I wonder why the court today directed to strike docket entries 1090-38 and 1090-41? Those are the heavily redacted lists of people who have knowledge in case (attached). Twatter peeps claiming that the redacted docs could be revealed with copy pasta into text, which was true on one of the docs released yesterday. But so far as I can see, not on the new docs. Anyone?

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1091/giuffre-v-maxwell/

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge:

For reasons that the Court has discussed with counsel, the Clerk of the Court is directed to strike docket entries 1090-38 and 1090-41 in the above-captioned action. Counsel shall re-file the stricken documents as soon as is practicable.

>>10139273

"Trump withdraws 12,000 U.S. troops from Germany to bring them home to defend free and fair elections on November 3rd"

>>10139334

Okay, so we have both sets then? Honestly, this entire dump seems worthless at this point.