the only way thus far deemed possible for the mind to accept an inception is if the subconscious is "comfortable" with the "person" planting the seed … so, then, the question becomes: *() is whom?
D. J. T.: have an answer for me?
the only way thus far deemed possible for the mind to accept an inception is if the subconscious is "comfortable" with the "person" planting the seed … so, then, the question becomes: *() is whom?
D. J. T.: have an answer for me?
tulsi: marker
neuro-linguistic programming: <25% effective; base is barren
hotline bling … tracking? tracing?
regardless of the musings of "Majic 12" on shitter: the messenger verifies the message … "you" know it
bigger than you can imagine
once it happens: your "leverage" is compromised?
militarily: probably saying can not happen
however: "nature's god" as they wrote: ?
fascinating chat over a cup of java … however: it would need to involve the messenger
twenty-two
mark:7:33-35.
ask the questions none are asking
>I'm beginning to think the Q team are the infiltrators.