the greatest disasters ever. Hopefully they get it under control before it is too late.
Nature is a fickle bitch, but I suspect there's more to it. At any rate, I do hope/pray for those ~300mm people.
>The whole fucking show.
Anon, it was obvious after no one in the press pool would ask Sarah Sanders or POTUS back then. Still doesn't mean we didn't act like good anons and push the message that they were too skeered to axe. Think about it a sec. Not a single one of those reporters would ever pass up an opportunity to ask the Q (Pulizter opportunity). Instead, they avoid it like the plague.
Being on the team means that sometimes, you are a part of the machinations, too. The ups and downs, twists and turns. I still think I would have done the COVID thing differently, but it's better than whatever alternative they drew up, I suppose.
>REVOKE 230 FROM THESE DECEITFUL SNAKES!
Damn right. All of them.
She was not. She was asked about fringe groups like people wearing Qanon shirts lumped in with "Black for Trump" and equated them as being "violent". She answered the question twice with the exact same answer, and holding back a huge smirk the second time.
Watch how the MSM mischaracterizes this shit, right before your eyes. The video is near the top of the article, and the article tells a different account of what actually happened:
https://heavy.com/news/2018/08/sarah-sanders-qanon-question-answer-video/
OK.
Say he comes out, day one, and expresses a "Non violent transfer of power from the DS to the people" over his first live televised broadcast directly to the American people. Let's say he calls out the MSM, immediately, in that first address. Think like Reagan in the OO style type of speech. Just comes on TV, and lays out a good bit of it from the get go; taking the complete opposite approach from Q's insistence that he'd never go to the podium and address the public in regards to all the matters discussed here. But he doesn't stop there. Next week, he drops crumbs, publicly, just like Q does here, "backchanneling".
Say this persists to present day. No Q, just @POTUS and him telling everyone what's going on. How's the landscape different? Is there still a portion of the public that isn't onboard? How would it compare to right now? How about in November during election?
The biggest problem that my most difficult people to win over, is, if it's all true then why not simply come forward with it all, and stand behind the statements? We see what happened with HCQ, but due to the nature of what we're doing here, @POTUS took months to finally start seeming like he was taking public action to let doctors prescribe it as they see fit. Could that scenario have been handled differently under a "straight to the people approach"?
You know how the MSM and politicians played the game all these years to get folks to want to go to war with Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. Why not use the exact same tactics while exposing the media bias in the process, directly to the people from the podium?
In what ways would the board look different?
>One gets them paid, dummi.
What are people going to do when they find out what has really driven the value of currency was the black market of trafficking children? How many kids go missing every year, again?
Reporter asks @POTUS directly:
"Sir, who or what is Qanon?"
That simple, anon. I drummed up the list of WH correspondants years ago, and not a single one of them would do it. They were barraged by anons to ask the Q, and eventually, some responded very sternly that they'd never ask that question.
Part of the plan.
That virus doesn't stand a chance against Gohmert. It'll be deposited in the shitter by the evening by sheer force of will.
Hell yes, right out of Dennis' playbook:
I'm going to open a millstone business.