Anonymous ID: ceb02c April 12, 2018, 4:30 p.m. No.1017523   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7569 >>7702 >>7847 >>7896

>>1017327

My conjecture about it all is

Twatter went down a short while when/because some thing/injection happened.

Twatter came back up again in a jiffy but was left crippled censorwise.

Dunno if this makes sense, but I surmise some Snowden wizzardry to enable us to unload our guns big time. Memes were asked just before that, no?

Redpill the hell out of them.

Make of it what you want, but this is my take on things.

Go Q team Go!

And TY from the world at large.

Anonymous ID: ceb02c April 12, 2018, 4:43 p.m. No.1017684   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1017649

Come to think of it, they take the censor-filter off of twatter we have a good go at it and make a jolly good show out of it > they will then claim the well-foundedness of the censorship on just that. Sense or nonsense?

Anonymous ID: ceb02c April 12, 2018, 5:12 p.m. No.1017976   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1017847

Says who?

I think it's posts like yours shittin up the bread.

I clearly stated that it is MY TAKE on this.

The shill is you. Were are YOUR notable posts, dude?

You want sauce, go have a wank, if not, go do something useful, you whining concernfag.

21 posts already in this bread and NOTHING to offer us so far. Way to go.

Anonymous ID: ceb02c April 12, 2018, 5:20 p.m. No.1018048   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1017896

Hey TY for taking the time to enlighten us here.

Appreciated, we're not all techies around here but we like learning.

I hadn't a clue really, a silly theory is all I had. My bad.

Anonymous ID: ceb02c April 12, 2018, 5:25 p.m. No.1018106   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1017896

But still, some new software features -like lack of censorship- could have been injected/updated,no?

Pure conjecture, I agree. I only go on what has been reported mind you.

Anyway, not important, could even be considered a slide/diversion, for all I know.

TY anyway for clarification, anon.