You guys ready for the communists to have a heart attack after they thought they were able to scrub this from the internet? Well I present to you again the original ANTIFA master list that was compiled by 8ch a few years ago where the anons researching it looked at public social media sites which were connected to other public social media anti American sites and, from there, a master list (at that time) was released.

From there lawsuits began against any site who dared release the list, websites galore were taken down after they released it (for example):

https://theredelephants.com/doxxed-list-every-single-antifa-member-released-8chan/

Which was originally (comments still remain):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3579611/posts

Which also produced this lawsuit based on that list demanding it be turned over and scrubbed:

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4814989/Most-v-Reeves-Antifa.pdf

The list caused a whirlwind within ANTIFA after they were exposed. But since now the public has a greater understanding of the group, their anti American beliefs, their behavior and their treatment of people who do not align to them, might as well post it again.BAKERSo, here it is again but this time in archive form. Just watch how much this is about to be shilled.

http://archive.fo/Lvjcx

>>10209085

To preface (merely for you Baker) this data was a previous notable back a few years ago before they went into rampage mode to get it scrubbed from the internet and to get rid of 8chan. Though I believe QResearch was the main reason for them going after 8ch, part of me will always believe that the ANTIFA list was a major reason as well given that it brought together a huge amount of people who were actively checking sites for any connections. Soon after it came out articles began to flow about the journalists connected such as:

https://quillette.com/2019/05/29/its-not-your-imagination-the-journalists-writing-about-antifa-are-often-their-cheerleaders/

That writer, Eoin Lenihan, was completely ravaged for that article and then we have Ngo and we all know what happened to him because of what he exposed and the journalists protecting them. Example:

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1130971006816808961

As far as to add more information, it was a series of lists (four in total - still public but hard to find) that anons made through using social media public sites such as "Democratic Communists" or whatever where they would see the names of the people posting, then go to their page, and then from there add them based on if they showed support for ANTIFA or anti American behavior. Just to add, not a single part of those posts, not one single post ever called for any violence. It was merely a means to know who was who because ANTIFA was flooding social media with calling randoms "white supremacist" or "Nazi" or so on. Example, this ANTIFA twitter states: "We ID fascists, bigots, white supremacists, propagandists and supporters" and social media has allowed these things to happen despite the fact that it goes against their own TOS and yet at the same time they remove or go after the opposite when the clearly violent ANTIFA, BLM, or any of those connected groups "expose" someone they don't like. In this they have harmed many people and many of which were innocent and just didn't agree with them:

https://twitter.com/AntifascistF12

So the old infinitechan anons began to compile the list and it grew, and grew. To answer your final question, I would call it something along the lines of: "Previously released alleged ANTIFA supporter list". That way you make sure you add "alleged" so they can't pull any bullshit. If it's one thing they hate it is being exposed and that list caused serious issues to them, I recommend we release it again given their recent activity.

>>10209408

It is there, you have to scroll down the page for a half second.

>>10209441

It's there and archived, the anon just was lazy and didn't scroll down to see it. The first thing says not found and then the mass post begins. It's there.

Q1: Why is ANTIFA so heavily interested in and connected to the shooting in PA against cops two days ago?

Q2: Why are sites like the Heavy citing an ANTIFA account for the shooting?

Right now and the past few days on Twitter there has been a very large campaign called #NoComradesUnder1K that has generated a huge response from Communists (apparently) thinking it is some means to communicate and organize with each other. There is an endless supply of comments of them talking back and forth with each other on Twitter right now and sharing sites for their "movement". This is a great opportunity for research for those interested and identifying.

>>10209579

The ANTIFA list was removed?