Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 4:49 p.m. No.10173642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3715

TOD BROWNING'S FREAKS - (1931)Trailer

 

The ULTIMATE Horror Film

 

No introduction really necessary. One of the most daring pictures ever made at the time and a breakthrough moment in Horror and Exploitation film history.

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 4:54 p.m. No.10173680   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The pushers of Technocracy push with their narratives, and we get nudged into conforming with their vision of the world which they decided for us SHEEP

Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness

 

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3450744-nudge

 

From the winner of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Economics, Richard H. Thaler, and Cass R. Sunstein: a revelatory look at how we make decisions

 

New York Times bestseller

Named a Best Book of the Year by The Economist and the Financial Times

 

Every day we make choices—about what to buy or eat, about financial investments or our children’s health and education, even about the causes we champion or the planet itself. Unfortunately, we often choose poorly. Nudge is about how we make these choices and how we can make better ones. Using dozens of eye-opening examples and drawing on decades of behavioral science research, Nobel Prize winner Richard H. Thaler and Harvard Law School professor Cass R. Sunstein show that no choice is ever presented to us in a neutral way, and that we are all susceptible to biases that can lead us to make bad decisions. But by knowing how people think, we can use sensible “choice architecture” to nudge people toward the best decisions for ourselves, our families, and our society, without restricting our freedom of choice.

 

Drink this, Honey, it's GOOD for you. Mommy says so!

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 4:59 p.m. No.10173723   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3738

The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond

 

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/

 

We stand on the brink of a technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, and relate to one another. In its scale, scope, and complexity, the transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before. We do not yet know just how it will unfold, but one thing is clear: the response to it must be integrated and comprehensive, involving all stakeholders of the global polity, from the public and private sectors to academia and civil society.

 

The First Industrial Revolution used water and steam power to mechanize production. The Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and information technology to automate production. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution is building on the Third, the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.

 

There are three reasons why today’s transformations represent not merely a prolongation of the Third Industrial Revolution but rather the arrival of a Fourth and distinct one: velocity, scope, and systems impact. The speed of current breakthroughs has no historical precedent. When compared with previous industrial revolutions, the Fourth is evolving at an exponential rather than a linear pace. Moreover, it is disrupting almost every industry in every country. And the breadth and depth of these changes herald the transformation of entire systems of production, management, and governance.

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:02 p.m. No.10173753   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4006 >>4199 >>4326

From Lockdowns to "The Great Reset"

 

https://mises.org/wire/lockdowns-great-reset

 

The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order. Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), global policymakers are advocating for a “Great Reset” with the intent of creating a global technocracy. It is not by coincidence that on October 18, 2019, in New York City the WEF participated in “Event 201” at the “high-level” pandemic exercise organized by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.

 

This coming technocracy involves close cooperation between the heads of the digital industry and of governments. With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all, the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice.

 

The truth, however, is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system. The People’s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals, corporations, and sociopolitical entities.

 

For the individual, one’s identity is reduced to an app or chip that registers almost any personal activity. In order to gain a few individual rights, and be it only to travel to a certain place, a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “good behavior” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment. For example, during a pandemic, this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for a job or to travel.

 

It is, in short, a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development. Like the mechanical engineer with a machine, the social engineer—or technocrat—treats society as an object. Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times, the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design. For this purpose, the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer follows the laws of nature. Behavioral theory has reached a stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible. The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force, but subtly by nudge.

 

Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset, the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state. "The experts know better" is the justification.

 

And after you read that, check this article too

 

The Elite Technocrats Behind The Global ‘Great Reset’

 

https://www.technocracy.news/the-elite-technocrats-behind-the-global-great-reset/

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:08 p.m. No.10173803   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3821

How The “Great Reset” Is Targeting Our Children & Plans To “Reimagine” Humanity

 

https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/07/13/how-the-great-reset-is-targeting-our-children-plans-to-reimagine-humanity/

 

As we find ourselves in this new normal, we have seen longstanding agendas, which have remained behind the scenes, hidden away from the public, now being offered as solutions justified by this crisis.

 

The World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” and the “4th Industrial Revolution” are perfect examples of prepackaged “solutions” being rolled out to save us from ourselves. Today we will dive deeper into this agenda and also focus on how it may reshape our lives if the technocrats have their way.

 

In this episode, Spiro is joined by John Klyczek, an Adjunct Professor, researcher, contributor to Activist Post as well as several other alternative news sites, and the author of the book School World Order: The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education.

 

For generations the social engineers have used the strategy of indoctrination to target society’s most impressionable minds, our children, through many avenues but primarily through our education systems. In this interview, Spiro and John Klyczek break down how this longstanding and effective tactic is being “reimagined” by the usual suspects, to reshape the future of humanity.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JI9C6psZf62r/

 

Click URL above to view the video on BitChute

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:16 p.m. No.10173873   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3957

Distance Education and Innovation

A Proposed Rule by the Education Department on 04/02/2020

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/02/2020-05700/distance-education-and-innovation

 

SUMMARY:

The Secretary proposes to amend the general, establishing eligibility, maintaining eligibility, and losing eligibility sections of the Institutional Eligibility regulations issued under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), related to distance education and innovation. In addition, the Secretary proposes to amend the Student Assistance General Provisions regulations issued under the HEA.

 

https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/35720-coronavirus-sidelining-teachers-moving-education-online

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:17 p.m. No.10173879   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3885 >>4343

"The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come: a permanent state of fear, strict behavioral control, massive loss of jobs, and growing dependence on the state."

Anyone who wants to take an hour or so to study the workings and goals of the Frankfort School will comprehend that the CoVID charade was a designed break-point in the entire 75-100 year game plan. Its process will now enter its 25 year "adjustment phase," as children are fully indoctrinated; traditional and natural immunity medicine are forcibly replaced by pharmaceutical/chemical control for purposes of health and targeted elimination; warehousing and benign neutralization of those deemed non-conforming; and institution of a tightly controled social structure of conforming behavioral patterns (think: 5-minute hate). All of the members of the Frankfort School are of the same group, as were all of the families that underwrote the Federal Reserve - which made possible the siphoning of American wealth for the last century and the Covid charade itself. That said - it cannot be discussed.

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:17 p.m. No.10173885   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10173879

Ayn Rand divided the world into "producers" and "looters." Looters were those who took the fruits of what the producers made, usually using the coercive authority of giverment to facilitate their theft. Their theft is often accompanied by notions of how they "need" what giverment takes from others (think: Marx's notion of "from each according to his deed to each according to his need"). Producers are society's entrepreneurial engine – they produce ideas, make stuff, improve things, etc.

 

John Galt was Ayn Rand's example of a producer who led other producers in a strike of sorts to deny an increasingly corrupt society of looters of the fruits of producers' efforts. "Go Galt" is often referred to as shorthand for John Galt's withdrawal to a remote area in Colorado (Galt's Gultch) where producers could distance themselves from the looters.

 

Producers and looters sound like your description of the Remnant and the masses

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:19 p.m. No.10173903   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Did the Lockdowns Save Thousands of Lives? A Soho Forum Debate

 

Physician Marty Makary vs. epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski on whether "the lockdown saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of lives."

 

Full Text and Links:

 

https://reason.com/video/did-the-lockdowns-save-thousands-of-lives-a-soho-forum-debate/

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:21 p.m. No.10173916   🗄️.is 🔗kun

You guys need to pay attention do what the BANKS are saying! Which is FUNNY since BANKS are now also health experts!

 

As the infection curve starts to resurge in many countries, signaling the next wave, we examine whether the time to arrive at the peak is similar in both the first and second waves. Conceptually, we develop a hypothesis on shorter potential lifespan for the infection curve as the curve moves into the next waves.

 

In our view, the concept of decay in ‘half-life’, i.e. the time required for a quantity to reduce to half, could be applicable to picturing the next waves.

 

We think (1) better secondary infection rate control, (2) large mobility tracing and more voluntary testing; and, (3) shorter recovery periods could drive a shorter curve peak.

 

It is not necessarily so that if more people are infected, a larger part of society would have antibodies and that this would flatten the curve. We note that, in most countries – both developed and developing – the size of infection is only 0.2-0.5% of the total population.

 

Even if we were to assume about 5x higher unreported infection cases, this is still relatively small. Also, “ring vaccination” is not a strategy yet, as so far we do not have a vaccine widely available for the public.

Well… This is the BANK of the Secular Ruling Family MORGAN. JPM!

 

So pay attention fellow slaves, the Owners are Talking!

Anonymous ID: f1f386 Aug. 3, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.10173941   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4315

A Closer Look At Ghislaine Maxwell's Relationship With Jeffery Epstein

 

Alana Goodman, co-author of "Convenient Death: The Mysterious Demise of Jeffrey Epstein" joined the Daily Caller's Stephanie Hamill to discuss the latest with Epstein's Alleged Madam Ghislaine Maxwell and to share her discoveries about Epstein while writing the book.