Baker

So yesterday I was looking into some material from previous stings that took place during the Obama administration because, frankly, I didn't trust them to actually be doing what they claimed they were doing. I found some extremely suspicious things that I believe will be of great interest here as well.

"Operation Torpedo" was an FBI driven nationwide sting against TOR using individuals who were sharing CP material around 2012. During that time period 16 individuals were arrested including two of those I am attaching photos on. The two biggest arrests came of one Timothy Defoggi and Aaron McGrath. DeFoggi was especially important due to his position as Director of Cybersecurity at the Obama Health and Human Services Department. This took place in 2011, keep that in mind, and the jail time for each was meant to be over ten years. Well upon further digging I found the following LinkedIn accounts and connections which leads me to believe they were either let go or never were arrested in the first place.

1) The first photo attachment is the generic Wikipedia explanation on Operation Torpedo.

2) The second is the Obama administration DOJ announcement about the sting.

3) The third photo is the two LinkedIn profiles (current) of the two individuals. I tracked down McGrath's mugshot and it looks identical to the photo he is using for his current LinkedIn profile.

4) All local news has removed any/all reports about it (404).

Both individuals appear to now be in high end positions with other tech related groups. Both of which, in my opinion, deserve our attention. The biggest question I have is why would these two (there are others I found but these are the highest profile of the bunch) be out and working with tech companies if they were arrested and charged with CP?

Eyes on Baker and anons, I think I stumbled upon something here.

>>10151847

There are videos and photos. How do you have a hunch it is fake when the material is right infront of you to see for yourself?

>>10151878

I am actually very surprised my breakdown of Operation Torpedo and the current situation has not been discussed yet. That is a very serious issue and not a single anon has even noticed it. I usually am on nightshift and had no idea dayshift had such a low desire to look into serious issues if this is norm.

>>10151909

It is properly posted and explained in totality picture by picture and issue by issue. There is nothing improper about it.

>>10151939

Are you kidding me? In all these years I have been doing this I have never ran into a Baker with your attitude about their duty such as saying you have a hunch or you are not going to go back by scrolling up for two seconds to see something that another anon claims to be of importance. Not to mention you just cited I needed to post something properly without even checking to see if I did it properly. Here:

>>10151764

>>10151977

It literally proves that two people who were arrested for and charged with child porn during the Obama administration were not arrested and are currently working for tech groups that spy on and data collect on civilians and you do not think that is important? You are either simply not intelligent enough to see how major of an issue that is or you are a shill for the very same group who let people off who were engaging in child pornography.

>>10152002

So it is the latter and the former, got it.

>>10152014

I am saying you are not fulfilling your duty by your own words. For example there was a post earlier about Portland leftists burning this/that and you said it is fake news because of your hunch. All it would take is five minutes for you to see the article on it:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/portlands-peaceful-protesters-burn-bibles-american-flags-and-pigs-head-after-feds

Then you follow that up by telling me that my post isn't properly submitted when you hadn't even look at it. If you truly have been on/worked on things during nightshift then you would definitely know that is not how we do things on that shift and you would be absolutely interested in getting to the bottom of these things. Now I am not saying that you are a piece of shit or even a shill but I am saying that in these two cases you are failing your duty as Baker. If that is upsetting to you, fair enough, hopefully it gets you off your lazy ass to do your job instead of trying to make comparisons with the POTUS for some unknown reason. In all these years I have never complained about a Baker but you are not doing your job so get on it and stop making excuses for not doing it, that is what libtards do.

>>10152187

Alright, it is obvious now that you are indeed a shill Baker. You omit the story about leftists burning those things from another anon and you don't mention the fact I quite literally just unearthed child porn users being fake arrested and now working in high positions at tech groups.

>>10152242

No, you don't have any sources at all. You are clearly a shill baker. Not a single anon ever, in the entire history of this thing, would ever act in the manner of which you are acting.

Board Owner

Get on this please and get rid of this individual.

>>10152309

Oh it definitely helps. The Board Owner team is always watching and often comes in to purge these issues and make a post about it. They definitely take action here against these types of things.

>>10152313

You just stated that you have sources to invalidate a very on point post about child porn users being let go while working in the tech industry and yet you think you know what "we" do here. Regardless, it makes no difference, that post you are clearly trying to assure does not get out will be posted later and you will be removed from your position never to be in it again given how the BO team tends to treat those such as yourself. So you can play dumb, make up whatever baloney story you want, or do whatever you wish to try to shift eyes off your obvious connection to everything we are not but in the end it will make no difference as the BO team has no mercy for those such as you.

>>10152339

Already made contact with them so the case is over and done with. You can make your BS excuses to the BO team.

>>10152378

I do. Too much to the point where I can even spot shills working in pairs or triplets. But it makes no difference, the issue is over and done with and reported and those issues that were correctly posted here for review will be discussed later once this baker is done away with for good and one who cares about the country is in there. This happens every so often that someone such as this Baker sneaks in and they fuck with things for a few hours until the BO team is alerted and handles it. So you can play your shill partner team up game all you wish, it makes no difference, seen it all before, know all your games inside and out, and not a single one of them will have the slightest impact on any real anon here.

>>10152411

Dude puts his own post in notables. Has there ever been a more obvious shill Baker? Not in my memory at least.

>>10152423

I am only complaining due to the Baker obviously being pozzed. Have you even read their statements about why they haven't put it in? They claim to have super secret sources but can't reveal them because reasons. Of course it deserves to be complained about. We would never get anything done here if we didn't complain and have these idiots removed.