Your words and phrasing sound comfortingly familiar. Common sense, optimism, and faith are like a breath of fresh air in the midst of this maelstrom of current events. God bless you.
Just starting to read his latest, but wanted to comment on the disconnect he starts out with. That is something I've become aware of these past few years with Q and our research. I've been astounded at times watching our government officials at hearings and on TV appearances, and realizing how very little they actually KNOW. We've researched, and studied, and gained knowledge, and most times think others know the same things we do, but that is just not true. Most of the information we have has had to be compiled, and many dots connected. It takes time and dedication, which most people do not have.
>I greatly support him.
As do I. This latest update gave me a wonderful sense of hope. I believe he's succeeding in his endeavor.
I was off on another website reading comments under an article and one made by a physician referenced a CV19 treatment protocol I'd not heard of before. Has anyone else heard of the MATH + protocol? It's interesting and definitely something to add to my "file of info" should I find myself having to discuss CV treatment with a doctor.
https://www.evms.edu/media/evms_public/departments/internal_medicine/EVMS_Critical_Care_COVID-19_Protocol.pdf
Also note the observation that there are 2 types of responses to the disease - flu-like with relatively minor symptoms, and the cytokine storm response that results in the lung damage.
>If we didn’t have cases. What would there be.
This is it, exactly. The curve has been flattened. Death rates are steady or declining. Hospitals are not being overwhelmed as now systems are in place to handle a surge of patients. Various treatments are working. Without a rising number of cases, there's nothing else to keep the sheep fearful. That why testing is being pushed so hard.