>>10193508 lb
>>10193403 lb
im seeing 2 different pics here. the sauced pic from 8/1/20 only shows one ship at ground zero. looks like the smaller ship from the twitter pic
https://www.planet.com/stories/beirut-MOMNlzIGg
sauce the before pic anon. cause its different than the one i sauced.
https://www.planet.com/stories/beirut-MOMNlzIGg
amazing how you have to reply with something irrelevant to the content in my post to push what ever it is your pushing, huh? got something moar than just sarcastic quotations to add to the conversation?
so you have nothing. gotcha.
your before pic was taken by a different company. Maxar Technologies. apparently they dont have their own website, cause i cant sauce them. but the first search result comes from a gatekeeper at
https://gisuser.com/2020/08/beirut-explosion-maxar-technologies-before-and-after-satellite-imagery/
and the before pic is undated. i wouldnt trust it till we can determine the date.
congratulations stupid. when Q said "we are the news". this isnt what he meant. keep trying, keep failing.
next talking point:
it wasnt even a bomb.
https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/7kpdxz/conspiracy-theorists-adamantly-insist-beirut-explosion-was-a-nuke-it-wasnt
https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/wxq7gn/trump-fuels-conspiracy-theories-by-claiming-beirut-explosion-was-caused-by-a-bomb
derp. ok. so that pic is a day older than the planet.com one. and apparently show the departure of one of the ships days before the explosion
this is the one and only reply you'll ever get from me namefagging shill
sauce is sauce. since when is one enemy media outlet suddenly not relevant?
apparently detecting sarcasm isnt your super power.
does JA have to answer those questions though? he can probably claim freedom of press if he doesnt want to answer
kys anjel