Remember when Maxine Waters told us that Obama had a database

Of all their enemies

So that when Hillary won the Presidency

All those people could be dealt with?

How did he get the names for the database?

I mean, how could he be sure who was an enemy?

Perhaps he was using the FISA court long before the elections.

When theHammer Comes Downsomeone is sure to get BASHed!

Status Update – DOJ/FBI Investigative Research on The Road…

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/08/03/status-update-doj-fbi-investigative-research-on-the-road/

USAO John Bash – Lots of discussion amid multiple circles about what West Texas USAO John Bash might be looking into. Is he looking back in time into the FISA(702) abuses that took place during the 2016 primary season?…. That would be in addition to the familiar “unmasking” aspect?… and, if yes, what would that indicate?

Short answer is: no-one is certain. AG Barr did mention that Bash is looking backward on the unmasking issues beyond the timeline scope of the 2016 presidential election. That would indicate surveillance “unmasking” and FISA “minimization” would meld because essentially the terms are synonymous depending on the type of intelligence exploitation.

Prior Obama officials were “unmasking” names associated with FBI investigations simply to dirty them up to give fuel to the fraudulent basis of “Trump-Russia”; that’s the political weaponization of intelligence. This did happen and Bash is cited with authority to review this carve-out of the ongoing DOJ investigation into DOJ/FBI intelligence manipulation.

However, if Bash is going into the issues of the NSA database being exploited for political opposition research via FISA-702 authorities (the intentional extraction of information with intentional non-minimization) well, that’s a more expansive kettle-of-fish than would seem to be possible to fully outline before the November election.

>>10175741

>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214540018301269

Abstract

Impaired cellular energy metabolism is the defining characteristic of nearly all cancer regardless of cellular or tissue origin. The replacement of respiration by fermentation (glycolysis) can be a symptom of cancer and not the cause. Aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells involves elevated glucose uptake with lactic acid production in the presence of oxygen. Warburg recognized that oxygen consumption is not diminished in tumor cells, instead, respiration is altered because glycolysis persists in the presence of oxygen. The uniqueness of the intrinsic property of melanin to dissociate the water molecule, like chlorophyll in plants, through the dissociation of the water molecule, opens a new era in the current landscape of reactive medicine. This means that glucose is the universal precursor of any organic matter of the body, but it cannot provide the energy that its own metabolism requires. The necessary energy, defined as everything that produces any change, our body takes from light through water dissociation. In humans is through melanin, in plants by mean of chlorophyll. Biomarkers of photosynthetic activity of human body can be assessed by enzymatic activities of catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase; glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase. The defects in the generation and distribution of energy are not readily detectable. Pollutants and other stresses can produce symptoms that mimic or conceal damage caused by polluted air, contaminated water, metals, pesticides, fertilizers, herbicides, industrial waste, drugs, etc.

I can't get a PDF of this article, but a related article on melanin is attached as PDF