>>10133993 /pb

>If unredacted parts weren't redacted correctly and folks were able to see it, seems like a major fuck up to me

I agree that it's a fuck up.

Just don't think it materially affects the case against Jizz.

Sure affects some other people though…..

>>10134010 /pb

>Any other tools outside of pacer that are just as good?

Well, there are several that are better overall.

But, they all cost significantly more….

As far as low cost & immediate access -

PACER is usually the best bet

Sometimes courts will put them up on their own websites - that is worth a look also. No idea if this court does - it is not as typical as it used to be though.

There are some small legal start-ups that pop up now and again that scrape for filings. Nothing jumps to mind, but I will poke around a bit.