MAXWELL EPSTEIN PEDO CABAL: WHO IS MR. AND MISS DOE?

Moar docs from court . . . Will DerSHOWitz prevail in keeping records sealed, or will the 'Doe' pseudonyms be revealed and their crimes be revealed?

HOW ARE YOU LIKING THE BERUIT AND CHYNA EXPLOSIONS AS DISTRACTION?

The pedo elites are shitting themselves to distract, delay, muh virus lockdowns, muh anything . . . Rise up and revolt against this global tyranny.

Document number 1097 filed August 4, 2020 is here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1097/giuffre-v-maxwell/

Screen cap docs 1-4 attached. Screen cap docs 5-6 to be attached in separate post.

>>10202968

MAXWELL EPSTEIN PEDO CABAL: WHO IS MR. AND MISS DOE pgs 5-6?

Document number 1097 filed August 4, 2020 is here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1097/giuffre-v-maxwell/

Screen cap docs 5-6

>>10202975

FORGOT TO ATTACH MUH DOCS

MAXWELL EPSTEIN PEDO CABAL: DOE #1 TRANSCRIPT?

The pedo cabal and its protectors are shitting themselves to stop the disclosure of more names of the criminals.

HOW MANY MORE DISTRACTIONS, EXPLOSIONS, LOCKDOWNS AND TYRANNICAL FUCKERY WILL YOU SUBMIT TOO IN ORDER TO LET THEM GO FREE?

REVOLT NOW TO THIS TYRANNY.

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge:

Pursuant to the Court of Appeals’ order (dkt. no. 1095), the

unsealing of the transcripts of Doe 1’s and Ms. Maxwell’s

depositions (and all materials quoting those transcripts or

disclosing information from those transcripts) is stayed pending

further order by the Court of Appeals.

Notwithstanding the stay, the parties shall confer and report

to the Court by letter no later than August 10, 2020, (1) their

suggestions for streamlining the unsealing process, as discussed by the Court at the July 23 hearing, and (2) their proposed next set of docket entries to be reviewed for potential unsealing.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1096/giuffre-v-maxwell/

ALL LIVES MATTER, BLM IS TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

Where are the 'prayerful, peaceful protests' at Planned Parenthood, the leading killer of Black Americans? Where are the protests of Black Americans killing Black Americans in Chicago crime murders - the highest in the nation?

RACISM IS A FRAUDULENT POLITICAL TOOL

THIS IS A GLOBALIST / CHYNA ORGANIZED ‘CULTURAL REVOLUTION’

SHILLS MUST HAVE TIMED OUT FROM DILDO RECESS

There all here . . .

DEAD COMMIES MAKE ME SMILE BIG

DerSHOWitz to Respond to Court Order Concerning 'John Doe' August 18, 2020

ORDER: Accordingly, by posting this order both in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433, and Giuffre v. Dershowitz, No. 19 Civ. 3377, the Court invites the Does to comment on the proposed disclosure. Any Doe who wishes to be heard on the disclosure proposed by counsel in Giuffre v. Dershowitz shall inform the Court of his/her views no later than August 18, 2020. Because those comments may discuss information that is currently under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, they will be submitted d irectly to the Court so that the Court can review them in camera. Comments may be sent to the Court's email address at PreskaNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov.

The Court specifically requests comment from counsel for John Doe who has appeared in Maxwell. The Court will, at the least, inform the parties generally of the nature of any comments received. Relatedly, the parties request that the Court clarify that deposition transcripts and other documents not designated confidential on their face (excerpts of some of which were submitted under seal as part of the (now unsealed) summary judgment record in Maxwell, see infra n. 1) are not subject to the Maxwell Protective Order (dkt. no. 62 in 15 Civ. 7433) and thus may be freely disclosed and produced to Defendant without any restrictions on their use or disclosure.

The Court agrees that materials not designated confidential are not covered by the Maxwell Protective Order but disagrees that there is necessarily no restriction on their disclosure. Specifically, certain materials may both (1) lack confidentiality designations made pursuant to the Protective Order and (2) be filed under seal in the Maxwell litigation. To the extent that the materials mention non-parties to the Maxwell action and remain under seal, such materials should not be disclosed before the non-parties mentioned are given notice and an opportunity to comment on the disclosure. (See supra at 2.) However, where such materials have already been unsealedeither by this Court or by the Court of Appealsthey may be freely disclosed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/4/2020) (va)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1097/giuffre-v-maxwell/

>>10203198

BIRDS OF A FEATHER . . .

Flock together

>>10203348