Jim Jordan took donation money from Google.

He says he needs it to win back the House in November.

They all have "good" reasons to take money from Big Tech, it seems.

I don't like it.

Maybe there are reasons, why nothing is getting done to stop censorship.

Taking money from Google and saying that you're against Google is not really believable.

It's like getting money (and taking it) from the Koch brothers and then claiming that you are fighting them.

This is a real letdown, imo.

Vid:

"Tucker grills Jim Jordan on why he took campaign donations from Google"

>>10160695

I'm disappointed.

>>10160700

>Because you don't understand how political campaign financing works.

Maybe you are the one, who doesn't (want to) understand how political financing works.

They call it political financing in the US.

In other countries it's just called bribery.

"Follow the money" is advice from Q, and we did it here for years.

But when someone, we all like, takes money from Google, it has suddenly to mean the opposite?

I don't think so.

How can you accuse the left to be in bed with their financiers but when it is someone from the Republican side just reverse your logic?

This is not honest reasoning.

>>10160810

Fox is not a Trump supporting channel,

but the question needs to be asked,

why did Trump claim that he would open the

JFK files, but doesn't do this?

>>10161186

Why would you claim she's Hitler's mother?

She's not.