>we need something every single American can rally behind.
>
>Pedophilia.
>
>who can defend that?
>
>UNITED against PEDOPHILES!
Oh, anon, don't you know they're victims now?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8568833/Paedophile-Labour-councillor-worked-childrens-home-walks-free.html
>>>10136078 I didnt nec. mean I agree with it but goes along that transhuman or further evolutionary eprspective some theories seem to go on. Personally is odd to baker.
If willies can be grown to order this supports the idea you can chop your baby son's off because he likes pink so must be a girl, then if he misses it just stitch it back on. Iirc same was proposed with mastectomies for teenage girls a while back, slice 'em off, sew 'em back if missed (barf). So this anon humbly votes notable in context of the way leftism has this obsession with radical genital surgery, and treating bodies like a DIY project.
Is ABCU a good place for effortposts without getting "you typed so many words" and "plebbit spacing" bullshit? This anon has a few ideas gestating, too tame for /pnd/ and would benefit from the sort of feedback not possible in fast-mocing Q-research breads.
>I read Q’s long drop and apparently all you have to do is vote and everything on that list will be cleared up.
The better question is, will anything on that list be cleared up if Biden gets into the White House? Would anything we're on here for be happening if Clinton had won in 2016, instead of losing?