>>10207123 (pb)
The JFK post in the middle there is Q703…
and it misspells "societies".
But given the date yesterday…I wonder if "cities" recalls Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Also, maybe worth noting that #1699 is Q+ and it was POTUS talking about the secret "middlemen" nobody knows.
Agreed, but I think the scope of "money laundering" is broader than most think.
It obviously encompasses the "laundering" of overt criminal proceeds.
But many LEGAL activities are deeply corrupt, either because the finacial moves are themselves corrupt, likes Soros making bets on currencies via inside info and destroying entire countries, or they are financial moves that are tied to knowledge of people doing overt criminal stuff (instigating disease, genocide, etc) that is liable to have huge finacnial repurcussions. Maybe these aren't so different.
I suspect most who have money "invested" in mainstream stocks are actually invested in gross criminal activity, and this knowledge needs to be hidden from them, ie laundered.
Makes sense, since I think Q has played up the idea that it won't happen until after the election. Disinfo is necessary - appear weak when you are strong.
But if you think back to 2016, the DS was obviously taken by surprise. They thought she would win. Anons got here in different way, but as for me I was a LATE Trump convert, and "knew" he would win and was ecstatic - but only a few months prior I was thinking he was a disaster who was going to screw a crucial election. LIve and learn I guess.
But now think about how the DS is thinking - they have had four years to overcome their mistakes. Does it make sense to allow them a shot?
My thinking is that Q has signalled that it won't happen until then, but it seems POTUS is now signalling that the storm is almost upon us. Why "warn" the enemy? Maybe so they panic and make mistakes. But it also helps to prep anons, since the fake news likely will try to spin it, and we must counteract them.
Cui bono?
Don't think I've seen this issue raised here:
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2020/08/06/lebanese-pundit-floats-chinese-reconstruction-beirut-port/
Various ideas have been floated about who might have intentionally sparked the Beirut blast, but none have really made sense to me. (Could be my fault, hmmmm) But if Beirut needs a new savior and China needs a "base" in the Mediterranean?
>With the big hopes that Hezbollah will respond and WWIII would start.
Wouldn't even make CNN.
Those morons have been fighting for decades.