>>10207939 PB

>>10208059 PB

ok, again not specifically an explosives expert. just a chemist. if the report of 2700 tons of NH4NO3 is accurate, that could give a sizeable yield. the max amt of energy released would be 0.448 GJ/ton or ~ 1,234.5 GJ of energy, which is slightly more than 1/10th the yield of an equivalent mass of TNT. so that quantity of NH4NO3 would be approximately equivalent to 290 tons of TNT. but from what i am able to find in references more reliable than wikipedia, the detonation of NH4NO3 would not be efficient, and that number is a theoretical max. the actual yield would be less. still... a couple hundred tons of TNT (0.2 kilotons, or 0.0002 megatons) is a pretty big firecracker. just spitballin' i'd say it's not inconsistent with the damage. while true that there have been a number of explosions at NH4NO3 mfgr plants, they nowhere near the explosion seen in beirut. the only industrial accident in the US anywhere near that massive was in 1947 in texas.

>>10208249

that area of seabed would have been above sea level during the last period of glacial expansion. a circular plaza of stone blocks, or possibly a base of a temple or other construction, built by prehistoric peoples.

>>10208138 PB

ok, anon, just finished reading your entire thread. on the face of it, i'm open-minded enough to believe you might be the real deal.

rings true to me. so tell me, what is the reason Q says israel is left for last. pretty sure i already know.

>>10208529

ignore the nay-sayers, anon. some people here are too jaded to have an open mind. others are following your thread. keep posting.