kek
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1291416662059544576
At least we know who is behind Awakening Greatly youtube channel now.
Oh hey, namefag #4673564564
KEK
E HAS WENT FULL NAMEFAG. EXPECT A TWITTER SKREE IN 24 HOURS ON HOW Q AND POTUS WORSHIP SATAN
EAnon
BDAnon
NAnon
Patchfag
SAnon
FrankAnon
RAnon
Does it ever end?
>dont forget hollywoodanon
EAnon
BDAnon
NAnon
Patchfag
SAnon
FrankAnon
RAnon
HollywoodAnon
Meganon
FBIAnon
>You're conflating a bunch of entirely different people.
Right….
EAnon
BDAnon
NAnon
Patchfag
SAnon
FrankAnon
RAnon
HollywoodAnon
Meganon
FBIAnon
We should keep a running list of LarpAnons, and Large twitter accounts that got big off of Q and then turned on him.
I'll start
Educating Liberals
What other ones were there?
>>FBIanon
>
>- pre-Q
>
>- only posted over 2 days in 07/2017
>
>Prolly the only legit non-Q one in that list.
I actually agree with this, I think FBIAnon was legit.
"LarpAnon List'
EAnon
BDAnon
NAnon
Patchfag
SAnon
FrankAnon
RAnon
HollywoodAnon
Meganon
Twitter Faggots that turned on Q
Jerome Corsi
Educating Liberals
Mike Cernovich
Jack Posobiec
Sebastien Gorka
Eye the Spy 1.0
Eye the Spy 2.0
Eye The Spy 3.0
Thomas Wictor
Austin SteinLarp
help me complete the list
>When Q 1st hit /pol/ the initial word on the street was that it was FBIAnon coming back.
FBIAnon could have very well been a precursor
MedAnon during Seth Rich, but I'msurethey were legit.
This anon gets it
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1291421560658472960
>Remember the anon that warned to stay away from LV around the first of 10/17? Was that FBIanon?
Wow, I forgot all about that. Avoid area with black vans.
>That is a thing though. If by 500 you are in double digits and it isn't overnight, well you need to stop posting.
Like all shills, you ignore the context of the posts and find something to attack.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
>>10201172
>Just letting you know. "Overheard" the 500 thing reading comments between bakers.
I give 0 fucks what other bakers think, ask them, they'll tell you.
At least Freddy is somewhat comical, most shills are just sad.
kek