Want to correlate date/time of Sicily radiation spike reported in LB with date/time of Beirut explosion.

>>10194263 lb

Let's try to correlate the date/time.

1. According to USGS EQ website

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000b9bx/executive

'''the Beirut Explosion happened

on 2020-August-04 at 15:08:18 UTC'''

1. radmon.org uses what time zone to graph its data?

Searched the web.

Searched radmon.org/blog

searched radmon.org/news

They do not state anywhere what time zone their data is normalized to.

The date appears to be 04-08-2020

which is August 4, 2020

The time of the intial spike appears to be

around 13:45 in some time zone.

Can anybody help obtain the data we need to see if this crowd-sourced reported radiation spike (continuing at about 10x background level or more) correlates with the Beirut Explosion?

It would also be nice to know what kind of radiation they are measuring - gamma would arrive very quickly, alpha and beta would arrive later because they are particles.

>>10194475

OK so by the fact that it spiked, you are inferring that the instrument was measuring gamma rays only. Makes sense.

So the transit time of gamma rays from Beirut to Sicily should be around 0.0 seconds more or less (speed of light).

So the time stamp ought to correlate almost perfectly, IF that Sicily crowd-sourced station's data is accurate and not reflecting some kind of local condition.

Amirite?

>>10194505

And if the time on the radmon.org graph DOESN'T correlate with the Beirut explosion, then we can probably assume it's not measuring something that arrived from Beirut.

>>10194583

Spell Beirut

Add to

>>10194418 Beruit: Digs on the huge background radation spike recorded in Italy

>>10194475

>>10194505

>>10194597

>>10194599

So if anons conclude that the reported radiation spike in Sicily does NOT correlate with the Beirut explosion, then none of this is notable at all.

>>10194529

McVeigh

>>10194642

Do this for us, anon. Find out what time zone the radmon.org data for Sicily is reported in.

See

>>10194617 and all the links to it in this bread.

>>10194704

That would be NO, HELL NO, and FUCK NO.

>>10194683

Anon, yelling ad hominem attacks is not helpful. I'm digging trying to ascertain facts. Facts are hard to come by. I have no agenda other than finding the truth.

You are conflating different individuals here too by calling them all the same names.