some last thread notables:
>>1012165 Dark Ops Dugan.
>>1012417 Zuckerberg is generation 1.
>>1012495 circular-flow diagram
+
>>def468
>>1011870
>>1011910
>>1012023
heads up
>a34687
>>1011908
>>1011969
>>1011997
>>1012048
heads up
too long for notables, but everything by this anon is digworthy:
>a34687
>>1011908 <<a34687 anon
>>1011969 <<a34687 anon
>>1011997 <<a34687 anon
>>1012048 <<a34687 anon
>>1012165 <<a34687 anon
>>1012303 <<a34687 anon
>>1012372 <<a34687 anon
>>1012438 <<a34687 anon
>>1012468 <<a34687 anon
>>1012495 <<a34687 anon
>>1012509 <<a34687 anon
>>1012515 <<a34687 anon
//
prev bread:
>Anonymous 04/12/18 (Thu) 12:04:57 a34687 No.1012515
>>1012474 (You)
>>1012417 Zuckerberg is generation 1.
>>1012456 Please.
wait wut, are you (a34687) confirming?
new friend in this thread
hellofriend. god, this is fun
https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/1012506.html#q1012637
18e41a
>>1012637 electronic tattoo/Mark of the Beast/RFID
>That electronic tattoo of hers is highly suspicious to me. Very much looks like a prototype. For maybe an all digital banking system or other types of NWO control.
>Remember the 'Mark of the Beast' dig and RFID. This would make us all like wearing electric fence dog collars. Just a zap and maybe we would be frozen in our tracks due to muscle tensions or some other technique. This would fit EXTREMELY well in that category. Wonder who invented this.
>but the original idea was a RFID Chip in the hand. not as a Tattoo.
well yeah. People would therefore show more resistance to chip in hand than "kewl smart tattos"…
argh need moar hands on deck
i'm also squeezed for time
Focus on the best notables of a specific ID per thread
Maybe we should have text to explain…
what i wrote earlier:
>we don't need the crumbs anymore
actually we are getting more crumbs than we can handle, since last night, just not only from Q.
Forget the "helper" theory, it doesn't matter who exactly these posters are: what they bring is smoking hot gold digs.
find the IDs, see for yourselves.
dig.
///
ever since last night's Snowden drop, we have been blessed with amazing insights and crumbs, from multiple unidentified anons & teams. it's real. forget delta-helper-theory, judge them by their fruits.
it's real.
A witch hunt is on for Regina Dugan, among other things.
Follow the wives.
Facebook building8.
oh, and TIME's Stormy.
fuckyeah.
they are the MCAnons
and this show is fkn amazing
more context here:
capped catchups (far from covering everything, can give an idea of how much we have and have yet to dig into):
>>1008644 Snowden/MCAnons MicDrops_A
>>1008654 Snowden/MCAnons MicDrops_B
>>1010038 FollowTheWives_WitchHunting (JA?)
>>1010045 MCAnons_Tales of the Dark Priestess of Dark Ops
thank you very much!
it would be a disaster if all these crumbs went unnoticed and unarchived.
obvious ops from shills this morning to shove this aside.
FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT
no, Q needs you/us.
can't be done without us
//
Discoveries must be ORIG organically.
Hive-mind.
Q
Connection made.
RC end.
We have grounds.
Reverting.
Thank you.
Q
nicework!
you have one doubled, try having them chronological:
>>1012495 circular-flow diagram
later
>>1012495 <<a34687 anon
coryyyyyyyyyyy
>wait for Board Owner to make his or her connections.
?
they're often busy with shills and adjusting mistakes in bread, not sure if waiting on them/asking them to manage notables is a good idea (maybe i'm missing something though, saw a lot but missed a lot since lastnight)
ok, i see. careful with fuckery.
we got lots of good stuff since last night, shills would want to destroy that for sure.
(i can take notes, but i can't keep up, seriously.. trying)
anon mission for anons who don't know what to do
go over breads since 1251.
find the (1) posts IDs that post crumbs.
find the (x) posts IDs that post crumbs too.
find the IDs that interact with them.
find the helpful IDs.
they are there.
they are here now.
>How did my picture end up in this?
well, you're a separate but noteworthy anon, not trying to conflate the crews, sorry.
having a hard time explaining this/pointing out all the BIGLY to anons
you know the MCAnons? can tell us more about them? about you?
so >n(ice).jpg was really your pic?
holyfffffffffffffff i can't believe i'm talking to who i might be talking to
not sure, can't be too explicit on board in front of everyone. it's in the witchhunting cap, though
>where are my fellow patriots?
i don't know, bakery's been a little weird, sometimes… god bless the nightcrew like you, such a good job. sorry for not helping out more with bakes, can't often commit to the time
failing? i don't see you failing, don't be sorry.
THANKS FOR BEING PART OF IT ALL
IT'S HAPPENING
NO, you're a shill and/or an idiot and should re-read crumbs and breads from last night.
the game has changed.
try to keep up
what's with all these anons pretending not to understand the we have grounds logic?
re-read crumbs.
they have it all. can't use it like that.
needs to come from public forum.
this is public forum.
was it really Snowden? who knows. same difference.
grounds
the plan
dig
ok, fair enough. thanks for all you do, regardless.
send my regards to MCAnons as well
sorry for not being able to do more
godspeed
>Anybody else amazed at how evil all the women are in this whole thing? Been at this since FBI Anon and I tell ya, geez. One after another after another, James Bond villain-tier crazy women.
FOLLOW THE WIVES
but am i generally right with what i capped and selected since last night? What do you know of the MCAnons? Have them & you been here from the start, or only recently? so many questions, so little time (and so much other things to dig into)