>>1020494 (Previous bread)
Q wasn't joking about anything, the anon that mentioned ET's was. Q was referring to the crumb that the anon posted.
Yes. A very logical, believable theory.
You could be right but I think that there really IS a video. I believe that it may be the tarmac meeting with Lynch & B. Clinton. That would be hard to fake, & all the normies would be able to accept that.
So how do you explain her Attorney going after Trump & Cohen so hard. He would have to be in on it too, & I can't wrap my brain around that.
No. Not yet.
I agree completely with that. Makes sense.
Texas too!
https ://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/backpagecom-ceo-plead-guilty-california-texas-54432778
Yeah, but that's not very smart. We'll see how it all plays out. Will be interesting to say the least.
It WILL NOT BE ANY KIND OF SEX TAPE FFS. It is simply an extremely incriminating video.
Sorry, I was responding to a conversation another anon was having. Should have been clearer. My apologies!
This has nothing to do with the video that Q is talking about. How the hell did you come to that conclusion? Q didn't post those pics.