But would we have been 10x more effective if we were given more via keeping it smaller?
Q (and us included) never go for the deep deep stuff, only the surface level stuff to avoid any conspiracy labels by mainstream outlet and thoughts.
But would we have been 10x more effective if we were given more via keeping it smaller?
Q (and us included) never go for the deep deep stuff, only the surface level stuff to avoid any conspiracy labels by mainstream outlet and thoughts.
It'll always be that argument of, "How much is too much?"
>Truth would put 99% in hospital
Would it? What if the actual result was only 12%? Or even lower?
Do you really need to constantly play chess with the DS and their never ending games and lies? Is the bandaid approach that heavy?
Time to go over some older stuff. I forgot all about this one.
>POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure optical reasons
Then what of the EBS?
Do we have a time and place where HRC was last spotted?
Well well.
God help us digging for digs on a galactic scale.
>YOU MEAN YOU'RE NOT UP TO DATE ON THE ENTIRE CIVIL WAR CONSPIRACY OF ANJULA-X AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON ANDROMEDA'S BORDER?
ugggghhhhhh
What's the confirm on HRC running in this year in Biden's place?
Seems about right, otherwise what point would there be for the HRC vid and its drop timing?
Feels like everyone knows deep down that there's no 2020 election.