>>10195878

This is an incorrect assumption.

Q does not need evidence for courts as the courts will never prosecute. That is impossible. At best, the military can prosecute under tribunal - in which case the process for determining guilt does not revolve around how information is collected or submitted.

Think more simply. Would people believe if Trump stood up and said: "the military will be prosecuting criminals for crimes using evidence we have collected secretly?"

Of course not. The people must come to question reality and their role in the world. The public must believe there are crimes to be investigated - that there is something wrong with the established system.

Q did not need our help to uncover evidence. Q simply needed the question to be injected into the system. Over 90% of all content on the internet has its origins in boards like halfchan - which is precisely why Q showed up there in the first place.

Q knew that it would take only days, if not hours, for the posts to go from 4chan to the conversations of politically active forums everywhere and from there would embed itself into the conversation, permanently.

Q successfully gave the impression that she was frequently in the company of President Trump, though President Trump was no doubt aware of Q before we were.

Remember that Q is not here to be our pen pal. Q is here to achieve the ends of special warfare.

All of this was well defined in advance.

>>10196008

It's plausible - but I am somewhat skeptical that the President is sending out the military to arrest protesters. I think we would see more of a media or halfchan blip on that - rumors coming out of the area at the very least of some kind of major operation.

It's possible there was a roundup of clandestine operators who no one would be able to report missing if we nabbed them, but I somewhat doubt that, as well.

If I had to guess, the President is pointing out that the local government ceased support of the rioters, or otherwise declined to provide protection for them because the extortion wasn't working.

>>10196073

One must wonder if it could work in reverse as a direct ethanol-to-electric fuel cell, though.

I have been looking into experimenting with a cobalt tetroxide fuel cell for direct metabolizing of sugars. The team also used a surprisingly simple means of constructing a 3d graphene scaffold using nickel foam.

Came out of a college in singapore

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236654034_Enzymeless_multi-sugar_fuel_cells_with_high_power_output_based_on_3D_graphene-Co3O4_hybrid_electrodes

>>10196162

Efficiently converting 1+3 into 4 by using 5-1 as opposed to 10-6 is something to be proud of.

It just means that we have a means of, potentially, directly converting carbon dioxide to a liquid fuel without needing to use a plant intermediary.

IE - fossil fuels become renewable fuels.

>>10196242

Agreed for the most part. At least in the present state of the world and power grid. Widespread nuclear power would make it a convenient means of deriving liquid fuels for applications where nuclear power was impractical.

Some form of solar that is truly next generation in panel efficiency and cost could flip that equation.

Wind is… One of those weird investments. If I am going for something off-grid and reliable (say a data center backup or cell tower backup), then it makes much more sense to just double-down retard hard on solar than to go with a wind turbine. Though I am talking hardcore survival goals - like you want a nuclear-hardened comms grid or something that won't need to rely on a diesel fuel supply line and can just operate completely headless in the event of a decapitation.

I always think of stuff like that and really feel I missed the train to the proper place of employ within the military industrial complex.

>>10196166

Do you not remember the "Lynn" exchange and how the two bantered?

That should not only give you some indication of where Q is placed in things, but also the scale of what is going on.

Asian stories often feature the heirs and heiresses of gangs, corporations, nations, etc. If you have power, you earn a seat at the table not because they want you at the table, but because they can't remove you from the table.

You should look up Kakegurui. Or Kill la Kill. Or Eden's Zero. People often think that ghost-writers are the inexperienced and unskilled. The process benefits those who don't like to be named.

But you likely know this already. Or are irrelevant.

>>10196221

If it was a nuclear explosion, it would be one of the most complete we have ever seen in terms of the release of radioactive material.

All known nuclear weapons leave behind radioactive Cesium 137.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesium-137

As a microfine dust that settles into the soil and precipitates through rain. It chemically replaces potassium in plants and makes them, particularly fruits, radioactive.

There should be more signs if it was a nuclear weapon we are familiar with.

Incomplete explosions should see a dusting of the area in Uranium 235 or Plutonium. Possibly a cobalt variety.

We should start seeing signs of radiation exposure in the population within the coming days/weeks if that was truly the case.

>>10196497

I did have the thought that it could have been triggered by a torpedo from the harbor. As a sort of long-shot idea.

I trend toward the idea that a stockpile of ammonium nitrate detonating from the center will naturally produce the explosion profile we see…. It's the "from the center" part that is key and the question of just how naturally it occurred.

The plant was on fire well before the explosion, and the way explosions work is that the shockwave stresses the crystalline arrangement of molecules and causes them to rapidly decompose. An explosive would have almost immediately detonated the stockpile whereas a fire tends to destabilize everything over time before something finally snaps.

>>10196576

This would be even worse in terms of radioactive fallout. The instability of the atoms is what is being harnessed as energy. Radioactive isotopes are part of that 10% of the energy which isn't converted, a weapon that uses even less than 90% will scatter even more radioactive compounds around.

>>10196590

There was a picture of a warehouse in beirut filled with ammonium nitrate bags and a couple guys welding on the door.

I would hazard a guess that had something to do with it. The question is - who knew the ammonium nitrate was there and why would they assign people to weld on it.