Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 14, 2020, 10:29 a.m. No.10286030   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6153 >>7565 >>9103 >>0169 >>5250 >>5275 >>7307 >>3568 >>3717

>>10282972

 

>Anyway, IDK. Anons, do you see the need to discover a bridge or connection?

 

Agree on BLACK BOX pic as standalone.

Not sayin anyone should stop digging though. But do consider POTUS' 2-day trip in JULY 2018 for the BLACK BOX pic the most likely time for that pic. POTUS team was in town 13 and 14 JULY 2018. Q pic dropped 28 JULY 2018.

 

Also, I consider the above anon's contribution re the London train strike a VERY important dig. While it is circumstantial, like many of our observations, the important thing to remember is that it adds but DOES NOT CONTROVERT our estimated time frame for the RED BUS pic. Imho, it should be considered as possibly narrowing the RED BUD/PICCADILLY time by a good 3 MONTHS. This points toward a timeframe between FEB 2014 to MAY 2014 for that pic series. >>10278687

 

FLYNN Cambridge Dinner was February 2014. I get discrepancies from news articles on exact date of dinner. Some say FEB 6, others FEB 28. Anyone got the exact date?

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 15, 2020, 10:36 a.m. No.10298316   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9280

>>10272475

"some nice info is getting buried"

By anons digging on their own dig? Were you prevented from posting nice info?

Who is burying the bread now? Do you like the bread now? Or perhaps back when anons posted what they thought was interesting and left each other, left you alone. Did anyone harass you on this thread? Look at how fast the breads go in General Research. Do they stand around and admire someone's "nice post" and tell everyone to "Stop posting. Let's all stand around and admire this post I put up"? The breads move on, each anon digging what they like. And yes, nice posts are superseded by new posts every minute in the General thread. Want people to talk about your post? Don't just drop a news article like hanging a picture on the wall. This is not a museum for your posts. Engage more. Post good stories more. Add some discussion to what you post. Post fearlessly and encourage other anons to do the same. Don't be a gatekeeper. Follow the Golden Rule. Respect a poster who posts what they think is important. Expect the same from others. It's the best environment to share information. Be a team.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 16, 2020, 7:32 a.m. No.10306721   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7448

>>10306325

>Hi UK frens! Not trying to distract here but I think theyโ€™ve known for a long time that he would be President. At least as far back as the mid 90s.

The painting in the lower right was commissioned and displayed at the Denver airport in 93-95 along with a f*ton of other satanic and vile imagery. Theyโ€™re signaling him and showing future events.

So my point is, they knew, keep moving forward.

WWG1WGAWW

 

No distraction at all, Nice to have you visit us here. Must concede to you that DJT had been "threatening" to run for POTUS on and off for 20 years, but at some point in time you have to consider someone a "reluctant bride". My definition of announcing for the US Presidency was the forming of an election committee and actually announcing he was running, to include applying to be on the ballot in a few state primaries. I think most of our differences of opinion end there. They did know when he was finally going to go all-in. They knew because of illegal spying by 3-letter agencies. But again, Crossifire Hurricane did not start for a couple of years, and even look at the FBI predicates on Carter Page, Pdop, the Manafort plant. Those occurred in 2016. They were spying on DJT, but something else is afoot in London in 2013/2014. They were spying/maybe trying to set Flynn up. But as we are learning, Flynn could not have known about DJT running for office back then. So these London pics appear to be about something else. Some say Flynn was a threat to blowing the lid on DS treason even back then. Brennan made him look bad to Hussein. Flynn was fired. They thought their problems were solved. Then, they had to stop Flynn from coming back as NatSec Advisor to DJT.

About that picture and symbolism, IDK. It seems easy to say a picture of DJT has, for example, a dove and that other picture also has a dove and try to convict someone if something. Still hoping DJT is a true blue patriot. Are those paintings at that airport really weird? Hell yes. Super odd and dark.

Cheers, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 16, 2020, 11:24 a.m. No.10308082   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10307448

Anon, I never said the Denver airport is not some scary shit going on. I did take exception to that guy trying to associate DJT with some long cabal game plan and said so politely. Have seen the allegations of Trump in Freemasonry. I disagree with it though. The airport diggs are some creepy things that should be dug. All indications at the moment are that Trump was not part of (((their))) plan. They are fighting his presidency tooth and nail. Trump and the Plan are all we have got now. Am supporting completely. It's still healthy to keep a skeptical outlook though. One other thing, you will never hear this anon telling anyone not to investigate anything. Carry on.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 18, 2020, 12:20 p.m. No.10332356   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3904 >>2703 >>3581 >>5990 >>8367 >>3720 >>1927 >>7760

>>10316569

 

https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/uk/london/historic?month=11&year=2013

 

date weather moon azim./alt.

------------

11/21/13 CLEAR 125 deg/46deg

12/20/13 partly cloudy 125deg/39deg

1/19/14 CLEAR 138deg38deg

2/18/14 passing clouds 141deg/27deg

 

See also, moon visuals:

https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/moon/location.html

 

Above are best visual matches for Moon in ROT1 pic. Weather is for evening until midnight and after. Partly cloudy would not be good. Passing clouds could be a problem but site does not elab. on "passing clouds".

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 18, 2020, 3:51 p.m. No.10334419   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4474 >>4504 >>4596 >>4681 >>4797 >>5161 >>3581

>>10333904

>Anon, if you have a visual or two that helps illustrate this, please post, or repost, and will do best to incorporate into the vid series. even a basic description would suffice. Have been using placeholders for this very thing, so far, and am grateful for your strong efforts in producing a result.

 

Firstly, want to show ROT1 Moon with a circle around it for reference, to help get an idea of general shape. Have only one recomm for November. Orher date says partly cloudy.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 18, 2020, 4:09 p.m. No.10334596   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4681 >>3581

>>10334419

Going to show 2 dates to compare for February on the 18th and 19th. On BOTH dates the evening skies are reported as "Passing Clouds". This is assumed to be less cloudy than "Partially Cloudy" and should be, imo, still considered as possible.

There were, after all, some low (passing clouds?) seen in 2 of the CORINTHIA HOTEL pics. I would keep FEB in the running.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 18, 2020, 4:34 p.m. No.10334797   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5098 >>3581

>>10334419

Reposting possibles' description due to adding 2 dates and a discovered error using another date's info. Also, important- the azimuth /altitudes reported are for midnight.

The models shown were all done using a search time of 11:30pm rather than at midnight to prevent confusion as to the date being searched.

date weather azimuth/alt.(degrees)

-- --- ---

11/21/13 CLEAR 125/46

12/20/13 Partly cloudy 136/47

12/21/13 Partly cloudy 125/39

1/19/14 CLEAR 138/38

1/20/14 Clear til midnite then passing clouds 129/30

2/18/14 Passing clouds 141/27

2/19/14 Passing clouds 132//19

 

1/2014 weather reminds me of the Corinthia Hotel low clouds. Possibly clouds just making their appearance after an otherwise clear evening?

 

Good Hunting!

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 18, 2020, 6:47 p.m. No.10336191   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6363

>>10335547

Let us know when you are getting close on this vid. I will start trying to gather the different sauces together and post for you to have soon. So how are you doing on your vids? I was just wondering the other day- just how long your vids are expected to be in duration? And I suspect we may now have a fourth vid required? Oh, I forgot. Package deal. No matter. Will be fun to see them, no doubt. Much has been dug. They had better be long. Anons have discovered much. Much to be conveyed. If you think the tidal info still relevant, as an aside, will post a similar short list like the one above with comments.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 19, 2020, 11:44 p.m. No.10354846   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5321 >>5675

>>10353905

A good post anon. Just remember when you say "no one" posted anything about it to include yourself. I will say you may be the only one of those who are trash-talking other anons who has actually posted anything here. I am one of those whom you have been talking smack to. I had come here to post yet more for the ROT1 pic but I am not going to post, for now, lest you say I am trying to slide your post. A gud post and

aNOTABLE POST

Carry on, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 7:05 a.m. No.10357158   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7319 >>9363

>>10355675

>"Physical landscape +/- 'proves' it could not have been taken pre_2016. "

 

Anon, don't trust me, but go to the original anon conversations at the time if the Q post. Even they were commenting on how the Tattershall Castle's funnel was not painted that color-scheme could not have existed after 2014. They were baffled by that, but merely shrugged and moved on.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 7:30 a.m. No.10357404   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10355321

Am not feeling very persuasive atm, but will just tell you the abbreviated theory on this. I think the most fitting example of Qs (admitted) misdirection or disinformation was that post involving National Guard troops and Saudi Arabia. Q also says that punctuation matters. Read those posts again and notice Q lists things on different lines using a period after each line. Just keep an open mind that Q might be saying that the event captured IN THE PICTURE is relevant to events in 2015/2016.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 7:45 a.m. No.10357514   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10357319

>so we're here to debunk Q now are we ?

Not here to debunk Q. At the moment, just discussing a POST which anons have maybe misunderstood as Q saying that Embankment pic is from 2015/2016. What some of us think, is that Q meant that the event in the Q pic is RELATED to the 2015/2016 events.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 8:08 a.m. No.10357783   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7835 >>8172

>>10357579

Be calm, anon. The anon is at the very least engaging and having a conversation.

 

>>10357319

And I hope everyone can go to their separate corners and continue to discuss things. Unfortunately, these things have been discussed way back and anons don't feel a need to continue addressing them.

We have sometimes summarized what has been dug but not everything. The anon's vids were going to address all of this and I do find it a little ironic that, as his vids are nearing completion, that misunderstandings would begin. But maybe, a review discussion is in order.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 8:12 a.m. No.10357835   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10357783

"and anons don't feel a need to continue addressing them."

CORRECTION:

Sorry, came out the wrong way. Meant to say that anons might not feel the need to review stuff discussed way back because they felt the issue had been agreed upon.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 10:28 a.m. No.10359365   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9445 >>9504 >>9790

>>10358172

"Calm and cool, fren. Like a breeze off the summer lake."

The "Lac qui parle". The "lake that speaks".

Found that yesterday after an interesting Captcha yesterday that said "use lQp"

So, on another subject, I made some pretty gud night sky captures of the same dates I gave you weather info on. These are gud because anons can compare them for themselves. Imho, NOV has too high an altitude, and both DEC dates are not gud due to high altitude moon, weather is partly cloudy, and imo the absence of holiday banners on the TATTS' railing. Add NOV to that also imo.

Want to say I have no control over these night sky models other than I chose the date because of the best visual matches for a Waning Gibbous moon and for some reason(sarc) all the models show a Moon in the Southeast. I did not tell the app to please keep the Moons in the Southeast.

All of the models were searched using the same time of 11:59pm for relative comparison. The arrows mark the Longitude lines of the Compass. The convergence of these in what looks like a darts bulls-eye is the celestial pole. The Latitudinal lines are there to help gauge altitude of night sky objects. For altitude, picture an arc extending from the horizon(at zero degrees) to directly overhead (at 90 degrees). When discussing altitude, we mean a portion of this 90-degree arc.

Posting NOV 2013 here. Notice the altitude or elevation of the Moon is relatively high, about half-way up the 90-degree arc.

The rest to follow.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 1:36 p.m. No.10361446   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1554

>>10361003

Am not speaking for baker but I believe that proving those pics were taken between November 2013 and March 2014 will not make Q fall off his proverbial stool. I do suspect rather strongly that baker feels the same. Finding a different date for the Q pic does not discredit Q. It simply makes the timeline of the Plan much more interesting.

It also will help anons to look at different government figures and actors who were in office at that time, and people who visited or were in London during Winter 2013/2014.

How about the Winter Wonderland? You do know it was 2013 Winter Wonderland, right? VidAnon is getting close to posting on all of this relatively soon. But he does have some short vids up re the funnels on TATTS, and the Winter Wonderland being 2013, and the "bookends" on Piccadilly Circus. Just shorts. Won't take up much of anyone's time. Remember what I said: Q doesn't fall off his stool because a date is different on the pics.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 20, 2020, 1:52 p.m. No.10361620   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10361554

I just said Q is NOT a fraud and that Q is in no way discredited by the pictures being from Winter 2013/2014. Perhaps I have more faith in Q than you do, because the different timeframe does not bother me at all.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 21, 2020, 9:29 a.m. No.10371976   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3568 >>3717

>>10371278

Found an interesting coincidental bus time arrival times coincidence on this bus route that matches the bus stop number? 0133, 0148? 15-minute difference. But there must be hundreds and hundreds of bus stops with 15-minutes between pickups. Just thot I'd drop this in case it could mean something.

Anonymous ID: 7e3bcc Aug. 21, 2020, 6:30 p.m. No.10377871   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8039

>>10372775

"but there's that problem of the older breads getting pushed of so the links stop working."

 

What's going on with that? Is that just UK thread, or is it happening with every other thread? Needs to be fixed. Any word on that from CM?