Anonymous ID: 96938d April 12, 2018, 2:55 p.m. No.1016324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6345 >>6371 >>6441

>>1015665

 

@@@@@@@@@@@@@

 

Theory on the central algorithm:

 

This is what Q is talking about, injection into it.

 

We know that the clowns control/controlled the algorithm.

 

Seems to me this is now in /ourguys/ hands, and with the help of @snowden, it was injected with a white hat change.

 

Leaves the question about how its technically used.

 

My suspicion is that copies of it are located in each tech company involved. There is no way it can be decentralized so all are using a single version, impossible levels of traffic to manage and the internet would notice.

 

Each copy of the algorithm is under lock and key in each facility, and must have a controlled mechanism to update it, probably remotely.

 

We say this after 9/11 when the room was discovered at one of the ISPs which had a giant splitter copying all the traffic into GOV hands.

 

So a code injection that disables/modifies the algorithm would probably require rolling restarts across the server farms to work with the new codebase, something along those lines.

 

Anyone seeing changes in interactions with their recent tweets?

 

Thoughts otherwise?

Anonymous ID: 96938d April 12, 2018, 2:59 p.m. No.1016396   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1016371

 

I agree. But the idea that it's once central thing is probably impossible.

 

Its a centralized code base, but it has to be physically distributed across the different companies or facilities.

Anonymous ID: 96938d April 12, 2018, 3:05 p.m. No.1016494   🗄️.is 🔗kun

One way to know if there is a change is to stop using @potus in tweets

 

The other is if you start seeing engagement on the left on your tweets. Don't you feel like you are completely corralled? Nobody leftist engages.