Anonymous ID: 3e869c Aug. 5, 2020, 7:28 p.m. No.10195620   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5650 >>5657

>>10195494

Alternatively… Why do people think nuclear weapons are something that can't be 'wasted?'

 

I think the answer to a lot of this is more mundane than nuclear weapons - yet also more damning in the long run, but more difficult to explain. It's not the "aha!" Moment of coming across a grand conspiracy to blow up a warehouse.

 

We know hezbollah and related terrorist groups manufacture weapons. Ammonium nitrate is a key compound used in rockets and explosives. A Russian/Ukranian guy could send a ship down to one of these ports (or a captain could just defect with the cargo), the local authorities could seize it (and who knows what the paperwork says they found) - it goes into storage and can then be pilfered from as a strategic supply for manufacturing to produce less-crude IEDs or even some proper munitions grade explosives.

 

What we are seeing unfold throughout the middle east with sabotage incidents is likely two prong. First - the media is suddenly reporting on industrial accidents and/or they have entered the public sphere of discussion so as to cloud which events are acts of sabotage and which ones are just run of the mill accidents.

The second part of it is that there are likely a number of shadow ops being carried out to shut down supply and manufacture for various terrorist groups and it is likely multinational with black ops doing their thing (and it doesn't really matter who your sponsoring nation is in black ops - you run across people who do things and their sponsoring nations give them slack in their leashes).

 

It could also be that the whole plot to import fertilizer and store it in such a way was the attack, itself - and all that needed to be done was assign some hapless welders to go do a job and set things in motion.

 

I lean more heavily toward the first idea - but the second is also plausible.

Anonymous ID: 3e869c Aug. 5, 2020, 7:28 p.m. No.10195622   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10195494

Alternatively… Why do people think nuclear weapons are something that can't be 'wasted?'

 

I think the answer to a lot of this is more mundane than nuclear weapons - yet also more damning in the long run, but more difficult to explain. It's not the "aha!" Moment of coming across a grand conspiracy to blow up a warehouse.

 

We know hezbollah and related terrorist groups manufacture weapons. Ammonium nitrate is a key compound used in rockets and explosives. A Russian/Ukranian guy could send a ship down to one of these ports (or a captain could just defect with the cargo), the local authorities could seize it (and who knows what the paperwork says they found) - it goes into storage and can then be pilfered from as a strategic supply for manufacturing to produce less-crude IEDs or even some proper munitions grade explosives.

 

What we are seeing unfold throughout the middle east with sabotage incidents is likely two prong. First - the media is suddenly reporting on industrial accidents and/or they have entered the public sphere of discussion so as to cloud which events are acts of sabotage and which ones are just run of the mill accidents.

The second part of it is that there are likely a number of shadow ops being carried out to shut down supply and manufacture for various terrorist groups and it is likely multinational with black ops doing their thing (and it doesn't really matter who your sponsoring nation is in black ops - you run across people who do things and their sponsoring nations give them slack in their leashes).

 

It could also be that the whole plot to import fertilizer and store it in such a way was the attack, itself - and all that needed to be done was assign some hapless welders to go do a job and set things in motion.

 

I lean more heavily toward the first idea - but the second is also plausible.

Anonymous ID: 3e869c Aug. 5, 2020, 7:43 p.m. No.10195755   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5796 >>5801 >>5804

>>10195696

Radiation spikes can mean a lot of things. Concrete is of elevated radiation relative to background because moat of it is made using coal fly ash, which is rich enough in Uranium to be considered a potential nuclear proliferation risk.

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

 

The headline is a little clickbaity since they are referring to properly shielded nuclear waste, but the point still stands.

 

That explosion was very unlikely to be a nuclear explosion. The primary source of radiation in a nuclear blast is radioactive iodine made as a part of the fission and fusion byproducts. This is why iodine tablets are used to combat radiation, as saturating the thyroid with iodine prior to exposure to radioactive isotopes helps prevent uptake and storage of radioactive isotopes in the thyroid.

Anonymous ID: 3e869c Aug. 5, 2020, 7:49 p.m. No.10195823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5868

>>10195725

Q was not coming to us for help. That was never the point. Q was relaying a message to let types like myself weigh options for these times. IE - specifically to present us with the option to not topple the U.S. government. We already came to the conclusion long ago that we would move during this time to effectively do just that - collapse the government, kill pretty much everyone in politics, and convene a constitutional convention to re-form the nation.

 

Q and the President have presented an option. I am weighing it, but am generally siding with the original plan. The next couple months will tell all.