>>10153364 (PB)

Until it is based on solid knowledge, your opinion doesn't matter. You could start by reading post >>10153287 DIRECTLY above (you obviously did NOT read it because you show no understanding of it) and, if that awakens your remaining neuron, then turn your limited attention to "Unrestricted Warfare" by Col. Qiao Liang and Col. Wang Xiangsui ... translated from the original PLA documents.

If it's not at your local library. ask for an inter-library search. If it's not there, buy it.

Stop walking around ignorant.

Musk is correct. The Chinese are, in general, more energized ... and why not? Their country is winning while western nations are whining. If we (all western nations) do not evict the invaders, using whatever force is necessary, we are doomed.

<rantTime after time after time we refer to the Alinsky Papers and "Prairie Progress" and to the videos of Russian spies and Soros and to The Fourth Turning and "Unrestricted Warfare" and Hayek's "Road To Serfdom" and writings of our own intelligence agencies, but you fuckers are too goddam smart and arrogant to do the actual fucking homework. The referrals have been spread out and repeated over YEARS and still you have not taken the hints, but talk like you know it all. YOU DO NOT. Buck up and get with the program. Musk just told you that your ass has gotten soft and you are about to be genocided. And he's correct, but damned few of you could get past the childish taunts because you have not gotten your entitled head out of your entitled asses. Oldfags have been showing you the way for years. You can taunt us with "Okay, Boomer" -- but we did the homework while you dreamed of being social media celebrities.

It will be to your own destruction.

I'm okay with that ... if you choose ignorance, death is a reasonable result ... but YOUR ignorance imperils ME, too. And THAT is NOT OKAY.</rant>

>>10161674

Her best option is if Trump wins handily.

>>10161666

I see the trips. But there is no need to "spin" this. It's what happened.

>>10161699

It DID close down the hottest economy in the world and it DID set aside the recent trade negotiations with the US (oddly enough, there was a "pandemic" clause AND it's clear that the WHO is in the control of the CCP.)

Since it killed relatively few Chinese while dealing a crushing economic blow to the rest of the world (at a time when China was struggling and becoming less competitive), I'd say it was wildly effective.

>>10161364

Chip is a liar. Period. He's not a blue check so if he wants, he can sue me for defamation. I'd be happy to kick his ass in court and take everything he has except for his skanky wife and mousy kids.

>>10161727

But still of legal age. Not a pervert.

>>10161419

Bonaparte was too short, too. So was Genghis Khan.

Your point?

>>10161421

No blue check? Seems odd.