Anonymous ID: 829697 Aug. 2, 2020, 1:45 a.m. No.10158853   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8862 >>8863 >>8867 >>8869 >>8878 >>8934

>>10158841

He was crucified as a political threat to caesar.

 

He only got into that position because he made the Romans spend resources and waste time and energy dealing with the shit he'd cause.

 

Why would the jews pick Jesus, guy who fucked shit up and pissed off the local occupying force, over Barrabas, the hometown hero who actually killed one of those Roman Assholes?

Anonymous ID: 829697 Aug. 2, 2020, 1:58 a.m. No.10158898   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10158878

Competing power.

One of the problems with religion is that it isn't based on locality, region, relation, etc..

 

It's a power structure based on a group of people who all believe the same narrative.

 

Rome, as well as all other theocracies, would find that as a threat, as do all secular governments, would they not?

 

Consider the Islamic position on secular laws vs Allah's Laws.

Anonymous ID: 829697 Aug. 2, 2020, 2:21 a.m. No.10158994   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8999

>>10158978

>>10158983

Beyond the point that the Roman military thought little to nothing about merc'ing the jews, again…

 

Why is there no reference to the Passover Pardon outside of that one section of the bible?

Nowhere else in Roman nor Jewish records…

 

You'd think it'd be something of note.

Anonymous ID: 829697 Aug. 2, 2020, 2:25 a.m. No.10159011   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9025

>>10159003

It's like you're going with the Master and Margarita narrative instead of the biblical one…

 

Beyond that, Pilate would have been executed along with everyone threatening to riot.

 

Who whole scenario doesn't make a lick of sense.