>>10195823 (pb)
This is very close to my sentiments. I wonder how vulnerable we will be, however, if there is an actual kinetic civil war while outside entities seek advantage.
I am firmly of the non-violent stance as espoused here on this board. The math only changes for me if the act of violence is in self-defense. That would be the case, for example, if certain "public health" folks decide to forcibly vaccinate the populace. At that point I would consider violent defense of my own body or those of vulnerable people to be legitimate self-defense.
The only reason I have not wanted a complete overthrow of what I consider at this point to be an illegitimate, traitorous "government" is the concern that what followed could be even worse. I appreciate the Trump administration because I see it as our opportunity to work towards an acceptable resolution of our troubles. I believe that there are a number of political types whose treasonous acts are so great as to make their deaths a needed aspect of justice unfolding. Military tribunals as opposed to citizens taking justice into their own hands seems preferable.
Best case for me: No new "government" of man. Liberation by the return of the King. Jesus my savior.