Anonymous ID: b48a50 Aug. 6, 2020, 11:16 p.m. No.10208411   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8459

>>10208370

Yep. I've been focusing on in-person redpilling, as it will carry more weight and have a network effect when SHTF. If I can convince one person that when something happens, they can text me or call and say "holy shit, anon, you were right", then I can shepherd them through the rewrite of their understanding of the world AND then they spread that to their network. Twatter has never seemed as effective as it's essentially megaphones into the void yelling at each other, and whoever owns the void caps the effectiveness of the megaphones. Good subversion is done in person, in a non-confrontational manner, and by asking simple questions that provoke the subject to thinkโ€“ then give them space, let it settle, and watch it grow.

Anonymous ID: b48a50 Aug. 6, 2020, 11:23 p.m. No.10208476   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10208459

Yep, exactly. Should have typed "subverting the conditioning". What is it, all but ~5% will be recoverable? So, shitty math and all that, but you've got a 95% chance that that person will see the light at some point in the future.