Ill settle for addy. Please just send it to my address guys. You know you've got it
I think they were pressuring Abbott with something big. No sauce, just a thought.
agreed. We were thrown into the fire, and why should we nerf it for newbies. They've got other places that are easier than this place if they cant handle it
the one saying keep the board a chan. Tf is it with you "SHLLLLLLLLL" tards…..
that anon never said he was wrong, but was talking about how he seems to want to talk for others, indicated by how he speaks. It is annoying af.
no, he's not. You're just making bullshit up to feel right. He said stop speaking for others, but he himself never spoke for others. He was speaking in general. You sound like youre tarded af trying to win.
dude, go fuck your tarded self. You're 13 posts in at the start of the bread.
call me shill all you want, but you've got the iq of a fucking shoe. Have fun till next bread. I wont be seeing your faggoty useless bullshit anymore.
So if these technically arent redacted, wouldnt that give her a possible way out?
Its a chan…………….
LAWFAGS PLZ
If the documents being released arent technically redacted, would that give her an easy way to declare a mistrial and get out of stuff?
Seems kinda important
hope you're right, but idk to be honest. This just seems fishy af
thanks for nothing, faggot
but its not just the docs im talking about, its the redactions not being redacted. You can have the reader read out the redacted parts, or cope paste them to see.
and youve got no idea what i was talking about. Like i said, thanks for nothing
have any thoughts on this?
The redacted parts technically arent redacted. Seems like a way out of it to me.
seems like a great way to declare mistrial to me
you'd probably still suck on them once. I would. One time only, though