doenst feel like anything near 40% tome
Q? pullback or failure?
well the part about Q playing God i can vouch for
actual facts here
For centuries the Church taught that every word of the Bible is literally and factually correct. Many still believe that today. Yet that belief does not withstand much scrutiny. Among other things the flat earth model is described in the Bible. This was considered a description of the earth. Does that withstand modern scrutiny? Most would say absoluely not.
The primary scholarly method of Bible study is EXEGESIS. This is the practice of examining the Bible together with all related disciplines - history, archeology, languages, and so on. Approached in this way one soon discovers that the Bible was written by humans - divinely inspired certainly, but written by humans.
A famour scholar (Mauro Biglino) was hired by the Vatican to translate the books of thr OT as accurately and literally as possible. When he had finished the first 3 books the Vatican panicked and cancelled the project - sealing away the new translations.
For Biglino had changed the Creation story. His translation was that "Man was created from the "material of Gods" not in "the image of God.' The implication was that man was a product of genetic design using the "material" (genes) of the "Gods". That and many other specifics led Biglino to scholar Zechariah Stichin's works.
Stitchin's translation of Sumerian tablets which pre-date the Hebrew Bible are the basis of a series of well known books starting with "The 12th Planet." When you read the accounts in the tablets it exactly matches Biglio's translations and confirm that man was "created' by the genetic engineering of an alien race known as the Annunaki, which translates as "Royal Blood",
In addition, the translations also make it clear that the many "miraculous" encounters between Hebrews and Yahweh described in the Bible are in fact real interactions with the Annunaki "lords." In particular the accounts of "chariots of the gods" and other detailed descriptions by Bible Prophets exactly match the events described in the tablets. So it tuns out that in many respects the Bible was even more literally accurate than anyone imagined.