True. I still watched it on repeat 3x to make certain it wasn't a deep fake.
Gorka's a jealous cum guzzler. He's pissed his MAGA Coalition couldn't take down the movement. Either that, or he's really good at playing an incredible faggot. Either way, I'm fairly certain he gets his protein directly from the source.
OMG, an ]INTHEMATRIXXX[ JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE!!
Sara Ruth Ashcraft, herself, hasn't posted any evidence. She's also one of those that pushes the Schumann shit, and randomly asserts her opinion about busted pedo rings after they've been found and discussed by others. Pay close attention to how she does it. If she really knew all about these networks and how they run, she'd be at the forefront of giving anons leads on where to look, and what to dig on. Instead, she literally piggy-backs on other people's findings, and everyone goes "OMG, Thank you, Sara!"
As for the rest of your post, I agree. It could be a decoy narrative. There's no proof in any anon's hands or "offline archives" that any of these people are guilty of what they are being accused of. What anons do have are symbols, symbolism, and some accounts of people who've come back and said "Yes, looking back, I can see it's probably true". Not to mention the scores of accounts on twitter of HW personalities that have posted outlandish shit about eating babies, watching girls do splits, references to pizza, and other very coincidental shit that can absolutely be used as circumstantial evidence.
We know their associations. We know their "networks of people", so to speak. We do not, and should probably NEVER possess any solid evidence; especially of the nature of the crimes in which they are being accused. If any/most/all of it is true, they will get their day in court, the truth will come out, and the public will learn.
Sorry, that's not evidence. That's someone's word of mouth. Kappy also never produced a scintilla of evidence. Kappy's death could also have been a massive slide to send us off the real scent. And if you think HW is beyond either killing someone outright, or faking that someone's death, you haven't been paying much attention.
The flight logs are the best thing we got. Again, we know the networks of people involved in some fairly recognizable names. We do NOT have any evidence to convict any of these people of the accusations they face in the public eye. Only ones that have that are the authorities.
Anons need to remind themselves, daily, that all they have is circumstantial. Nothing solid. Stop giving big names and the accused more credit than they deserve. It's a waste of time and resources.
That's not evidence.