Anonymous ID: e9a14a July 31, 2020, 5:20 p.m. No.10144096   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4131 >>4196 >>4204 >>4238 >>4384 >>4623 >>4625

BREAKING: The Second Circuit GRANTED a motion by Ghislaine Maxwell to delay the release of her deposition.

 

The appeal will be heard on Sept. 22. @CourthouseNews

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1289304744503123970

 

Note: This does not rule on the substance of Maxwell's arguments against the depositions release. It keeps the status quo until the Second Circuit can hear the matter.

 

Read the two-page order here. https://documentcloud.org/documents/7011697-2ndCirc-Maxwell-7-31-2020.html

 

Background here https://courthousenews.com/ghislaine-maxw

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1289305942719332353

 

Judge Roasts Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘Eleventh-Hour’ Bid to Block Deposition

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1289305942719332353

Anonymous ID: e9a14a July 31, 2020, 5:46 p.m. No.10144399   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Prince Andrew lobbied US government for better plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein, newly released Ghislaine Maxwell documents claim

 

Newly unsealed court documents claim the Duke of York allegedly lobbied the US government for his former friend Jeffrey Epstein to secure a “favourable” plea deal in the disgraced late financier’s underage prostitution case. More light has been shed on Prince Andrew’s relationship with the convicted sex offender, from whom he has distanced himself, through the documents which were published after the court rejected an appeal by Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell to keep them secret. The documents, released on Thursday, were from a now-settled 2015 defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Epstein’s alleged victims who named Andrew as one of the notable men she claims she was pressured into having sex with as a 17-year-old. Ms Giuffre claimed in the suit and other litigation that she was recruited by Maxwell in 2000 to be a sexual slave to Epstein and was also pressured into having sex with US politicians, wealthy entrepreneurs, a famous scientist and a fashion designer.

 

The Duke, all the accused men and Maxwell have denied the allegations. But a photo that emerged of Andrew with his arm around a young Ms Giuffre in a mansion in London put the royal close to the centre of the scandal. Two of Epstein’s victims, known only as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, alleged the convicted paedophile depended on his high-profile friends, including Andrew, to help him secure a reduced sentence from the US attorney in south Florida. They appealed for the release of the documents in the case as they said it would prove Andrew’s involvement in Epstein’s case.

 

“[They are] seeking documents regarding Epstein’s lobbying efforts to persuade the government to give him a favourable plea arrangement, including efforts on his behalf by Andrew and former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz,” claimed the victims. “They have alleged these materials are needed to prove their allegations that, after Epstein signed the non-prosecution agreement, his performance was delayed while he used his significant social and political connections to lobby the justice department to obtain a more favourable plea deal.” In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution as part of a secret “sweetheart deal” offered by Florida prosecutors. He was only sentenced to 13 months in jail, though much of it was spent outside of a prison and he was allowed to travel to his office almost daily. Ms Giuffre was asked by her lawyers as part of her deposition in 2016 if Andrew would have “relevant information” that would be useful to investigators.

 

She said: “Yes, he would know a lot of the truth. I don’t know how much he’d be able to help you with, but seeing as he’s in a lot of trouble himself these days I think he might, so I think he might be valuable.” The newly released documents also reveal email correspondence between Maxwell and Epstein, who died in August last year while in prison for other charges. They also contain claims from Ms Giuffre that Ms Maxwell had sex with girls as young as 15.

 

Two documents that were not released as scheduled on Thursday were depositions Maxwell gave in the civil lawsuit in 2016, as her lawyers appealed the ruling to have them released. They said the documents should be blocked since Maxwell now faces criminal charges for aiding Epstein’s abuse of underage girls. She has denied the charges and currently awaits trial in prison in New York following her arrest earlier this month.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-plea-deal-pedophile-florida-a9647851.html

Anonymous ID: e9a14a July 31, 2020, 6:18 p.m. No.10144668   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Supreme Court denies request to halt construction of the border wall

 

A number of groups, including the ACLU and Sierra Club, had asked the high court to get involved

 

The Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote has denied a request to halt construction of President Trump’s border wall over environmental concerns. A number of groups, including the ACLU and Sierra Club, had asked the high court to get involved again after the justices last year cleared the way for the administration to use military funds for construction while the case played out in the courts. A federal appeals court had ruled against the administration last month, but the justices, for now, have given another temporary victory to the administration. "The fight continues,” said Dror Ladin, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s National Security Project. “Every lower court to consider the question has ruled President Trump's border wall illegal, and the Supreme Court’s temporary order does not decide the case. We’ll be back before the Supreme Court soon to put a stop to Trump’s xenophobic border wall once and for all.”

 

The four liberal justices dissented from Friday’s order. In June, the Supreme Court also declined to hear an appeal from a coalition of environmental groups that pushed back against the Trump administration's construction of the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. The groups, led by the Center for Biological Diversity, challenged a 1996 law giving the president authority to fight illegal immigration and border crossings, and limiting some legal challenges. The coalition claimed that the Trump administration did not conduct sufficient environmental impact studies for the construction and that endangered species like the jaguar and Mexican wolf would be adversely affected by the barrier. They had asserted in their case that the law’s allowance for the secretary of Homeland Security to waive any laws necessary to allow the quick construction of border fencing violates the Constitution’s separation of powers. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals had dismissed the case, citing a prior case from 2007 with "a nearly identical context."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-denies-request-to-halt-construction-of-the-border-wall