Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 9:47 p.m. No.10196724   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6905

As far as reasons for the bombing I would say the single biggest piece of information is right here:

 

http://archive.fo/SAEZq

 

"AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - The Special Tribunal for Lebanon on Wednesday said it would postpone its verdict in the trial over the 2005 bombing that killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri to August 18, following the huge explosion in Beirut's port on Tuesday.

 

The United Nations-backed court located outside The Hague, Netherlands, was due to give a verdict in the trial of four men who are accused in the deaths of Hariri and 21 others this Friday.

 

The verdict has been delayed "out of respect for the countless victims of the devastating explosion that shook Beirut on 4 August, and the three-days of public mourning in Lebanon," the court's registry said in a statement.

 

Before the explosion that rocked Beirut on Tuesday, the country had been bracing for the verdict in the case of the men charged with planning and arranging the bombing 15 years ago.

 

The four defendants, who are not in custody and are being tried in absentia, are linked to Lebanon's Shia Islamist group Hezbollah."

 

So before the bombing the four were due to be tried but did you notice "in absentia"? In other words, they are being tried, and yet aren't even in custody of the authorities. So I think it is very safe to say the two issues are linked.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 9:59 p.m. No.10196799   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6856

>>10196738

I have two opinions on this and cannot decide on which one is more plausible.

 

1) Israel: In my opinion, throwing everything aside in regards to history of the two countries, I have found the response to be very odd from a variety of sources including President Trump, Secretary Esper, PM Netanyahu, the media, the shills (who always tell us things even when they try not to), and the current narrative being pushed. It just feels to me like there is an issue going on behind the scenes between two camps in Israel vying for power. One connected to the recent riots/protests in Israel (Marxist/Zionist wing) and the other the pro western wing. I am not going to explain this particular issue further until/unless I have more information as it would be pure speculation.

 

2) Hezbollah/Iran: If we look at this from a "who gains the most" angle then Iran and Hezbollah are top of that list in my opinion given recent actions taken against them, given the court case about the assassination of the former Lebanon PM which is now delayed after this attack, and given the importance of the location in their conflict against Israel.

 

Given what we currently know those are the highest probably suspects in my personal opinion.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:08 p.m. No.10196852   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6866 >>6868 >>6899

Notice that the moment we begin discussing who was connected to the explosion and there were some very intelligent posts that the entire shill narrative shifted to showing tits and asking for anons who are female to show tits. We have seen this exact method before and it always takes place once we are over the X on something.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:12 p.m. No.10196879   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10196815

You know what, originally I thought the whole "I see a drop" narrative to be bullshit but the timing of sequence there makes that very interesting. It looks like a bird and doesn't seem to have a direct route but the timing of it going down and then the explosion is extremely suspicious for sure. We also know by the way that (at least) China uses drones that look like birds to spy on their citizens. They are called "dove drones".

 

I am not saying this was China even though they came to my mind right away when this happened due to this action being of massive benefit to them but I am saying that if China has these bird drones then that means others do as well.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:14 p.m. No.10196895   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6909 >>6913

>>10196868

Always the same tactics, always the same response when called out. You make yourselves so obvious and this method has always been the go to slide method shills use on nightshift as several different IDs work in tandem to push the narrative to that topic and off whatever particular research is over the mark.

 

If you truly were a legitimate anon you wouldn't be interested in tits right now and would be focused on the narrative which is important, yet all your posts are directed at the exact same thing, tits. You always give yourselves away even when you think you don't or try to shift blame elsewhere since all one need do is look at your post history

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:19 p.m. No.10196930   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6946 >>6970 >>7005

>>10196909

And as I stated, they always work in teams to push the narrative through different IDs. See what I mean anons, this ID here had nothing to do with the reply I made and yet this is the ID that replied and is the same ID helping the other ID to push that narrative.

 

Just a suggestion to the operator behind this shill ID, it's been years now dude, years. While your handlers have studied our methods we have also studied yours and other methods by other groups. If you truly believe that real researching anons cannot see through these methods then you either think we are completely idiotic or your handler truly has no idea how to properly conduct a disinformation campaign.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:22 p.m. No.10196945   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10196913

Typically I wouldn't care about the shills and ignore them but whenever I feel that they are actively, by their actions, proving we are over the mark I always make it a point to call it out before moving back to the important research. This is done not merely to call them out but for other more important reasons which I will not go into. But you're right, I said what needed to be said and there is no reason to further expose it.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:32 p.m. No.10197008   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7020 >>7028 >>7062

>>10196970

>and you know it.

No, I don't "know it" or I wouldn't have wrote what I wrote. You can claim whatever you wish about yourself but that means nothing to me as I do not know you personally and only a fool would trust the words of someone on the internet instead of what they are seeing with their own eyes.

 

Perhaps you are not a shill and maybe you just added some posts that made you appear like one, maybe that is the case, who knows. But what I do know is what I can clearly see and the patterns and methods used by the same tired and useless shill groups day in and day out, it never changes. Sometimes it is of great use to us even if they do their best to try to do the opposite, but there are certain narratives they spin that automatically make it obvious the intentions and make it very easy to identify and filter them. The same goes for their responses, those never change either because shills cannot critically think for themselves and must read off their script to respond which makes it all the more easy to identify and either expose or filter.

 

If you truly were and have been here and participated in the research then you would know how these methods work and because of that you would know I am right, but instead you are getting defensive and claiming I have a big ego, which I do, that has nothing at all to do with what I wrote which was spot on.

 

Either way, it makes no difference, do what you have to do.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:35 p.m. No.10197026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7033

>>10196992

Times of Israel are insinuating Russians:

 

"Lead-up to Beirut blast: A Russian businessman, a decrepit ship, a single spark"

 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/lead-up-to-beirut-blast-a-russian-businessman-a-decrepit-ship-a-single-spark/

 

This and your post go hand in hand with my earlier theory about an internal conflict taking place in Israel behind two groups vying for control.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:38 p.m. No.10197054   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7112

>>10196989

Remote viewing is not something one can cite as a legitimate method that can be proven. Is it interesting? Sure is. But have I ever seen anything about it that proves it is a serious and proven thing? Never.

 

That being said, I personally believe I have remote viewed through the years and have practiced it a hell of a lot and gotten quite good at this point. However, I cannot control it fully (where it looks) and it always presents itself in a much different way than these people claim so while I am fascinated by these stories and they are interesting I just can't take them seriously and always rely on what my eyes, ears and so on show me. Videos, documentation, and so on are what matter.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:44 p.m. No.10197090   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7106

>>10197033

It's difficult to not conclude that given the response. I have never been an anon to blame Israel for everything as those are some of the most annoying posts we see constantly here but in this case, hard not to conclude that given the responses by Israel. The only other option is Hezbollah/Iran given the recent court case against them which came from Lebanon, or China given their massive benefit of the port being destroyed. But from what I have seen I think the most likely suspect is Israel due to their responses to the event with Hezbollah/Iran coming in a close second due to the benefit to them and their usual methods to stop things such as that court case.

 

I just don't see what Israel would gain from the attack though and that is the one hold up I have with fully thinking it was them. As far as I can see they really had no reason and gain nothing by that particular attack so it makes it hard for me to fully feel it was them. So on one end you have the aftermath remarks/behavior seeming to point to one and then you have the benefit pointing to another. We need more data, there has to be something, a smoking gun as it were, that points to a reason this happened and that location and makes it obvious the blame is on one group. There has to be a recent current event which caused this, has to be, we just haven't found it yet

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:49 p.m. No.10197114   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7129

>>10197062

What I know is that not a single one of your posts has had even a single thing to do with any research or any recently related research. The only thing you are doing, literally only thing, is either attacking randomly, or defending yourself, or pushing some unrelated narrative. You can play whatever game you want but your post record speaks for itself.

 

I will give you credit though in that shills usually do not have the intellectual ability to counter anything other than what your partners are doing by short and repetitive pictures but you are able to at least attempt an intellectual narrative, so kudos on that. But you have no way around your post history, none, and it gives you and those like you away every single time because at the end of the day, your job is to do the exact thing you are doing, and because of that your posts will always show this and there is nothing you can say to change that. No matter how much you claim you are legitimate or no matter how many times you accuse others, your post history shows what you are.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:54 p.m. No.10197136   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7172

>>10197112

Looking glass is not remote viewing, that is a theory by some tin foils which has never been proven. Looking glass is much more likely to be an analytic tool using numerous different current events, behavioral patterns, and historic patterns to accurately predict future events.

 

In many ways I do the very same thing as I am sure other legitimate anons do as well in their daily life. However, our ability pales to see these patterns and roughly predict future events pale in comparison to what Looking Glass is likely capable of because it is likely machine based and can calculate millions of different potentials whereas a human mind like my own, even with LLI, can only calculate a few hundred, maybe a thousand at most. So looking glass can use all that data to accurately predict numerous different outcomes and what is needed to happen to sway a future to a different destination.

 

That is how I personally believe Looking Glass to be. Could be wrong but that always made the most sense to me.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 10:57 p.m. No.10197154   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10197100

This is likely their next move, I agree. They will conjure some bogus charges not to convict but to be able to run it in the media leading up to the election. I do not believe this is their final play as I still believe they are going to do something devastating and horrible but this is clearly what they are planning to do next - Shift the narrative off the incoming indictments and to a new made up narrative of charges. I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't even charge the POTUS but instead went after a family member.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 11:03 p.m. No.10197184   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10197165

Yeah based Jenna is involved in that and she has been going after the media and traffickers big time lately:

 

"The fact that @kevinroose cares more about ending the Q movement, rather than the incredible importance of the 35 million dollar grant President Trump is giving to help rehabilitate trafficking survivors, shows that the media is the enemy of the people."

 

https://twitter.com/jennajameson/status/1291102525253287937

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 11:06 p.m. No.10197201   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7277

>>10197172

Alright then humor me, let's hear it, tell me what I know nothing about and explain to me why I am wrong. This should be enjoyable to read considering you can't even create a low grade response and merely made an accusation. Go on then, dazzle us all with your intellect and show me how I am wrong.

 

Guarantee you respond with an insult or something that in no way can explain anything, guaranteed.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 11:21 p.m. No.10197292   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7306 >>7315 >>7321

This is really interestingbakerand anons. There is a massive chunk of land outside of Fort Hood that was purchased by China:

 

http://archive.fo/tTAjv

 

It makes me wonder if the dead soldiers from Fort Hood were being targeted and a CCP op had easy access given that large amount of land right by it.

Anonymous ID: f93b80 Aug. 5, 2020, 11:28 p.m. No.10197327   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7339 >>7340

>>10197315

The list as it stands:

 

March 1: Spc. Shelby Jones, 20, was shot and killed at a strip club near Fort Hood.

March 5: Spc. Christopher Sawyer, 29, was found unresponsive in his on-post residence.

March 14: Spc. Freddy Delacruz Jr., 23, was among three victims found dead of gunshot wounds at an off-base apartment complex.

April 22: Spc. Vanessa Guillรฉn, 20, was reported missing after working in one of the regimentโ€™s arms room. Her remains were found weeks later. A fellow soldier who was a suspect in her killing shot himself when confronted by local police.

May 18: Pfc. Brandon Rosecrans, 27, was found dead from a gunshot wound near his burning Jeep, about 13 miles from the base.

June 19: Pvt. Gregory Morales, 24. His skeletal remains were found off base, and foul play is suspected.

July 17: Pvt. Mejhor Morta, 27. His body was found unresponsive by a group of fishermen in the vicinity of Stillhouse Lake. Drowning is suspected, but the investigation is ongoing.