LONDON PICS

BLACK BOX AT BUS SHELTER

Anons take a closer look, please, in SV for the changes in the S bus stop.

JUN 2012 shelter vertical poles are black but is there a black box in position? Do the pavers match at the foot of box?

MAY 2014 sidewalk has many patches around the black box area and there is no bus shelter.

JUL 2014 black bus shelter with black box but check out the patches. Q matched or no?

AUG 2014 black box and bus shelter in place, also looks like may have bus shelter number on edge of rooftop. Clear Chan label. Clear Chan van and lorry for ads.

Is there an SV image showing the crew prepping to install the shelter?

OCT 2015 black box and bus shelter in position, Clear Chan label, newish pavers looking clearner than in Q pic. Shelter number.

JUNE 2016 and onward appears the shelter had been replaced by JCDecaux setup. Also see AUG 2016, JAN 2018, APR 2019.

Does the label on the black box feature a Clear Chan logo or JCDecaus. Q match?

There are many images of this location and sometimes the traffic gets in the way but can Anons find the best Q match -

1. before JUL 2014

2. during interval of JUL 2014 to OCT 2015

3. after OCT 2015

There may be features that match better at different times. It seems these are the 3 phases of that shelter over the past several years.

Location is important. During these phases, are there changes to the occupants of various buildins in the vicinity?

TY Anons

Godspeed

>>10237565

Important to date the pic from the evidence within its frame. Q refer to time guide and to timeframe. Instructions to examine surroundings and updates. Markers.

The pavers changed during the past several years. This serves as a marker for that site. As does the style for the display of the shelter's name, Westminster Abbey. As does the shelter number and the sponsor's label - CLEAR CHANNEL or JCDecaux. Likewise the colour scheme of the structure. These changed. Even the box changed somewhat. These help to date the Q pic itself.

Yes the location is significant. Given the date at which the pic was taken, what else has significance due to that location? Tenants and owners of buildings change, for example. The individuals who might run or operate out of these nearby buildings also change over the years.

In addition, dating the pic and learning the significance of markers may help fit this piece of the puzzle into the rest of the collection of what Q has referred to as the London Pics. Thusfar, this pic has not been linked with the others based on its contents, alone. Nor based on its location, alone.

If you have the time and interest, read back in this and the past several breads for examples of how details within the pics helped to date the scenes and helped to link one pic with others - and link sets of pics with other sets. The London Pics tell a story. Some of it will depend of further guidance or reveals from q. We can work on our part, as viewers and decoders and such, toward a target or targets. Q has said that more help will be provided when targets are discovered - organically.

Myself, I have taken that instruction and promise as a prompt to thoroughly examine these particular pics so as to provide other Anons with the solid foundation to analyze and make connections that lead to the targets.

In sum, there may be an element or elements that seem the most important from a given perspective. And there may be others that are discovered by digging more deeply. Often the surface is mere cover.

The ground over in the Winter Wonderland pics, for instance, dated those as having been taken during the winter of 2013/2014 - not earlier. Details in the changes across the years revealed that those pics could not have been taken later than that same winter season. And the map of the theme park for that season correlates quite remarkably with the key markers in the vicinity of the Embankment pics - those that include Big Ben for example.

Then, still on the notion of cover, in those same Embankment pics there is a rooftop repair underway - under the cover of a shroud - which helped date these pics for the winter of 2013/2014.

Likewise, a construction shroud, very large, was unfurled over the facade of a building that appeared in another London Pic, the one with the Red Bus. That hoarding or shroud helped date that pic to between 31-OCT-2013 and 23-MAR-2014. That cover also helped date the Piccadilly pics.

One marker leads to another. These are not coincidences, in my view, because there are too many to ponder to brush off. One detail in the Piccadilly pics, for instance, pointed at the release of the LG G2 mobile phone and that ties-in on a number of levels in terms of comms. It is a thread that runs through the London Pics.

There is a reason that Q has come to this board to provide these types of drops. Future proves past is probably the way these pics will show how

-

These crumbs, in time, will equate to the biggest drops ever disclosed in our history. Remember, disinformation is real.

Q

TY Anon for asking. Hope my response provokes thought, stimulates the almonds, and encourages you to contribute or to stay tuned for more of the digging on this collection of pics. In any case, thank you for the respectful query.

Godspeed.

>>10240685

LONDON PICS

BLACK BOX, BUS SHELTER 'S'

1-JAN-2016

see press release below

pic related

https://www.jcdecaux.com/press-releases/jcdecaux-wins-transport-london-tfl-bus-shelter-advertising-contract

PARIS AUGUST 6, 2015

JCDecaux SA (Euronext Paris: DEC), the number one Outdoor advertising company worldwide and the number one in the UK, has been awarded the world’s largest bus shelter advertising concession by Transport for London (TfL) in a deal worth €700m across a period of eight years.

Following on from the recent launch of the 120m2 digital screen at London Waterloo, the iconic digital roadside location at Old Street Roundabout EC1 and the digital towers at Heathrow Airport T5, JCDecaux will continue to change the Outdoor landscape in London. The digitisation of the London bus shelters will provide a complete digital footprint in London covering all the touchpoints in the consumer journey.

JCDecaux will take over the current contract which is held by Clear Channel UK from 1 January 2016.

Leon Daniels, Managing Director of Surface Transport at TfL, said: “Our bus network carries 6.5 million people every day, and with almost 5,000 bus shelters in some fantastic locations across the Capital, this is a great opportunity for advertisers to reach our customers.”

Jean-Francois Decaux, Chairman of the Executive Board and Co-CEO of JCDecaux, said: “JCDecaux is delighted to have been awarded the prestigious TfL advertising contract, the world's largest bus shelter advertising concession. London's economy and population is booming. The city is changing at a rate not seen since Victorian times and it will have a 10 million population by 2030 increasing its value as a market for advertisers.”

“This award consolidates London’s bus shelter contracts into a single proposition of 15,000 back lit 2 sq m panels, paving the way for a significant digital transformation. JCDecaux plans to make London the global showcase for digital Out-of-Home with more than 50% of its UK advertising revenues forecast to be coming from digital by 2017.”

>>10240875

Please explain, Anon.

>>10238258

Which year in SV images is the closest match?

Or years as there may be moar than one close match.

1. pavers

2. not brand new but worn some

3. stickers/skuff mark pattern

On item 3 take very close look at the pattern. See the Q pic marked up to highlight these elements.

Now, compare with SV images across the years as per previous post. Shortly after CC installed new shelter structure, new pavers were installed. These aged, or became worn, to the extent that the Q pic is distinghished from many SV years.

There is plenty to look at but focus on comparison of, say, JAN 2018 and, say, AUG 2016 or OCT 2016.

Then ask yourself if the blue sticker would remain on the black box after JCDecaux takeover. For how long? Would a change in the shelter necessarily include a change in the interactive advert feature? When and why would the CC sticker be removed, if ever?

The notion is that the CC sticker remained for quite some time after CC lost its contract with TfL and even quite some more time after this particular shelter was alter by the new company. That may just be happenstance.

And then the addition of the Q sticker. It appears that the pattern of stickers/skuff marks shows that the Q sticker may have been the last 'layer' or very nearly the last.

Also look to the left upper corner of the Q pic. Does that look like a reflective surface? Not all part of the shelter? Something reflective in the background at the street scene? What was the tenant of the storefront behind the shelter? What was displayed and when?

Still digging.

>>10241165

Does the pictorial evidence directly point at No Name? Others have visited London at least once and some many times. Test your notion by narrowing your focus on dates, for example, and use process of elimination, perhaps.

>>10241219

Anon, it is not for me to convince you of something I have not asserted, correct? Can go by other pictorial evidence besides SV. SV is one source which has lots of images across many years for this particular site.

The stickers are evidence. When they first appear and when they first are absent in the pictorial evidence provide context. As does the date on which the TfL contract was taken over by a competitor of Clear Channel. Mitt Romney was associated with Clear Channel. That also provides context.

Here is an example relevant to the London pics. The bike hire scheme transition from the blue of Barklays to the red of Santander took about one month in Westminster and longer elsewhere. Now, there are many more bus shelters in London than there are bike hire docking stations and, prolly, bikes in that system, however, you can see that where a company's revenues are at stake there can be rather swift implementation of such changes.

Rather than leave it open-ended and shrug that it could have been a very long time, might we start with something visible on the shelter such as the change of label on the rooftop and on the top of the side panel? Would it then be reasonable to narrow the dating to such changes at that shelter? Of course, the black box is associated directly with the interactivity of the Clear Channel setup. It would also be related to the lighting of the shelter, interactivity or no. And the contact number would be relevant to either vendor, surely. We might err on the side of a switching of the sticker until we can see evidence it was not switched out after the change in vendor.

And, as it happens, you might find that evidence, or at least a hint of it, in the pics posted above where various years after 2015 were captured by SV at that shelter.

>>10241405

What date, Anon, did No Name visit London for the dossier?

The Piccadilly pics have been dated based on the content of those pics. That timeframe links the Piccadilly set with the Winter Wonderland set and with the Embankment set - again based on the content within the frames of the pics.

>>10234950

Yes you have found the area of interest. Bus shelters R and S are on the north side of Victoria Street near the junction with Great Smith Street.

The triangular area across the street and on the eastern side of that junction is known as The Sanctuary. Also of interest is Dean's Yard which, along with the Abbey and grounds, has a history of providing refuge for individuals wanted by The Law - that is, Common Law tribunes and authorities. The grassy area is known as 'GREEN'.

Reuters exclusively reveals JCDecaux eyes Clear Channel Outdoor European assets, shares move

https://www.reutersagency.com/en/reuters-best/reuters-exclusively-reveals-jcdecaux-eyes-clear-channel-outdoor-european-assets-shares-move/

DECEMBER 09, 2014

Related to changes and non-changes in bus shelters?

Why Clear Channel Outdoor Stock Tumbled Today, APR 24, 2020.

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-clear-channel-outdoor-stock-tumbled-today-2020-04-24

Outdoor Advertising market worldwide is projected to grow by US$15. 4 Billion, driven by a compounded growth of 4. 7%. Traditional, one of the segments analyzed and sized in this study, displays the potential to grow at over 5.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/02/21/1988402/0/en/Global-Outdoor-Advertising-Industry.html

IRAN

Table 172: Iranian Market for Outdoor Advertising: Annual Sales

Estimates and Projections in US$ Million by Type for the Period

2018-2025

Table 173: Outdoor Advertising Market in Iran: Historic Sales

Analysis in US$ Million by Type for the Period 2009-2017

Table 174: Iranian Outdoor Advertising Market Share Analysis by

Type: 2009 VS 2019 VS 2025

Table 175: Iranian Market for Outdoor Advertising: Annual Sales

Estimates and Projections in US$ Million by Mode/Format for the

Period 2018-2025

Table 176: Outdoor Advertising Market in Iran: Historic Sales

Analysis in US$ Million by Mode/Format for the Period 2009-2017

Table 177: Iranian Outdoor Advertising Market Share Analysis by

Mode/Format: 2009 VS 2019 VS 2025

ISRAEL

Table 178: Israeli Outdoor Advertising Market Estimates and

Forecasts in US$ Million by Type: 2018-2025

Table 179: Outdoor Advertising Market in Israel in US$ Million

by Type: A Historic Review for the Period 2009-2017

Table 180: Israeli Outdoor Advertising Market Share Breakdown

by Type: 2009 VS 2019 VS 2025

Table 181: Israeli Outdoor Advertising Market Estimates and

Forecasts in US$ Million by Mode/Format: 2018-2025

Table 182: Outdoor Advertising Market in Israel in US$ Million

by Mode/Format: A Historic Review for the Period 2009-2017

Table 183: Israeli Outdoor Advertising Market Share Breakdown

by Mode/Format: 2009 VS 2019 VS 2025

Google, Clear Channel ink long-term deal

https://www.ctvnews.ca/google-clear-channel-ink-long-term-deal-1.237494

Google Inc. and Clear Channel Communications Inc. announced a long-term agreement Sunday that will allow the Internet search leader to place advertising for its online customers on more than 675 Clear Channel radio stations.

>>10241261

SV APR 2019

>>10242314

SV JUL 2019

A terrific find. Definitely high value find. The location is now well documented and being scrutinized.

The black box pic was posted in Q 1725 on 7 JUL 2018.

That post included or referenced several Q posts all from the same day. See the 'nested' or 'daisychained' set of posts.

Q 1720

Q 1721

Q 1722

Q 1723

Q 1724

Q 1725

PLUS Q 1726, Q 1727, and the Q 1728 related posts - Q 1729 to Q 1734. ALL on same day within about 2 hours during midday.

Evidently Q linked the black box pic with other London, or London-related, pics in the collection. But can we link the black box with other London pics through the content of that particular pic?

At the moment it seems a stretch. So can we use the nested posts to link that black box pic to the other London Pics? It may serve as a pivot in time.

The Embankment pic in Q 1720 was taken during the winter of 2013/2014. it was posted twice as an embed in reference to Lisa Page, apparently placing her in LONDON 2013/2014. Seemingly with PS altho Anons may think the man is someone else such as her husband. But the implication is clearly there that that was PS - re Q 1723 'PS round 2. [Lead investigator HRC/Russia].'

The black box was posted in Q 1724 with three nested Q posts.

Q 1723 which read as

PS round 2.

[Lead investigator HRC/Russia].

And Q 1724 which read as

Warning to UK?

Decipher re: last.

[Redacted FISA].

And Q 785 which read

WARNING_UK_

_LONDON_POSSIBLE_CAR_ATTACK_24

STRIKE_PACKAGE_B-7V

WARNING_UK_IMM_CHATTER_

XRAY_7

CHATTER^^^^^^^^

Q, DELTA

PLUS Q 757 which took a similar form and read

WARNING_EU_

_EU_POSSIBLE_CAR_ATTACK_72

STRIKE_PACKAGE_B-7V

WARNING_UK_IMM_CHATTER_

XRAY_7

Q, DELTA

AND just prior there was Q 750 which now seems to be a foretelling of a recent statement by POTUS who referred to Big Pharma and how rich some of those people are who oppose him. Q 750 read

Our attack on big pharma came w/ a warning letter today.

Message received.

Response forthcoming

Q

>>10242314

Compare the SV JUL 2019 with the following. SV JAN 2018 and APR 2018.

Q posted black box pic on 7 JUL 2018. To state the obvious, that was after SV JAN 2018 and after APR 2018. Now maybe I am not seeing clearly but it seems to me that the SV images show a white patch where there was a blue sticker for Clear Channel. But the pattern of stickers and skuffs in SV JAN 2018 is a fairly close match for the black box pic - except for the color of the sticker or patch where there was a blue Clear Channel sticker. So if I have this correctly, then, the white patch is the mostly removed blue sticker of the black box pic. Which would make sense as the competition would have taken over that bus shelter by then.

But my eyes may be missing something that other Anons may have spotted.

This is to say that tentatively it looks to me like Q's pic predates these SV images of 2018. Even though Q posted it in JUL 2018.

>>10243587

For completeness, I will add that to my eye SV APR 2018 includes what looks like a darker blue than the Clear Channel blue - closer to the color used by JCDecaux. So it could be a JCDecaix sticker over the Clear Channel sticker. The box looks like it had been given a bit of a clean-up, too, compare with the SV JAN 2018 image.

https://twitter.com/JCDecaux_France

https://www.brandsoftheworld.com/logo/jcdecaux

>>10243702

TY fren.

Always done in a positive spirit.

Much appreciated.

>>10243587, >>10241261

BLACK BOX PIC

SV MAR 2017

This one is a fairly close match as it seems to have the Clear Channel sticker, but it is missing two items. The Q sticker and the sticker that is partially under the Q sticker - item 4 in the mark-up I did earlier.

And the skuff mark lower on the box - item 6 - may be missing in SV MAR 2017. Or it may be there behind the slight glare. The rest looks pretty close to a Q match.

>>10243768

Nicely done, Anon.

>>10244414

TY Anon, the 2nd image is APR 2019 and not 2019. That one looks like there is a JCDecaux label.in place of the light blue CC label.

Correction applies to to >>10243587, >>10243701

>>10244252

Not as yet if you mean an example of JCD on label at a bus shelter or otherwise. BUT the darker colour scheme is displayed at the twat link, for example.

>https://twitter.com/JCDecaux_France

>https://www.brandsoftheworld.com/logo/jcdecaux

Also in press releases like the one posted earlier re takeover of the shelters.

>>10244471

SV MAR 2017 def pre-Q sticker.

SV JAN 2018 pre-Q sticker

SV APR 2019 all stickers removed except company sticker?

Yeh, think that is what my eyes are seeing.

You too, Anon?

SV shows the box and labels to be a close Q match in OCT 2015 when the CC label was still on the rooftop and side panel. In this one there is no Q sticker but also missing is the sticker beneath, See item 4 in prev mark-up of Q black box pic.

So far the earliest SV image that shows the changeover to JCD on the rooftop and side panel is JUN 2016, according to my own dig. But always need verification if Anons can take the closer looksee to find an earlier or better image that shows the changeover?

GCHQ PALMER STREET

BLACK BOX PIC VICTORIA STREET

Was this the actual location of GCHQ?

GCHQ 'origins'

https://www.gchq.gov.uk/section/history/our-origins-and-wwi

>>10247897

It sure does look like the same light blue sticker with much 'erosion'. Yeap. That SV 2P 2019 can be compared with JUL 2019. Differences? APR 2019?

>>10247897, >>10248050

Q pic v SV SEP 2019

This one I think may have been taken after Q label was removed. See lack of the lower skuff mark.

Compare with the following.

Before skuff mark

SV AUG 2016

SV MAR 2017

Next post will show skuff mark in SV.

>>10247897, >>10248050, >>10248147

Q black box pic v SV JAN 2018 with skuff mark.

No skuff mark, pre SV JAN 2018

AUG 2016

MAR 2017

No skuff mark, after SV JAN 2018

APR 2019

JUL 2019

SEP 2019

What might that evidence indicate?

Perhaps that Q black box pic was taken after SV JAN 2018 was captured and before SV APR 2019 was captured - before removal of stickers except for the CC sticker?

Revisit 'Compare against 2.16.18'?

…..

Oddly, SV JUL 2019 appears to be moar clean than SV SEP 2019 as far as residual gum left behind where stickers had been. Might SV SEP 2019 been taken before APR 2019 but posted later.

SV SEP 2019 has a name on it and does not appear to be part of the usual SV images found on the basic map.

>>10248278

Does SV JAN 2018 show the Q sticker?

Maybe the Anon who enhanced the Q black box pic could enhance this image also for comparison?

>>10248278

Images dated after SV JAN 2018.

APR 2019

JUL 2019

SEP 2019

>>10248337

Q black box pic.

Compare Q pic with the following, pre JAN 2018.

SV JUL 2015

SV OCT 2015

Differences?

Does SV JUL 2015 show a sticker, white, that was removed and left gum behind that is seen in SV OCT 2014?

IDK. Leaning toward, yeap, that sticker was there in JUL and not in OCT.

Also note that in Q's black box pic there is a sticker behind the Q sticker. It peaks out from under the larger sticker. In later SV images, the gum residue can be seen in that spot.

Hightlighted with yellow in attached pic.

>>10248537

SV MAY 2015

Just two stickers.

v SV JUL 2015, 3 stickers.

The 3rd is the one on an angle below the others.

>>10249283

XLNT IDEA Anon.

Sequencing.

There may be enough images above to get a gud start on filling in that list. Got bunch of vids running on one monitor as I type. So may have moar to help with that. Back in a bit.

>>10249476

Please remember to post mini-bun on those digz, Anon. Grist for the mill.

>>10249283

This table is not exactly a sequencing of the appearance and absence of each sticker, but it can be modified to add that. Note that I posted an image that numbered the stickers but that was based on layering, or the sequence in which the stickers seemed, to me, to have been affixed to the box. But here it is put aside. Chronological sequencing is prolly moar useful anyway. That can be added to the table if Anons have already made progress on the sequencing.

For now here is a general table of markers such as stickers, gum residue, skuffs, and vendor identification. The source for each image is listed - so far just one from a vid - and at the top are the criteria for a Q match based only on the box itself rather than pavers and the like.The table can be updated for other markers.

The column on the left, 'COMMENTS', is where ambiguities are parked for now. Example, the large sticker that appeared early but which became partially torn and then partially covered by the QANON sticker is noted when its torn appearance is clear. Another example, sometimes we don't get a full view of the box and that is noted. And third example, at times it is hard to figure if there is gum residue or not in the particular spot where a sticker had previously appeared and so that gets an 'I DON'T KNOW' or IDK.

Will work on the vendor labels next. These are best seen on the other side of the shelter at the roof corner and at the top of the side panel.

Are there other features that Anons would like to include? Changes?

LONDON PICS

BLACK BOX

DEC 2018

https://youtu.be/zaixRredTbY

>>10248972

YEAP, helpful. Will prepare a vid to illustrate the 'evolution' of the sticker/ residue pattern on the side of the black box. Pics already posted in this bread. An infographic would be too large, for now, but will prep a low-res version, if Anons interested. The posted table makes moar sense with images, natch, but for now here is a text version.

Hope this will suffice for some Anons active on digging these various stickers. Description is based on SV images except where noted otherwise. An enhanced - for demarking stickers - version of high-res pic is attached as reference.

2008 JUN - no black box, but patches on ground hint of previous units. Shelter ID number visible on roof edge at top left. 0133 0148. Red label on top right, London Transit. No vender/sponsor label.

2009 AUG - roof profile changed. Shelter ID same number in same roof edge location. CC label on top of side panel. Neighbouring shelter 'R' had same in 2008. Comparison of the two shelters in later years may be useful in further dating Q image.

2012 JUN - yellow Silverdale coach stopped in the way so minimal view of shelter. Black box in place. One sticker on it. No clearly visible CC label on shelter.

2012 AUG - CC label on black box prior to the upgrade for the shelter structure. Box looks cleaned up down to the base. No hint of previously removed stickers.

2014 MAY - Shelter removed. Patched pavement. Black box in place. One patch, CC blue. Label side panel looks clean to ground, no hint of gum residue. Narrow front panel mud or splash splattered.

2014 JUL - Shelter in place. Looks pretty much same as 2012 AUG, curiously.

2014 AUG - Installation of new shelter. The CC vans - there were two - and the ADSHEL lorry are in the way so we do not have a clear view of the box nor of the pavement in that area. Shelter ID 0133 0148. CC label top right front edge of roof.

To be continued…

REQUEST for Anons.

What is the language, or script, used in the bottom label on the Q pic of black box? See previous post of high res, enhanced. See attached pic of that label, enhanced.

Gang marking? Arabic? Persian? …?

BLACK BOX PIC

DEC 2018

Spitballing.

JOINT TREASION was a topic of Q 1455. It leaps out of the context of the black box dig - its DATE and its surroundings.

What is JOINT TREASON?

Kerry and Ismaily in London 2011-2012.

Enrichment has multiple meanings.

SEP-NOV 2013 talks and the Joint Plan of Action between Iran and P5+1.

FRAMEWORK.

OCT 2015 deal made. Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

Premised on changes to enrichment.

EURO UNION undid sanctions based on those changes.

JAN 2016 International Atomic Energy Agency report on enrichment.

JAN 2016 1.7 BILLIONS.

Moar - 150 BILLIONS.

NSA v C_A/SIS

Late 2013.

99,999,999.99 x 13 = 1299999999.87

Plus 10 millions.

Via the Judgement Fund.

Unlawful means for treasonous ends.

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

PRISM and @SNOWDEN.

C_A.

London Eye.

Big wheels and round-a-bouts.

Traffic and Comms.

Q 2938

Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).

How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?

Multiple meanings.

Enrichment.

Bridge.

Joint.

Wheel and Deal.

OK, back to the pictorial evidence and facts, facts, facts for solid foundation.

>>10257019

Does it appear someplace else? Not in tin eye, based on the tiny bit of the larger box pic. Had not noticed it during search for the box and transit shelter. Prolly a needle in the haystack.

But did notice some graffit on the wall behind the bus shelter. Will have to review SV images for that…

>>10261151

How do you repair a bridge without shutting it down?

Q

NIOC House silently and facelessly stood behind Bus Shelter 'S' on Victoria Street. The building is bound in the west and north by Dean Farrar Street, Tothill Street, and ……

See pic >>10243768

… also bound in the east by a knot of streets, Tothill/ Storeys Gate/ The Sanctuary.

East of the junction with Great Smith Street, Victoria becomes The Sanctuary - which intersects with the knot of streets and park settings at Storeys Gate. The Sanctuary is a bit like a roundabout but not in shape for it is triangular.

See pic attached.

The Sanctuary is not just a street but a precinct. The area extends from the knot of streets southward across a pedestrian space and through an archway to 'GREEN', a park like setting adjacent to other old buildings used in part by a school. There is a monument at

the pedestrian space. It stands in the shadow of The Abbey. The archway was built-over long ago with houses that are now property of the UK Gov. In those offices is that of the Attorney General/ Solictor General. Also other tenants.

Eastward, The Sanctuary becomes Borad Sanctuary, reaches Parliament Square and then, turns onto Great George Street which transitions to BRIDGE STREET east of Parliament Street. This is the route to VICTORIA EMBANKMENT and the crossing of the River Thames via WESTMINSTER BRIDGE.

That description, rough and as convoluted as it may seem, is best comprehended via a good map.

Alternatives to Googlemaps include the following used here with searches for the streets and sites mentioned.

https://www.myshiptracking.com/

https://newwestcity.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1

But why make an effort to comprehend the streets and routes?

Q 1455

Find the markers [street/surroundings updates]

Q 538

KNOW your surroundings.

Q 3568

Be vigilant.

See something.

Say something.

Know your surroundings at all times

Q 2776

Barr to Mueller:

“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”

Q 1455

UK/SIS

WH/C_A/FBI/DOJ

Joint-Treason.

You have a choice.

SIS 'good' agents.

The time is now.

Contact window(s) [GOOD]

Biblical.

The history of this bit of terrain, hinted at by its name, THE SANCTUARY, is entangled with the history of THE LAW, treason, 'serious' crimes - which is a category and is incorporated into gov offices over the archway noted earlier - and THE ABBEY its neighbouring grounds.

Q 1445 hints of comms to players that there was a sort of 'sanctuary' on offer at that time or in the timeframe relevant to the topic of Q's London pics.

The image of the roadworks lit sign that advised drivers to avoid BRIDGE STREET was posted MAR 2015. The stretch of VICTORIA EMBANKMENT underwent major works that changed the lanes to accomodate new cycle only lanes. This extened to Westminster Bridge at BRIDGE STREET.

TfL docs show that not all traffic was diverted. Buses and taxi-cabs used the Bridge throughout the major roadworks.

Q 2938

Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS?

Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals?

Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).

How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?

Q

Now, Anons, this may not be a correct decode of the London Pics, perhaps not even close. But it is submitted for your consideration. Make of it what you may.

Few moar pics to follow.

WWG1WGA

>>10267667

LONDON PICS

BLACK BOX, EMBANKMENT, others

MAP overview of the sites covered in London Pics.

MAP overview of the bus shelter 's' and surroundings, including THE SANCTUARY and the route toward BIDGE STREET.

Will summarize the relevant history of The Sanctuary and provide sauces, in a bit. Heavy attention to finishing carpentry on vid series. Some revamping based on dating contents of black box.

>>10264373

>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_graffiti

TY Anon, v much.

The tag we are discussing showed up in SV 2015 JUL and appeared in 2015 OCT, 2016 JUN, 2016 AUG, 2016 OCT, 2017 MAR, 2018 JAN, but not in 2018 DEC.

The pic for 2018 DEC is a screencap from a vid where the camera was perched at the front window of a double-decker bus. (Makes me think that the RED BUS pic and its reflections point to this means of learning moar about the surroundings.) It shows a cleaned-up box with just the official Shelter ID sticker.

Q's pic shows the gum residue left over from the removed stickers but also shows the tag that is affixed beneath #QANON. This is fairly matched with SV 2018 JAN which also shows the scuff mark below all the stickers. Now, that mark may also be gum residue, IDK, but got no image that shows a sticker there.

The next SV images show neither the scuff mark nor the stickers. 2019 APR shows the shelter sticker and also the gum residue where the other stickers had been. No scuff mark is discernible. 2019 JUL looks the same to my eye. 2019 SEP shows the same but moar clearly so. The scuff mark did not make a re-appearance so it seems to me that the stickers were removed, the box wiped down fairly lightly such that the residue remained, mostly, and other less delible marks removed.

Alternatively, a thorough cleaning was applied prior to the 2018 vid but moar stickers were affixed and removed later, leaving the residue.

If stickers go on and are scraped off, a few times, I suppose it may be a telltale sign of ˮother great writers tend to slash out self-proclaimed kings who have not gained that rank yet in their eyesˮ as per the write-up in wikipedia. Pic related.

>>10268062

It may be that the Q black box pic was taken between the SV 2018 JAN and the Vid 2018 DEC. While JAN is the closest Q match, with both the tag and the scuff mark below, it is ambiguous enough that it could pre-date or post-date the Q pic which has an additional sticker beneath #QANON.

Have you enough to assess or shall I post moar of the SV images? Might a side-by-side type infographic be of use at this time or can you see these changes in what is already online and available?

>>10267666

Concur, if not THE key, surely one of the most significant keys to the whole shebang.

>>10267666

Just occurred to me that there may be such a thing as a skeleton key held or personified by 'who knows where the bodies are buried'. Which brings to mind -

Q 953 - in part

Removal is the least of their problems.

Projection.

Russia>D/HRC

Twitter Bots>GOOG operated (not Russia)/Narrative & Political SLANT

BIDEN / CHINA.

BIG DEVELOPMENT.

TRAITORS EVERYWHERE.

AMERICA FOR SALE.

FLYNN.

Targeted.

Why?

Who knows where the bodies are buried?

CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES.

TRUMP ADMIN v2?

Election theft.

Last hope.

THERE WILL COME A TIME NONE OF THEM WILL BE ABLE TO WALK DOWN THE STREET.

BIGGEST FEAR.

PUBLIC AWAKENING.

Q

>>10268656

This makes for terrific background and context for the image that Q dropped. The tag remained about 3 years and #QANON was not placed over it. Instead #QANON was placed over some other sticker of which only a bit remained visible - it had been scratched, apparently. There is no sign of that underneat-tag in the SV images, whatsoever.

Significance of leaving the slap tag alone but covering another sticker with #QANON? It could have been placed over another vaccant or previously scratched spot on the box. Yet #QANON was placed over another sticker without maligning the CC sticker nor the slap tag. Might it have signified a counter-move? Comms. Or just a coincidence.

Here is another examination of the black box in Q pic. Compare with original or with the high res version.

The first sticker is CC and it was visible 2012 APR remained 2014 MAY when shelter structure replaced, and 2014 AUG when shelter was further modified, and still visible 2015 MAY.

Still bright white in 2015 JUL when the slap tag first appeared in SV images. By 2015 OCT it began to look less bright, prolly torn or weather worn, or scratched. Looked more worn out by 2016 JUN but image is blurry. In SV 2016 AUG it pretty much has taken the shape we see later - 2016 OCT, 2017 MAR, 2018 JAN.

So might the slap tag - the one on an angle (and would appear below the height of #QANON in Q pic) - have been a replacement or a counter to the one that appeared right below CC? It was damaged prior to the slap tag appearance. On the other hand, it looked close to the shape and size of CC and might have been an official sticker. Maybe it was not as durable in weather, alone.

SEQUENCE - 1. CC, 2. sticker immediately below CC, 3. slap tag on angle, 4. scuff mark or sticker residue, 5. sticker that is later covered by #QANON. 6. #QANON.

Into the mix is what appears to be another large sticker where the scuff mark appeared. Scuff cold be gum residue from it. Looking closely can discern at least two fairly straight edges which suggests a sticker had cover the spot before mud or rain splattered over box. If this was a sticker, it appeared before the scuff and was gone before the scuff in 2018 JAN. That the scuff/residue was removed better than the other areas suggests it was gone shortly after it had been stuck on.

And that might suggest, given its shape and size, that a #QANON had been in that spot, was removed, then another sticker went on and #QANON covered it up as per the Q pic.

Anons feel free to poke holes in the above description and sequence.

>>10269235

LONDON PICS, SEQUENCE

TEXT EDIT previous post.

>Still bright white in 2015 JUL when the slap tag first appeared in SV images. By 2015 OCT it began to look less bright, prolly torn or weather worn, or scratched. Looked more worn out by 2016 JUN but image is blurry. In SV 2016 AUG it pretty much has taken the shape we see later - 2016 OCT, 2017 MAR, 2018 JAN.

Precede above with -

The second sticker - immediately below the CC sticker - first appeared in 2015 MAY. Still bright white in 2015 JUL …

IMAGE EDIT

The sequence appears to run clockwise. Each sticker is numbered in pic.

Also note that the bolts at the foot of the black box appear to have been sheared or cut off. Unless, that is, these were just studs in the first place. Heads on the top of the box appear intact.

>>10268365

If there is significance in the location of the bus shelter 'S' near the ABBEY precinct or neighbourhood, it might be that it is just down the street from THE REFUGE. Which puts Q 953 in a slightly different light than the one perhaps most commonly considered apt.

THERE WILL COME A TIME NONE OF THEM WILL BE ABLE TO WALK DOWN THE STREET.

Walk toward the sanctuary before the time is up and the windows are closed on the offer to come in from the dark side and co-operate as witness. There are ticket kiosks and the like in the London Pic scenes. Doubt there are scalpers for what Q offered.

Those who took refuge, at the historical location near the bus shelter re the Abbey neighbourhood, were pretty much confined there, guarded even, especially if the crime was treason and such. There might be other places of refuge or escape from which those who got the offer would not be able to leave when the windows closed. So pick a side and walk the street no moar. Makes private hire come to mind.

>>10269574

BRILLIANT reminder, Anon. Q clearance re highest level of security clearance, US DEP ENERGY.

>>10268062, >>10269574

So slapper tag, item 3, was om SV for 2yr 3m. And appeared in the Q pic. But was gone with the rest by the time of the vid of DEC 2018.

Item 4, the 'ghosted' sticker/scuff showed up in JAN 2019. What if the splatter was on there and when someone placed #QANON on the box in this spot where, in Q pic, there appears to be a scuff mark, possibly some residue, and the splatter?

Then, a short time after*, it was lifted and moved to the spot we see in Q pic. On close examination, there are those straight edges seen around the scuff mark, item 4. On one side of those edges less dust or splatter than on the other side. Suggests the dirt was lifted by the sticker's sticky side, yes?

If so, then, what happened during the interval? Maybe item 5 was stuck on the box later by someone else? (Or by Q. It might indicate a time by which a certain action or comm was deadlined, for example. An offer was time-limited. Call it 9 o'clock - not literally but figuratively due to the position clockwise.) Next, #QANON is lifted and moved to cover item 5. (Maybe Q closed the window or comms when the deadline was reached by moving #QANON. Or answered a message that way - confirmation or over-ride.)

Anyway, that is the sequence I discern from the Q pic. And, sure, it could be as simple as Q noticing that someone innocently stuck a label on the box and when it came time to take the pic, or to grab the pic from some other sauce, it was not good to capture the contact info in a Q pic and so #QANON was moved. Same sequence, different details. Does this ring true or no. Maybe isolate the evidence for the sequence and put aside the whys and such for a subsequent analysis.

• A 'short time after' because the residue seemed to have cleaned off better than the other areas of residue - see vid 2018 DEC and compare with 2019 SEP, pic attached. Of course, if the sticker was applied over dirt, it would not adhere so well to the metal of the box itself. This might explain how some of the dust was apparently lifted - it stuck to the backside of #QANON. And why maybe that scuff mark was a combo with residue.

>>10256654

LONDON PICS,

Black box pic,

evolution of stickers continued.

2015 MAY - CC sticker remained. Second sticker appeared (ITEM 2). About same size and shape as CC and positoned immediately below. Seems bright white but difficult to figure what is printed on it. Hard CC label on right side of rooftop front edge, Shelter ID number on left side. Pavement patches replaced with new pavers across the sidewalk. HSBC signage and window treatments are gone.

2015 JUL - Hard labels remain on rooftop front edge. CC and item 2 remain. Another sticker appeared, slapper tag (ITEM 3), affixed on a moar severe angle than the previous stickers. The foot of the box is dirty with what appears to be rain splatter but upward the rest of box seemed clean around the stickers.

2015 OCT - Hard labels remain on rooftop front edge. Previous 3 stickers in place. Foot of box seemed cleaner that in SV 2015 JUL.

2016 JUN - Hard CC label gone. JCD appeared on side panel, top, over ad space. The 3 stickers remain, blurry view of them, looked intact.

2016 AUG - 3 stickers remain, but item 2 looked shabby, torn, partially just gum residue, resembles same in Q pic.

2016 OCT - seemed just like SV 2016 AUG.

2017 MAR - Hard JCD label remained on side panel. Shelter ID on left side of roof edge. Three stickers as previous, but seen through red bus window, glare slightly obscures area of box below 3 stickers. No scuff or sticker apparent down there. View partially obscured by white Air Bus Express - Stansted Airport.

2018 APR - View largely obscured by lorry. View of blackbox showed CC label only.

2018 JAN - Hard labels as before. Three stickers as before, but item 3 looks a bit moar worn. First appearnce of scuff mark, ITEM 4.

2018 DEC - VID screencap. Captured through front window on 2nd deck on double-decker bus, some slight glare. CC sticker only. Some gum residue discerned immediately under CC, but no scuff mark. Lower half of box looked cleaner than in previous. Bus shelter ID label on left side of rootop edge. No view of side panel for hard JCD label.

2019 APR - Hard JCD label on side panel as previously. Only the CC sticker on side of black box. Gum residue present in general area of previous stickers as per SV and in Q pic . But no scuff mark.

2019 APRI - Hard labels as prevous. CC and residue very like previous. Sunlight made for glare on camera.

2019 SEP - Hard labels as before. Black box as before. Better view of the residue. CC sticker seemed moar beat up, worn, partially torn along bottom edge. Foot of box clearner than in SV 2018 JAN and in Q pic.

That's the list of images so far collected for this bus shelter, scene of Q black box pic. Notes not as complete as would prefer but hands and eyes are busy with other matters.

Anons, Victoria Street is well-visited on foot and on tour bus and is well-trod by coaches and transit buses. Prolly some images available to fill-in the gaps around 2018 JAN, before and after, during.

Blessings.

>>10270152

Naturally, fren. Objection sustained.

However, look closely at the Q pic. Look for the 'ghost' label demarcated by straight edges that bound an area where dust and dirt had been lifted. The area is about the shape and size of #QANON. And there is no image captured thusfar of the sticker that lies beneath #QANON.

There is in evidence an interval between the images that show items 1, 2, 3 and images that show 4. A second interval is in evidence between images that show item 4 and item 5. And in evidence is the removal of the scuff mark/ residue and straight edges while the other residue and the CC sticker remained. The latter suggests, and does not with certainty indicate, that the scuff mark, from which some dirt had been lifted, was cleaned better than the other gummed areas.

Was that scuff mark area only dirt and no gum? Possibly. Yet there are those straight edges and the apparent lifting of dirt along those edges. Suggests, and does not with certainty indicate, that a sticker had lifted some of the dirt and possibly some gum was left behind. Such a combo would clean moar easily than gum adhered directly to a cleaned metal surface.

No direct evidence of a label having been in that position on that black box. No direct evidence of a moved #QANON sticker. Yet there is evidence to support both notions. That is to say, these notions are not without merit drawn from the evidence at hand.

TY Anon. We must adhere to the facts as per the pictorial evidence. And do so at least as well as that gum residue stuck to the black box. Kek.

Cheers.

>>10270152

For emhasis and to prevent obscuring the pont - It can be reasonably deduced from the available evidence that #QANON was placed after the sticker beneath it, item 5. The sequence remains as described as per the pictorial evidence.

1. CC

2. Sticker immediately below CC.

3. Slapper tag, sticker on a moar pronounced angle beneath the first two.

4. Scuff mark/ residue below the first three items.

5. Sticker partially covered by #QANON in Q pic.

6. #QANON.

What ought not go unattended is the pictorial evidence of at least two straight edges - on one side of which the dirt is lighter than on the other side. That does not happen with random splashes or splatter. It is evidence of clear demarcation of a shape and size very like that of #QANON. There is no direct evidence of any other such sticker of that shape and size.

Based on the Q pic, it can be reasoned that there was an interval between #QANON and that sticker that lies underneath it. One lies on top of the other. The duration of this interval is open pending further evidence. It could be hours or months.

Still, the described sequence is sound. What may have occured during that interval is unknown except by way of deduction from what is in evidence within the frames of these images. Nothing moar than that has been asserted.

The top left edge of the underneath-sticker, item 5, is discernible. it appears at about the same height of the back of the rabbit in #QANON. (Note that in previous markup of the Q pic the outline of that sticker was a bit too tall.) So it prolly was not entirely scratched but was mostly covered. Its bottom edge peaks out and it does look to have been scratched rather than weathered. IF so, then, the interval would have been rather short.

Likewise, given that the scuff mark/ residue was removed while the other gummed areas remained suggests, but does not with certainty indicate, that the sticker evidenced by the straight edges had been lifted rather shortly after it had been stuck in that position. As it happens to be the shape and size of another sticker that appeared around the same time as the scuff mark, it is reasonable to deduce that this sticker was lifted and moved to a new position.

Admittedly, it might also have been discarded. But that would not rule out a second copy of the same sticker, same shape and size, being stuck in the positon of #QANON in the Q pic. Either way would account for the 'ghost sticker' that is in evidence on the black box.

>>10270742

˃And there is no image captured thusfar of the sticker that lies beneath #QANON.

To clarify, there is no such image, thusfar, of that sticker before #QANON. While we cannot describe in it full and cannot describe its condition before having been partially scratched and partially covered, we can fairly deduce the sequence nontheless. The one beneath was stuck in its position before the one on top of it was stuck in its position as per the Q pic.

Will add that the 'ghost sticker' was in that ghost position before most of the splatter as that splatter shows a formation that carries across the straight edges in the pictorial evidence. If it had been there before the splatter, there would be a notable difference in its form. This also goes toward deducing that the #QANON sticker, if it had been at that position, was vulnerable to be splattered likewise. Less so in its higher position in the Q pic. IF it had been moved, it coud have been for multiple reasons such as due to a second thought about it being splattered esp if it was a wintery or rainy scenario. And such as covering a sticker that Q did not wish to divulge - for various reasons including those theorized by Anon previously and including the comms suggested by myself earlier.

>>10269820

TY Anon, that helps keep track of things.

>>10269968

>Item 4, the 'ghosted' sticker/scuff showed up in JAN 2019.

Correction, showed up in JAN 2018.

Not 2019.

2018.

>>10276343

HULLO Anon. Welcome to the dig. The WW season of the Q WW pics was 2013/2014. But if you have moar seasons, all the better. The 2015/2016 season was a starting point given the Q post that identified that winter as a time guide. And now with the black box pic it looks like 2018 is another season to possibly dig into.

Locations within the theme park in 2013/2014 that are of interest include the Power Plaza around which were situated the Wilde Mouse Coaster, the Double Decker Carousel, the Great Bavarian Hall, Avalanche, Apres Ski Bar, and Power Tower.

Items that help date the pics include the ground cover, the Wilde Mouse sign, the two wooden Towers at the plaza near the sign/guide post that resembles a tree, the cotton candy kiosk, and good views of the lights that adorned the Wilde Mouse on the initial way up and also at the top centre. Kek. Any other interesting bits would be lovely to check out.

For other seasons, suppose that the same features would be of interest if only for comparison with 2013/2014. Views from top of the Power Plaza, Gladiator, Wilde Mause would be kewl. Or the zip line of 2012/2013. Or other views from high. A view that I searched for was of the plaza or of Wilde Maus/carousel from the entrance way of the Bavarian Hall. Or from between those two wooden towers nearby. That was the approximate vantage point from which Q's pics were taken in 2013/2014.

Thanks Anon.

Happy hunting.

LONDON PICS

Black box

VID screencap, from north side pavement, looking toward the street, 23 AUG 2015. Gud view of the 3 labels and condition of the black box.

>>10277814

Protests or demonstrations?

LONDON PICS

Black Box, VID NOV 2019 screencap

>>10278687

Tippy-top, Anon. Gud thot. Worth a dig.

>>10278269

LONDON PICS

BLACK BOX CLOSEUP, View from Bus 211, NOV 2019

While the scuff mark on the lower part of the box had been cleaned up, the upper part where the groups of stickers had been clustered showed that stubborn gum residue. Resembles DEC 2018 in that regard. Also, CC was the only sticker that remained.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJSfJXNHnqw

>>10278687

The Q red bus has been hard to identify and to locate but its bare side panels and its middle window are close matches with the bus in the attached pic which is a private hire that has appeared for years in the general area of the London Pics. This composite image is gud for comparisons although the vid from which the screencaps were pulled was taken way out of relevant timeframe.

>>10226383

TY BAKER.

Anons, as previously noted when call went out for dig on the black box pic, other London Pics have connects with each other. Only this particular pic seems to be a standalone. The challenge is to find the pictorial evidence that connects black box with at least one other pic or one other set of pics.

The bus shelter in the Red Bus pic may be a connection, thematically, but is there also a tag of some kind to be found at that or the scene of any of the other London Pics? We would be looking for what amounts to a bridge of some kind.

Previously a connection was made, obliquely, between Victoria Street and the route of buses that head to Bridge Street, or the common route drivers take to Embankment/Westminster Bridge. That was done via an SV image with a roadworks night sign advising to avoid Bridge Street. The sign appeared near the NIOC House and the image dated for 2015 around the time that major work was done on the lanes of Embankiment, including in front of Big Ben. So those would qualify as connections, of a tenuous sort, based on features in Embankment pics.

The interactive advert boards on the bus shelter 'S' might, possibly, maybe, kinda, link to the LG G2 clue in the Piccadilly pics. The London Eye just happens to be looming down the street, too.

Anyway, IDK. Anons, do you see the need to discover a bridge or connection? Do the above possibilities suffice? Or is there something unique about this blck box pic that points to it being the missing link? Are there letter or number clues that combine to provide the basis for a future proves past? On that last one, only time will tell, by the very nature of the question.

Godspeed Anons All.

LONDON PICS

Black Box pic

Change of time range within which Q pic taken.

Bookend, 'before' date, 27 AUG 2018

VID Screencap posted on that date.

View from top deck of red Double-decker Bus.

Different cluster of sticker/gum residue.

Appears that the scuff mark and splatter pattern was gone by this date. Also that at least one other sticker position had been filled - only some residue remains.

>>10291634

This is a clip from a video shot from top deck at front window of double-decker bus on Route 11, London, UK. AUG 2018.

ROUTE 11 incudes Victoria Street, Bridge Street, Whitehall, Equestrian Statue of Charles I on roundabout at Trafalgar Square, Northumberland, Charing Cross on Strand, and onward.

https://youtu.be/V7-WfT5lbF0

Bus shelter 'S' is a Coach Stop, not a TfL stop even though it is on a few TfL Routes. An example of a coach route is National Express 075 from Victoria Coach Station, southwest of stop 'S', to Stansted Airport, and onward to Cambridge. Route goes along Victoria Embankment and under the Hungeford Bridge and onward to the northeast.

https://timetables.nationalexpress.com/routes/NX/075/London-Cambridge/O

>>10294492

Coach Route 075 relevant to WMB scenes of Q London PICS via location of the Black Box pic of Bus Shelter 'S'. Note thnat this route goes to Stansted Airport - hence the north side of Victoria Street in the Q pic - and travels toward the junctions of Bridge Street/EMB and Northumberland/EMB. Also note that on his visit to London, POTUS arrived at and departed from Stansted Airport.

Q 128 in part

What is a map?

Why is a map useful?

What is a legend?

Why is a legend useful?

What is a sequence?

Why is this relevant?

When does a map become a guide?

What is a keystone?

Everything stated is relevant.

Everything.

Future provides past.

Map provides picture.

Picture provides 40,000ft. v.

40,000ft. v. is classified.

Why is a map useful?

Think direction.

Think full picture.

Q

>>10294576

Presumably, stop 'S' being enroute to Stansted would be a pick-up stop where customers can not be dropped-off.

IDK if there may be significance related to Q pics, however, think of the drop regarding windows good for the good players. Maybe the comm was to walk down the street and get on that Coach to Stansted. In which case a car attack would not necessarily mean the car was the weapon. Q direction to look at the vehicles on the street. The coach, not a weapon. The target of an attack, perhaps. And not necessarily a terrorist like attack but perhaps one where there'd be an interception of someone prepared to walk down that street to the coach stop and get for Stansted.

Trains from Stansted Airport to London Charing Cross

https://www.thetrainline.com/train-times/stansted-airport-to-london-charing-cross

Trains from London Charing Cross to Stansted Airport

https://www.thetrainline.com/train-times/london-charing-cross-to-stansted-airport

>>10286030

These London pics not necessarily taken by Q. On the other hand if taken by Q then could use the posted date as a 'not earlier than' bookend. That would sandwich the black box pic by the beginning and completion of POTUS visit to London. 13 JUL 2018 to 14 JUL 2018.

Going by the evidence within the frames, however, the time range is moar broad. The sticker/gum residue on the black box has been best matched, so far, by an SV image from JAN 2018. And the pattern changed distinctly by the time a vid of the scene was posted to YT on 27 AUG 2018. The black box would then have been sandwiched between those two dates - prolly this can be tightended further as we hunt for Q matches.

The first time range is situated within the broader second time range. Also Q's posted date sits about one month before the 'not after' bookend of 27 AUG 2018.

>>10286030

Yeh, black box is a standalone within the London collections - standalone in terms of chronology. Stands outside the 2013/2014 frame.

Gonna re-state previous posting. Disregard previous.

The time and date on which the black box was dropped by Q is the de facto 'not later than' bookend.

So far, the pictorial evidence provides a broader time range of a few months. JAN 2018 to the date on which a vid was posted which shows distinct changes in the pattern of stickers/residue on the box - 27 AUG 2018. The posted date of the Q pic sits well inside those two bookends. Of course, the Q timestamp is the best bookend we have for any of the London pics.

Black box taken between JAN 2018 and 28 JULY 2018.

If the pic was taken during the POTUS visit, or at least within a week or so either side of that visit, then, those few weeks sit well within, and fairly close to, the end of the currently time range supported by pictorial evidence.

Process of elimination will narrows this down.

Very rough vid of that part of Bus no.11 route that runs from Charing Cross by Trafalgar Square and south on Whitehall to Parliament and then westward to the foot of the Western Towers of Westminster Abbey and, then, a small hop past THE SANCTUARY and past the Bus stops at NIOC HOUSE on Victoria Street. ca MAR 2018.

Vid might be used to gain perspective on distances and time to travel those distances in general area along major route to and from Bus Stop 'S'. Timer included in topright of frame. Various locations along route pointed out.

https://youtu.be/NftCiMznYdk

BLACK BOX view from south side VICTORIA ST 1 MAR 2017.

https://youtu.be/2brgwa96SPc

>>10306058

34 posts. 0 content. Filtered.

>>10293539 - bus 11 from bus stop S toward Trafalgar

>>10305939 - bus 11 from Trafalgar toward bus stop S

>>10306938 cheers Anon, first was sped-up and second has a timer top left corner.

>>10310770

Time to FEED

• audio/video/data feed

• deliver broadcast of info - the truth

Discovery

We have the source.

• Julian Assange

• Josef Mifsud

• Moar

Why is there a constant flow of disinformation being pushed re: Q?

• The enemy can not attack the info directly.

• The enemy can not attack the source.

• Rely on lack time taken to self-corroborate

• Discredit the info/source indicrectly

• Counter with logical thinking and win

re -

Q 1595

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 267e20 No.1918277

Jun 26 2018 22:10:09 (EST)

Desperate agencies do stupid things.

Dead cat bounce.

You may have the site but we have the source.

https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1011441579565953025

Panic is good.

Panic is right.

July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.

Conspiracy no more.

Time to FEED.

Q

Q 1842

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.139

Aug 11 2018 12:12:31 (EST)

These people are stupid!

https://www.cohenmilsteinprocessserver.com

"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself."

Discovery.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/400882-wikileaks-says-senate-panel-requested-assange-testimony-in-russia-probe

Do you believe in coincidences?

We have the source.

Q

Q 3312

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 6661a0 No.6138770

Apr 11 2019 13:34:08 (EST)

If we are merely a LARP asking questions on the Chans, why are we being attacked daily by some of the world's biggest media co's, social media co's deliberately applying censorship/banning, shills paid/inserted to disrupt (media matters), blue checkmark coordinated attacks, etc.?

All for a 'conspiracy' on the Chans?

All for a 'LARP'?

Why is there a constant flow of disinformation being pushed re: Q?

Example:

Disinformation push re: Mueller is a white hat.

FAKE & FALSE narrative.

Think BLOCKADE.

When you can't attack the information directly, you attack the source, if that fails, you 'create false misleading information' to discredit knowing 'select' 'unaware' followers would not take the time to self-corroborate the claims (same vehicle/tactics used by FAKE NEWS media).

Logical thinking always wins.

Nothing can stop what is coming.

As the target(s) turn to the other side, the attacks will intensify.

We have the source.

Q

Winter snowfall, heavy, in 2013/2014, 2015/2016, and 2017/2018.

No snow evident in black box pic.

Anyway, see pic. Snowfall blanketed London in late FEB 2018 which would be inside the time range so far established by pictorial evidence for the Black Box pic at bus stop 'S'. Snow days 26-to-28 FEB and 1-to-2 MAR .

Process of Elimination. 27 FEB to 2 MAR 2018.

>>10226357

NOTABLE NOM

>>10316746

>>10332356

For the 2013/2014 timeframe we have 4 well-supported candidates left standing for ROT1?

21 NOV 2013

20 DEC 2013

19 JAN 2014

18 FEB 2014

This short list, in itself, provides a narrowed range between the bookends of 21-NOV-2013 AND 18-FEB-2014. A span of 3 months. Gud foundation for further diggs and speculations based on context re Q posts and future proves past or news unlocks past.

When all the werk done on this digg is at an end, sometime in distant future, it will have been built and developed from that foundation.

Anon, if you have a visual or two that helps illustrate this, please post, or repost, and will do best to incorporate into the vid series. even a basic description would suffice. Have been using placeholders for this very thing, so far, and am grateful for your strong efforts in producing a result.

CHEERS.

>>10335381

THAT is the key point on which focus is fully and unambiguously well-justified.

To wit - Waning Gibbous Moon in the Q pic is located where, according to science, it was at that time, that date, that street location with that view of the sky.

NOTABLE summary of the night sky dig for ROT1.

>>10335098

Re-read Q1455 with Q1456. Re-read Q1454 in the context given by Q. One follows the other. Focus on one may be apt but not to the detriment of reading the other two. Both are of high value for LONDON PICS.

Q1455 - in part

London pics [prev].

Year determined?

Relevant.

2015/2016.

Re-read Q128 which reads like a lesson on reading/forming Q maps. Here is part of it, but re-read the whole post.

Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you.

What is a map?

Why is a map useful?

What is a legend?

Why is a legend useful?

What is a sequence?

Why is this relevant?

When does a map become a guide?

What is a keystone?

Everything stated is relevant.

Everything.

Future provides past.

Map provides picture.

Focus on the sequence, for example. Now, look at Q1455 again. Which of the LONDON PICS were dropped previous to Q1455? List these in THEIR given sequence.

When you have done that, then, please explain your remarks regarding distraction.

Note that 2015/2016 was also specifically mentioned in Q1899. linked by theme, topic, locations? No link?

>>10335537

According to your own post, the moon in ROT1 looked like it was square - to you. Subjective speculation. Provide pictorial evidence from that location which shows a square lamp or light source behind The Eye at that height and so forth. You asserted it was not the moon. Please demonstrate it was not the moon the best way you can.

And, of course, pixels are square, which does not support your assertion that the image does not show the moon. Your assertion, Support it with facts, please. Or you are left asserting your contrarism with a mere 'looks like'. That would be ok, of course, but it woud rely on quite a different standard than the objective and scientific aproach taken by Gibbous Moon Anon.

>>10335791

Note that Q 1456 displayed an embedded post from Anonymous. The poster added commentary to DJT's tweet. But before reading that commentary, read what was said 1-by DJT and 2-by the article quoted.

Spygate was in full force in DEC 2015. If so, then, it started before that date. Q added that the DJT tweet was meant to provide a time guide. Not a standalone date. Next, Q pointed at the annual theme park held in London during December. Winter Wonderland featured in the pic Q dropped with that post. So, both the time of year, DEC, and the event, Winter Wonderland, together provide a timeframe.

Now it is worth a 2nd look at the capitalization of timeframe - Timeframe. What might capitalization such as that mean in the comms that Q has engaged in with Anons? If that does not seem worthwhile to explore, ok, put it aside and return to the difference between the time range that was meant with DEC 2015 and the timeframe provided by Winter Wonderland in DEC in London.

If inclined, considered difference between a range and a frame. Think contact window. Time is now. Think limits, high and low, near and far, before and after, sooner and later, wider and narrower. Range. Frame. Don't be distracted by confirmation bias, if you can help it. Bias seeps in, alwlays, even when we are aware that it can and that it does.

Now re-read Q1455 but read as an instruction. Determined the year of the PREVIOUS London pics. That year is relevant. In 2015/2016 find the markers. Markers are street updates and updates to surroundings.

Finding such markers is not a distraction. Compare markers in 2015/2016 to those markers in the previous London pics. What you will find is that those are not dated 2015/2016. But there is a time range and there is a Timeframe.

Expand to other London Pics and 2013/2014 is confirmed by updates in the street and in surroundings. If the sky is not part of the surroundings, then, the pic would be indoors, prolly. If the season or time of year was not included in surroundings, then, Q's text about what event happens in December needs another reading. And so forth.

However, the IRAN theme was there in front of us the whole time, in the black box pic. But it is outside of the 2015/2016 and 2013/2014 chronological limits. It extends into the future from the earlier pics of 2013/2014 and the DJT tweet that said that Spygate was in full op by DEC 2015 - and so had its start, its orgin, earlier. And, presumably, the IRAN theme and context is broader than the limit of DEC 2015.

Think mirror.

>>10335926

Waiting for proper facts to support your assertion that the moon did not appear in ROT1. Your well-seasoned learning on how to read the map ought to make this a snap for you. If not, that is ok. Falling short means there is room for improvement and further learning on your part.

God bless.

>>10336191

TYAnon for all. The vids are close to done. My time is short but there's nothing quite as stubborn as an Anon on a mission. Kek. Will have to chose a fairly arbitrary point to pinch-off and expect updates to follow as future proves past. Limited objective remains to establish firm foundation for dating the scenes in Q's London Pics. Greatly satisfied with the additional info from the digs dug here. Immenasely proud to have played small part here. Take the goal of a visual record as a contribution that is product of wide-raning efforts on the boards and somewhat beyond.

Tidal still of interest, imo, as it has gud chance of being linked with lunar/sky dig. Vids will be in a series of shorts and will start with an overview that references those shorts for those interested in the details. Further details will have to be 'footnoted' as per your lists and such. Many still images will prove superior to vid for the laser-focus of some key Anons both present here and elsewhere.

Organic is something tried to cook into the look and feel of the vids. Challenging, the whole sheband, to prevent scope creep.

When you notice this Anon is not posting, prolly very, very close to finishing vids. Otherwise, I try to help digs where I can just due to hyper familiarity with pictorial evidence.

WWG1WGA

Current Occupiers

http://4victoriastreet.co.uk/local-occupiers/

NIOC HOUSE

>>10278687, >>10281196, >>10282068

The bus stop in the RED BUS pic is located at a corner at the end of Coventry Street where there is no TfL route. The stop, or rather the bus stand, serves coaches - specifically The Original Tour, which has open top double deckers. So, unfortunately, the strike and the temp use of old bus models won't help date that particular pic. The Original Tour did not use enclosed top deck double deckers, so we strike out on that one, too - pun intended.

However, there would be other occassions and reasons for a private hire to appear at that particular stop, with passengers loaded in the top deck as per the Q pic. Have not found a specific hotel offering such a means to get to, say, Christmas shopping tours or to Winter Wonderland, however, both seem plausible. Just left with speculation on that, for now. Another possibility is the Casinos in proximity. Or even something like an event held at Leicester Square, such as the winter theme park that gets setup there - recall the ferris wheel. I think I have the comparny and bus matched but am seeking confirmation - direct from the company if possible or by some other reliable source - before posting anything in that regard.

>>10335926, >>10336260

You have failed to provide proper facts to support your assertion that the moon did not appear in ROT1.

If you continue to fail to back upyour assertion here, then, your own actions will serve to demonstrate that your bombast a waste of pixels. If you remain here to shill, distract, and further waste pixels, then, you will exemplify self-neutering.

Cheerio.

>>10357319

For clarity's sake, please state precisely what you think has been asserted, by Q, that is somehow the target of an attempt to 'debunk'. Please be specific.

>>10357783

Calm and cool, fren. Like a breeze off the summer lake. Kek.

Would happily discuss the question that Anon put forth. The basis for that question is of interest because expecting it to be a common starting point for many good and faithful patriots who have contributed in many different ways to this movement. It is a question that needs to be addressed forthrightly.

For me, at least, that means clarification of the question's basis. What, if anything, has been asserted by Q that the questioner thinks has become a target of an attempted 'debunking of Q'?

The Anon's was a fair question, to be expected, and clarification is a reasonable request, and ought to have been expected by the questioner.

For all comers to this discussion please consider a few gems from our favorite Anon.

Q 768

The 'proofs' are important.

'Proofs' provide new 'eyes' ability to question.

This board in the coming months will be spread & discussed across ALL PLATFORMS.

Important to be prepared.

We will help.

TRUTH always wins.

Q 2504

A picture is worth many sentences.

Has POTUS ever made a statement that hasn’t been proven to be correct (future)?

Think timing.

And we might also compare with Q 1454, 1455, 1456 in the context of London pics. Guidance that relies on the use of discernment and knowing that logical thinking wins.

Q 2381

Exclude emotion and personal desire, instead use logic and critical thinking based on situational awareness.

Q 2604

Think for yourself.

Trust yourself.

Research for yourself.

Be in control of yourself.

NEVER let someone else DRIVE YOU.

Those who try to DRIVE YOU are not your friend.

Cheers.

>>10355693

Four Q posts on that topic were dropped that day.

One was a correction and another confirmed the need to correct that error. In the mix were two moar time references:

• Think 2015.

• Long day.

Instead of dividing the events as either after or before 2016, return to the Timeframe that Q had already been presented drop 1455. To wit, the winter months that straddle New Year Eve. The time guide was DEC 2015 when Spygate was in full force, as per POTUS's tweet depicted in the embedded pic, strzo 2015.PNG. Winter months were evoked with the reference to the annual theme park, Winter Wonderland in Hyde Park. That event runs from NOV to JAN each year, most of it happening during DEC. So POTUS gave guidance, Spygate began before it was in full force in DEC 2015. And Q provided the Timeframe, winter months.

Q instructed that we also compare against 2.16.18 on which date Q had previously dropped a pic of a group of pedestrians crossing Victoria Embankment at the junction with Northumberland Avenue in Westminster, London, UK. And added, The Corinthia Hotel.

Look for the markers of updates in the surroundings. Here we might also refer in the same sense to updates in physical landscape. Note the time and note the vehicles on the street. That pointed at the changes in the lanes that were made during 2015/2016 such that vehicular lanes were reduced to make room for cycle lanes on Victoria Embankment. Construction of new Cycle Superhighway began in LATE APR 2015 and further road works were start a short while later at the outset of the Tideways project near the junction captured in Q's London pics. These changes disrupted traffic both for the bikes and the vehicles. So the Q pics of that street scene included updates that help to bracket the latest at which these pics could have been taken. Had to be before construction began..

To date the pics more closely, gotta look at the earliest at which they coud have been taken. Details begin to narrow the time range. For example, there was a bike hire docking station that changed from blue bikes to red bikes, again in mid APR 2015, which means we can move the booked from end of APR 2015 to MID APR 2015.

And that leads us into deeper scrutiny of the pictorial evidence presented within the frames of Q's pics. This is why, imo, Q capitalized Timeframe in addition to instructing us to find the markers in the pics. One of the first things noticed by Anons was the funnel of the TATTERSHAL CASTLE. It changed, as Anon noted a bit earlier in this bread, in 2015 - the steamer was towed to drydock for refurbishment and a change in colour scheme. That pushed the time range back to the winter of 2014/2015 - before MID JAN 2015, actually.

Anons also noted that the Winter Wonderland pic that featured the roller coaster ride had a sign on it that pre-dated the winter of 2014/2015. Further examination showed that the pic could not have been taken in the winter of 2012/2013 and could only have been taken when the theme park map and layout, as evidenced in varioius open sourced pics and vids, matched Q during the winter of 2013/2014.

And so it went for each pic in the London Pic collection. Repeatedly, the pictorial evidence pointed right at the winter of 2013/2014.

Q provided guidance and a Timeframe, not a specific date. That is how Anons have followed through on Q's drops to build a solid foundation upon which further digs and reasoning can arise toward the time when future proves past or news unlocks past.

Godspeed Anons All.

>>10362022

Kek.

>>10362022

Not a theory. Facts drawn from the evidence. So no theory to debunk. Just the facts.

Got a problem with the facts, then, you've got a problem with Q. Hence your obfuscations. Old playbook, kid.

LONDON PICS

Compare against 2.16.18.

One of several possiblle meanings.

This would point to finding the links between each London Pic and all the others. It appears, to me, to be an implicit - certainly not a clearcut explicit - instruction on how to view this collection of pics that depict certain scenes at certain times during the winter of 2013/2014.

Those links can be found and some have been discussed already here. But what about the Black Box pic? It was taken a few years more recently than the others. It is quite some distance away from any of the other scenes. And it is a pic of some stickers rather than surveillance of some individuals. Seemingly.

There are ways, based on the pictorial evidence, to link this pic with the others, but, for now, consider that it was posted in a drop which included an embedded EMBANKMENT pic - LONDON2847. For context see Q 1728. AND SEE Q 1723/4 re PS round 2. ALSO SEE Q 1720-to-1722 re Lisa Page.

As the EMBANKMENT pics can be linked to the pics at the other London sites through pictorial evidence within their frames, and as the way in which these pics were dropped suggest interlinks, what can we find to link Black Box with any one of the others?

It is tempting to immediately skip this consideration and rush to the IRANIAN connections. But for a moment focus on the pictorial evidence and how that might chain this pic to each of the others.

The black box is at a bus shelter. Stop 'S' - as per features that match at the site and in the pic. This stop does not serve TfL routes but is a coach stop on routes that run to destinations outside of London. Two routes. Moar on these later. Stop 'S' is on the northside of the road - the side that traffic moves eastward. Reminder to non-UK drivers, we drive on the left side of the road. So the coaches that stop at 'S' are on their way out of town. As such, this is a pick-up only stop. Not a drop-off stop. Alighting only. Across the road is another coach stop, of course, but the black box is on the way out of town.

Right, now there is also a bus stop nearby, Stop 'R', which does serve the TfL routes. And there are several of them that run through this part of Victoria Street. Between 'R' and 'S' is a telephone booth. This arrangement is very near THE SANCTUARY which is at the foot of the Western Towers of Westminster Abbey. Moar on that later, also. For now consider that these two stops serve, together, like a quiet hub that connects with all of London and beyond.

See the pic of the TfL routes that stop at 'R' and which could drop-off/pick-up users of 'S' - or those who might walk from or to THE SANCTUARY. Ok, but all of that requires that we lift up our chins and look around the content, the black box, of Q's pic. In that pic is the label or utility sticker for Clear Channels. That might mean, in this context, a simple 5:5 for comms with Anons. It could mean any number of things. Channels are also routes or pathways of different kinds. Communication channels and transport/traffic channels, and the like. Given that this is a pic at a bus stop it might be meaningful that at lest two TfL routes connect the black box site with each of the other scenes depicted in Q's London Pics.

Just moar factual grist for the mill.

>>10372176

There are Q posts at different agreggators that show Q responding to an Anon re the dating of the London pics and then the correction with confirmation of the need to make the correction promptly. That all seems genuine.

A shill tactic is to accuse Anons of 'debunking' Q or to make the insinuation that Q communicated something he did not actually state. You might recall the incident where a lot of anticipation was built for a specific action to take place on a specific date. It was not based on a Q statement but rather on various combinations of speculations and calculations by many Anons. The shills piled on to increased the spread of the expectation that would go unfulfilled.

Here we are dealing with the fact that arise from the pictorial evidence and have, for the much greater part, restrained from speculations, except where it might advance a dig on the pictorial evidence. It is always important to compartmentalize those speculations from what Q has actually said.

I suppose there is a chance that readers of our progress here could misunderstand if they had been exposed to a really hard push to sell 2015/2016 as meaning something that Q had not actually stated. And so we can prepare for just that and welcome inquiries of that kind - as further preparation. To the extent that a query is merely posed as an excuse, evident in tone and follow-up, to make accusations rather than to address the query itself, we can use discernment to put those aside.

If an query is made which assumes this dig has contradicted Q, the first thing is to clarify what the questioner thinks Q actually said and how that might be established as a fact, before going further. In the recent discussion, the harkening of 2015/2016 and the partial re-visit of the Q posts in which Q self-corrected is an example of how partial recall can leave out significant data or facts.

Might be a good idea to prepare an FAQ to save time. Stick it to the top of abread, for instance, with aproprite links.

>>10372290

Do you assert that Q stated that the pics were taken in 2015/2016?

What, if anything, might be/become significant in the filename of the black box pic? The other London Pics have moar readily understandable filenames. This one stands on that basis, alone.

07949FC4-4787-4F9B-B8C8-C81724DAA4BA.png

Q 1725

https://qanon.pub/index2.html?q=decipher%20re#1724

>>10371278

>>10380619

07949FC4-4787-4F9B-B8C8-C81724DAA4BA.png

Hyphen = punctuation?

07949FC4

4787

4F9B

B8C8

C81724DAA4BA

ANONs?

>>10387593

> and started comparing notes? Sounds like a good thing.

Yes, indeed, a good thing. The Paris pics might be one such place to begin such an effort.

Two Aussies discuss with Canadian the harsh government controls being implemented on citizens. The governments are acting like real branches of the Chinese Communist Party. Freedoms in peril. Seems that small pockets are tested to see how far governments can go to control the population. Then in come the facial recognition technolgies and on and on. People have been lulled and this is the wake-up call. If we do not act now, we may be facing a very harsh counter-reaction met with worse government crack downs. It is on the way here and we can already see it, for now, encroaching there.

https://youtu.be/mjt0LxS7Vmc

>>10415551

Not prev GenQR Anon, but might this enhanced version be of use? Let me know what specifically you'd need enhanced. Region inside frame, colours, contrast, size, and so forth. Will try until have prev Anon sees and acts on request.

>>10433531

Did prev enhancement do the trick?

>>10432047

Think an object was spotted but unidentified. The view in Q pic was roughly toward the southeast-east. See enlarged area of nightsky over WM coaster.

>>10434813

Prev orientation is off as moar like southeast-east is behind camera of Q pic with Wheel in background of WM and sky object overhead.

Here are map/pics from notes. Haven't lined-up on a compass for you, but the pathways are marked and two ref points encircled. Look for reformers tree monument and for restaurant at Serpentine in real world.

>>10436544

>>10436547

>>10436553

>>10436557

>>10436544

Aerial photos compared, 2012 v 2013.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKFOqGerl5Q

>>10442567

Does the analysis of the object in night sky over MW coaster now provide additional info for dating that particular Q pic moar narrowly? Based, at latest, on probability the object is Polaris at that alt and so forth? If the time rangne is narrowed, what are the bookends - from possible to most likely?

Cheers Anons, gud werk once again.

CH

Corinthia Hotel

Crossfire Hurricane

Have we a list of individuals from DOJ/FBI who travelled to London in DEC 2016?

TXTs-

2016-12-01 OUTBOX Technically not sure you can talk to andy about it. \U0001f621

01:52:48 Thu

2016-12-01 INBOX Yeah well Jims too blindly boyscoutish and others not thoughtful so

02:05:14, Thu l can talk to him about his experience pre recusal. l'm not asking for

decisions. l'm asking how to think about it.

OK, think PER DIEM

'She might do touristy things though, since it's been two decades since she was there.'

Seems that, on that particular 2016 trip, they left after 1-DEC-2016 and got back before 10-DEC-2016.

2016-12-10 lt was OK. l toid him we heard via ! l ._.Jand that we were

17:51:48, Sat all disappointed. He said he underst oad, but ne was able to talk

that way broadly withaut giving any specifics, sa he thinks it

helped rather than hurt. Said we hadn't closed anything, and

generally ta lked about aur path forward. Said they didn't ask for

an update when we got back, and that he thought we were in a

INBOX good place.

>>10460365

The Corinthia Hotel

TCH

CH1

CH2

CH3

CORINThIA[NS]

Q 1432

1-Cor 13 14-13

Q 1455

Biblical

ROT3

Q 1707

When did No Name travel to the UK?

Embedded x2 in Q 1708.

Q 1708

+22

Q 1723

PS Round 2

Decipher warning to UK.

Q 1764

Think FISA.

Think NO NAME.

Lonson station 2014-2017

Q 1799

Think new arrivals.

Q 1925

Timeline change.

Watch the budget.

Think per diem.

CH1 CH2 CH3.

ROT3

Q 1948

When was the Joint Plan of Action executed?

Late 2013?

Significance of [Q] 1948.

Q 1972

Desperate to SHELTER.

Define 'Shelter'.

A place giving temporary protection from bad weather or dange.

Note the punctuation, single quote mark open/close, followed by period. Not double marks, period within. Significance of [Q] 1972.

Q 2217

FVEY.

Safety House Build.

PIC related.

Bus Shelter 'S' x2.

Q Parking, nearby.

Route.

Think Orign[al] Tour, stops/stands.

Who are FVEY.

WHO.

Happy hunting, Anons.

BLESSINGS, ALL.

>>10460569

CHINA VIRUS

How Justin Trudeau's Pro-Communist Ideology is Putting Canadians in Danger.

Excerpts and paraphrasings below.

The pandemic revealed a much deeper problem in Canada: the dangerous political connections that Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party have forged with the Communist Party of China, ties that remain strong today.

Why does China, the virus infector, run the World Health Organization?

Theresa Tam is Canada's Chief Public Health Officer. At the same time, she is an employee of the World Heath Organization.

Millions of Canadians were essentially banned from travel within and outside of Canada. Those who remained employed were restricted to travel within local districts and were subjected to 14-day quarentine if they travelled farther afield.

Throughout the pandemic, passengers landing from China could immediately board domestic Canadian flights to any smaller city, without quarentine.

Trudeau, by order of council, stealthily granted 150,000 Chinese citizens exemptions to the Canadian government restrictions on foreign travel into Canada during the current COVID-19 Lockdown. Hundreds specifically were residents of Wuhan. Meanwhile Wuhan was in lockdown and the Chinese government had barred residents of Wuhan from entering other Chinese cities and provinces for any reason at all.

More than 1.9 million Chinese citizens currently hold valid temporary resident visas to travel to Canada. Of those, about 40,000 are residents of Wuhan.

Trudeau hired every China loybbist and corporate shill he could find. More than any other issue the single-most-pronounced characteristic of any given Trudeau staffer is that they are part of the China lobby.

Kompromat.

Example. Former Canadian AMB to China remarked that anada had more in common with China under Xi Jinping than it did with the United States under Donald Trump.

Canada's Environment Minister works for the Chinese Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, which is an office of the Chinese government. It is governed by the CCP's national five-year plans.

No other country actually embeds its cabinet ministers in a foreign government, and task them with making Chinese people better off.

The Liberal Party of Canada has an in-house think-tank called CANADA 2020. The CCP, via Huawei, has been dumping cash all over it for at least five years.

>>10460715

Of the members of FVEY, how is it that Canada has not been implicated in Spygate, yet?

Ties between Canada and the other members remain strong across the board. Recall that Q asked which country RR had travelled to - CANADA - and pointed out that those responsible for spygate related matters were present during that visit.

Recall that Biden went to Canada on his farewell tour. See PIC. Did he not also travel to London a few times as VP but not only as VP.

Define shelter.

>>10460737

CHINA

IRAN

JOINT TREASON.

Bus shelter 'S' on Victoria Street.

Bus shelter 'S' at Canada House, Trafalgar Square

Q 2217

FVEY.

Safety House Build.

>>10460774

Q 2217

FVEY.

Safety House Build.

>>10460737

Biden, Viva La Canada.

Correction, Vive le Canada.

Swap e for a. x2.

Exchange shelters VERY sernior member.

Power is all reflective.

Had I a glass.

Through the Looking Glass.

When I speak, I speak for him and they know it.

National Security Briefing.

I depart the Oval Office.

Bridge.

How do you repair a bridge without shutting it down.

Where does Canada CONNECT between the players. HOW. When. At each stage of spygate. The London Pics traverse London hubs/connections.

>>10460783

Escape from Iran: The Canadian Caper 1981

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB8DFd5uxXE

safe house

>>10460824

Read between the lines.

The Iranian Humiliation Trump Is Trying to Avenge

The president’s approach to the Islamic Republic appears stuck in 1979.

JANUARY 7, 2020

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/trump-iran-hostage-crisis-history/604516/

Example.

Two years later, he tweeted:

US froze $8B in Iranian assets during ’79 Hostage Crisis. Now Obama is giving it back to Iran while Christian Pastor is jailed. Don’t do it!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2013

The consistency of Trump’s views on Iran is remarkable because his positions on practically everything else (the Iraq War, his party affiliation, abortion, health care) have shifted, sometimes repeatedly, over the years. But the issues on which he has been consistent are those, like trade protectionism and immigration, on which his views were forged in the ’70s and early ’80s, when Trump was a young man. These are also the issues on which he has been most persistent as president—and most impervious to persuasion or new information.

Example.

Though he railed against the deal, he has not clearly articulated what about the deal he dislikes or would have changed, other than the fact that the U.S. freed up frozen Iranian funds. (No one tell Trump that Reagan, his hero on Iran matters, sold arms to Iran in violation of U.S. law.) Unlike some critics who argue that the U.S. should not negotiate with Tehran, Trump says he would simply negotiate a better deal. Given his superficial understanding of the deal, and his results in other international negotiations, this is dubious.

ALSO think mirror. Iran's view different from 1979?

Example.

The hostage crisis was a low point, and refusing to move beyond it creates a foreign-policy dead end. If it’s always 1979, it’s always 1979.

>>10460460

>>10460783

BUS STOP 'S'

Define shelter.

>>10468841

Interdasting.

It may be multi layers of sheltering in that exchange. First, the OIG attributed this exchange to someone else, not Lisa Page. Second, NUNES has attributed it to KC. Third, it was a sort of assumption on the boards that this was in someway attributable to JPC.

Fourt, and this is my take, 'LP' appeared in Q's post before the phrase and yet there was no punctuation to indicate attributation. No colon, no comma, no dash, and no quote marks or other marks to indicate the preceding pair of letters designated the speaker/texter. Even the two letters, L and P were not punctuated with periods.

Couple of possibilities arise from that. The letters referred to two individuals treated as one, as a couple. Lisa and Peter. The phrase followed them. CONSEQUENT TO THEM. It did not necessarily proceed FROM them. Like a message TO Lisa and Peter from within the released texts.

That raises the question of meddling with the original source, the actual texts, and interference with witnesses - cooperating or not. So this scenario seems doubtful just due to the complexity of handling the evidence in such a manner, brazenly. So, on reflection, I had rejected this explanation a few months after conjuring it up thru plausible speculation. Not as plausible as other possibilities, was my assessment.

The Biden angle seems to me moar plausible given the mistakes within the phrase that mirror other misuses that were 'on script'. Biden was reading his speach in Canada. His gaffe was not off-the-cuff. And the timing fits with the exchange that Q recreated from the basics in the OIG report.

Gud idea to compare how the report displayed the exchange, how the original texts displayed, and how it was displayed in Q post.

If the exchange was inserted into the texts, on the assumption it would be read by the relevant parties - rather than those texting back and forth to one another - then it could well carry the meaning of a request or demand for a face-to-face meeting. Then, at the time the text was generated.

What was the date? Sorry, haven't got the report in front of me at the moment.

>>10471308

Also there appears to have been another FBI/CIA pair of players who were directly involved in the process whereby KC exchanged or swapped in a 'not' in the description ofd Carter Page's contacts with Russians. Recall that CP met with the foreigners at the request of the CIA to investigate these particular Russians and so CP had served as an agent of the CIA during those meetings or conversations. KC changed that into a 'not' working for the CIA.

In the entry of his plea of guilty, KC inserted a note that he had not known, at the time, that his wording was untruthful. He plead that yes he did make the change and was guilty of doing so. Seemed like a small technicality to be ironed out in coming proceedings but might also have been a hint of moar revelations on the way that pull in moar so-far-unknown individuals across the process of Crossfire Hurricane.

Recall that there is a distinction between the FBI personnel who were 'loaned' or assigned to the Mueller investigation and the personnel directly managed by Mueller, and his commrades. This distinction applied to budget as well as authority and chain of command as well as regulations governing conduct.

Define crossfire.

pic related.

>>10460858

JOHN SOLOMON was in convo with RUDY GUILANI recently. Discussed the motivations that drove the players to set in motion the SPYGATE operation as a cover-up of the IRAN dealings underpinnings re U1. The Canadian connexion is deeply part of the interlinking or bridging flesh that facilitated the origins of it all. Canada has served as a conduit in some way but also as a vantage point - with the U1 arrangement but also with the CHINA attacks still underway. In the mix, between these two big operations - RUS and CHI ops - there lives the IRAN deal.

>>10471402

JOHN SOLOMON

RUDY GUILIANI

https://youtu.be/OO1r3HRNGZU

Do these revelations from JS's investigative reporting suggest framework for dating the events depicted or represented in the London Pics?

>>10470488

The text exchange was supposedly betwixt the 'lovers' but I can see how it could be read differently. Change seats coz she was included on a trip. LP was resented for going around the normal org chart of comms, authority, and her role was rather ambiguous, too. So, yeh, will have to double-check who texted and who they were referring to. OIG report.

>>10471308

> No colon, no comma, no dash, and no quote marks or other mark

Correction. Q post did include double-quotation marks. But no other punctuation to indicate attributation of what was quoted. Just a suggestion, ambiguous, based on sequence alone.

The sequence continued with [J_C] and thus the suggestion that the phrase was attributable to JPC.

Nunes asked who spoke French. Later he has attributed the phrase to JC. It may be that the person who spoke French was not the same as the person to whom the phrase is attributable.

Think of a catch phrase, originated by someone but repeted by others. Biden hacked a French phrase, quite publicly, in Canada around the same time as this text exchange. A phrase like that can be a sort of in-the-club keyword or even password that carries other meanings.

Speculation is fueled not by the phrase itself nor by the specefic context of the texting, but by the players to whom it has been attributed. In that regard, the cast of players seems to be broader than at first thought, at the time of the Q post appearance.

>>10460715 - UK BREAD

>>10460737 - UK BREAD

CHINA VIRUS

How Justin Trudeau's Pro-Communist Ideology is Putting Canadians in Danger.

Excerpts

More than 1.9 million Chinese citizens currently hold valid temporary resident visas to travel to Canada. Of those, about 40,000 are residents of Wuhan.

Trudeau hired every China loybbist and corporate shill he could find. More than any other issue the single-most-pronounced characteristic of any given Trudeau staffer is that they are part of the China lobby.

Former Canadian AMB to China remarked that Canada had more in common with China under Xi Jinping than it did with the United States under Donald Trump.

Canada's Environment Minister works for the Chinese Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, which is an office of the Chinese government. It is governed by the CCP's national five-year plans.

No other country actually embeds its cabinet ministers in a foreign government, and task them with making Chinese people better off.

The Liberal Party of Canada has an in-house think-tank called CANADA 2020. The CCP, via Huawei, has been dumping cash all over it for at least five years.

Of the members of FVEY, how is it that Canada has not been implicated in Spygate, yet?

–

Ties between Canada and the other members remain strong across the board. Recall that Q asked which country RR had travelled to - CANADA - and pointed out that those responsible for spygate related matters were present during that visit.

>>10480407

Interview, book.

https://youtu.be/uuz9vpbY7bQ

Why did Justin Trudeau wait so long to restrict flights from China? Why did his top health bureaucrat tell us not to wear face masks? Why did the Liberals gather up Canada’s medical equipment and ship it to China as a gift?

Rebel News' Ezra Levant joined True North's Andrew Lawton to discuss all these glaring questions and his new book – China Virus: How Justin Trudeau's Pro-Communist Ideology Is Putting Canadians in Danger.

The book has content.

Unlike your dislike of the sauce that was requested.

Must really suck to be you.

>>10480649

The content of the book is well-documented.

Your blatherings are empty of real content.

Sucks to be you.

>>10483994

Your opinion based on your opinion amounts to little, if any, content.

Sucks being you.

>>10480461

Meanwhile Anons can judge for themselves. Listen to the interview. Read the book and its many, many, many footnotes and links to orignal sauces. And use logic. Reconcile the Trudeau govt pro-CHINA moves - during the entirety of the plandemic - and reconcile with the shill attacks on the author of the book.

Over the target, prolly.

Kek, the shill still has nothing to contribute.

The book, its content, got a prob with the book and, ya know, its content?

Right. Still sucks to be you.

>>10434813

LisaMI6 enhanced and enlarged version.

Note the closed gate at entrance to gangplank nearest to camera.

2nd version shows a little moar of the waterline against the river wall but there's a pretty gud shadow cast right there. Moorings a bit moar clear, too.

Let me know if it werks for ya, Anon.

>>10434813, >>10491689

This is 2nd version.

>>10491885

One comparison might be the height of the railing on Tatt's gangplank - bit higher than 1 m, it looks, but could search for pics or vids with individuals near or at the gate. The railing's full height - from top to below the footing area - is longer than the wall that is exposed above water.

>>10491885

Yeh, those look a bit like the lamp posts ontop of the wall in LISA and also found in SV images at the Tatt's entrance. Prolly these are standard along the embankment so city would have specs. Another way would be to compare with car lengths - of vehicles you might be able to get a reasonable measure for - and 'lie the lampost on its side' to compare and divide by quarters or something.

>>10491916

SV imageS in front of TATT with pedestrians. Also near the steps to the gangplank. See lampost and people sitting/standing at wall.

>>10491940

View over the embankment wall, near Horse Guards Ave, showing fairly high daytime tide, TATT in background down the way.

>>10491908

Very noice, considering her assignments during the past decade, including currently. There was speculation on the board, partly due to remarks in Q posts, that the usual official channels were not used during at least some of the spying on US citizens in UK at the time or times under scrutiny now. If I recall correctly, Q may have referred to Brennan and black ops, in this regard.

Recently re-read London-related drops and noticed that there is a fairly strong suggestion that the 2013/2014 winter months in UK were about the IRAN deal and about spying on CRUZ. Of course other habbenings like with Stain. And Cambridge.

>>10491916

Could scale according to size of people resting at the embankment wall in this SV image.

>>10491916

View from other side of the wall, from bridge, near vantage of LISA pic.

All in all, my guess is about 30-36 inches in height from pavement on the street side. On the river side, there seems to be a fairly clearly delineated 'shelf' at what looks like a high tide mark. My guess is about a yard to a metre. But don't take my guesses as well-informed as haven't been at the Embankment to see for myself.

>>10493082

Kek, I went by inseam and leg pant length. Same diff in this application, I gather. Noice poe there. Narrows the candidates or range somewhat. Conclusion?