There isn't a doubt in my mind that this will continue past the election. That's been the strategy all along…keep Flynn on the sidelines until the Dems can retake the WH, because if he speaks it's over for them.
And I'm not even sure what they do to him if they actually won in Nov…seems to me they would have to silence him forever. Probably kill him in prison and say it was Covid.
Not officially, but effectively. Until the case is resolved, speaking openly and publicly would be harmful to his cause and any potential sentence, which is why there was such a delay in the sentencing. No attorney worth his/her salt would fail to advise him to keep silent.
>everyone
I can assure you in the deep red areas of this country there's not a chance in hell they could get away with this.
Whatever LG's situation is, anons need to keep in mind what Q states about the timing of hearings.
In order to apply maximum pressure and damage to those at the top and inflict, you need people talking on record. You don't accomplish that by being overly confrontational. When you have a witness who's prepared to lie or establish a timeline others might have to contradict, you want the witness comfortable and talking as much as possible.
Contrast this with how the Dems treated Barr. They wouldn't let him speak precisely b/c they knew he was going to tell the truth.
We want our witnesses to talk and hang themselves and/or others in the public view. And, to be frank, this whole line about "all talk/no action" is just a bunch of low-IQ nonsense being promulgated by poor chess players. WTF do you think the Senate is? They are not a law enforcement agency, and the best they can do is make criminal referrals…their hearings are ALWAYS public theater, the utility of which is affecting public opinion. And should they decide to make a criminal referral, the DOJ is going to set it to the bottom of the stack, especially since the Durham investigation (and now others, such as Bash), is already covering all of this. Anything that is said in the hearings can only help that investigation should a contradiction in testimony emerge.
Anons act like Graham or others should leap across the tables, tackle witnesses, and slap the cuffs on. You're here b/c of the complexity and the "nature of entrenchment," being told you're watching a movie and "MIL is the only way" and you expect Lindsey fucking Graham to "do something." Gimme a break…
Talking is ALL they can do.