Anonymous ID: c7a8f4 Aug. 1, 2020, 1:43 p.m. No.10151910   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1950 >>2157

 

https://www.npr.org/2020/05/03/848347895/ballot-printers-increase-capacity-to-prepare-for-mail-voting-surge

 

So, have states already ramped up, quietly, for mail in voting? This article suggest that it's not done rapidly.

 

Company in article: https://runbeck.net/

 

PPP loan: https://www.cnn.com/projects/ppp-business-loans/businesses/runbeck-election-services-inc

 

Not a good enough researcher to find financial information, etc. on Runbeck, whether he did it himself or?

 

But in trying to find information on ballot printers for states (Runbeck dominates in search) what is popping up are articles, some referencing "successful" vote by mail states, is that this can't be ramped up fast and it takes a long time to get right-whatever that means to them. We're talking several years. States that don't do all mail would have enormous challenges trying to accomplish that. (Besides not a good idea for voting)

 

I'm beginning to think that the Democrats aren't just after the mechanism for election fraud vote by mail allows. If they want to delay election results, then the melee caused by attempting a last minute switch to mail insures that.

Anonymous ID: c7a8f4 Aug. 1, 2020, 2:11 p.m. No.10152157   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10151910

Thinking also in states where secretary of state is under influence of parties or "influences," they will do all they can to limit polling places. That has to stop. Our body, our choice. Our vote, our choice of how we do that.