That actually reminds me of the "Epstein killed himself" debate. It's like there's only two competing narratives anybody is discussing: that he killed himself (of his own free will to avoid jail) and that he was murdered (by the guards). But nobody asks what if NEITHER story is exactly true. What if there is a third (or fourth) possibility? By simply choosing between A and B, option C is never pursued. There are other ways of looking at Epstein's demise that don't fit neatly within EITHER of those two competing narratives. But nobody asks, and so we never really get closer to the truth. QUESTION EVERYTHING.