Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 9, 2020, 7:18 p.m. No.10237565   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0430

>>10234923

Well, I am not qualified to fo those SV searches. But imho the box location has been determined with pics if the bus shelter number included.

Looking at the individual sticker appearances, most esp. the Q sticker, has the most value, again, imho.

But location, once determined, it is the LOCATION that seems most important along with the box. Can you explain why the pavement/pavers is important?

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 9, 2020, 8:31 p.m. No.10238258   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8316 >>1261 >>9820 >>3717

>>10234923

>JUNE 2016 and onward appears the shelter had been replaced by JCDecaux setup. Also see AUG 2016, JAN 2018, APR 2019.

>Does the label on the black box feature a Clear Chan logo or JCDecaus. Q match?

 

It's def Clear Chan. Even spells out the name CLEAR CHANNEL in the Q pic. The bracket pictured in Q black box pic matches the CLEAR CHANNEL bus stops' construction.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 6:33 a.m. No.10241219   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1374 >>9820 >>3717

>>10241035

Yes, now I remember this was mentioned last bread I think. Okay, but what if they just forgot to change the sticker or stickers on all of the bus shelters after Decaux took over the contract? My point is that I think, since we can't prove anything that way, we can only rely on Street View to tell us when those different stickers on the black box appeared and were removed. Another point: From the point of immediate ownership of the bus shelter contract, how long would it take for Decaux to remove all of the Clear Channel bus shelters? I don't know the answer yet, but DID Decaux remove all, if any, of the Clear Channel bus shelters? Here is an important question: If we get a pic of a Decaux bus stop, we need to see if the brackets for the benches are the same as the Clear Channel benches. If different, rule them out. If same, then it's only a maybe, given that just because they should have removed the previous owner's permit tag, doesn't prove it happened. And so, I can only go by StreetView. Unless convinced otherwise. Convince me. All I care about is THAT bus shelter and if either the stickers on the black box appeared, were defaced or removed. All we can rely on is SV for that evidence imho.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 11:35 a.m. No.10243702   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3714

>>10243301

Anon, I am that same anon who said months ago we might not agree on everything but can agree on the facts presented in the pics.

Was kinda giving you a hard time, taking a different tack of argument, but still encouraging dialogue.

I just finished re-reading the bread in General where anons found the box and bus shelter. Same shills there as here.

Here is a link if you have time:

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/10221127.html#10221503

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 12:33 p.m. No.10244252   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6181

>>10243701

Anon, have you got a logo for Decaux for comparison? Am confused as to why they might post their (Decaux) sticker and only remove Q's sticker, leaving in place the tagger's slap tag and remnant of the sticker over which Q had placed their sticker.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 12:51 p.m. No.10244414   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6138

>>10243587

>Compare the SV JUL 2019 with the following. SV JAN 2018 and APR 2018.

Your second SV pic says APR 2019.

This would be fine in timeline. So, we are still saying, I am not sure, that Q posted after JAN 2018? Sorry, if not getting it at first read. Tired anon here. What do you think, at the moment, our current bookends on the Q pic are?

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 2:02 p.m. No.10245192   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5225 >>9820 >>3717

>>10243301

>SV JUL 2019

Anon, sorry I have looked above and can't find that one. Also, am posting one we might have forgotten from last bread of SV SEP 2019, which, imo, seems to show more clearly a CLEAR CHANNEL sticker.

Maybe those others preceding it were just suffering from poor camera angle and res?

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 2:46 p.m. No.10245618   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9117 >>6325

>>10241405

>Mcstain was courier for "the dirty dossier" or several, (there's more than one)

RELEVANT

2015/2016

Had to be to kick off "FISA"

it was debated at the time as to wether it was him in one of the bus pics piccadilly circus

 

You know, Anon, you have touched on the very reason why we here are giving ALL of the LONDON PICS a thorough second look.

We know No-Name collected his version of the dossier as Opposition Research against Trump. Butโ€ฆTrump did not announce his intentions to run for President until, earliest, January 2015. I have thought too, that No-name could be one of the pedestrians in the Embankment pics. But if it is No-Name, what was he doing in the Winter of 2013/2014? Same thing about aLisa Oage or Stzrok. If it's them in any of those LONDON PICS, what were they doing? Trump would not announce his presidential bid for another 2 years. Anons ask us why we bother looking into this. That's why. We are trying to find out what really is going on in those pics.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 8:35 p.m. No.10249283   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9320 >>9484 >>0927

>>10248884

Got to admit this ape is confused and frustrated with the black box/obelisk.) (pic related. My sense of humor.) Been going back and forth just to get the DACAUX tag explained. But let's start from scratch:

CC = 1

Sticker directly below CC= 2 (appears when?)

Tagger's askew slap tag = 3 (appears when?)

White sticker below CC (partially removed when?)

Unknown www.(something) sticker = 4 (appears shortly? before Q sticker, and removed just? before Q sticker? I have a theory that the defacing of the www.something may have been done by Q so as not to doxx the innocent)

Q sticker = 5 (appears when?)

 

Now for the sequential? removal of the tagsโ€ฆAre we ready to start sequencing?

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 9:01 p.m. No.10249476   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9499 >>9633

>>10249117

Add maybe Arab Spring? Libya, arms sales, Benghazi? Isis. Money to be made.

 

Above, I said that Trump did not speak with anyone in the open about running for office, BUTโ€ฆthere is way the Deep State might have known about Trump's PRIVATE conversations with people about running for office. He didn't just wake up one day and start asking how he might run a campaign in JANUARY 2015. He had telephone calls and maybe emails. Bill Binney alluded to the Deep State spying on "potential" candidates in an interview about HAMMR(sp?) and how it could be misused to spy on potential political rivals. Brennan. So yes, those who were in control at the time, and with the ability to do so, may have been getting a dossier ready for the one candidate they WANTED to run for POTUS- before he announced.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 10, 2020, 9:22 p.m. No.10249633   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9704

>>10249476 (me)

PS: I believe it was Newt Gingrich that POTUS approached in January of 2015 about how to run a campaign for the Presidency. (Am not throwing any suspicion on Gingrich whatsoever.) Saw that in an interview of Gingrich. Couldn't remember his name as I was typing post above.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 12, 2020, 8:44 a.m. No.10263303   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10261170

It is a tagger. May not even be local. The circle over the name like a halo is a crown. It's meaning is that the tagger has gone "all city" or citywide. A kind of king if the city. Should have saved sauce for that. But who in their right mind would think it nec to keep sauce on that.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 12, 2020, 5:59 p.m. No.10268656   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9235

>>10268062

>If stickers go on and are scraped off, a few times, I suppose it may be a telltale sign of หฎother great writers tend to slash out self-proclaimed kings who have not gained that rank yet in their eyesหฎ as per the write-up in wikipedia. Pic related.

Actually, there is probably stronger evidence to support a tagger" doctrine (unlike gang graffiti which marks territory and the "disses" and threats done by rival gangmembers crossing out rivals' graffiti) which leans more toward respect of other taggers' tags. A kind of Golden Rule. The exception, you have noted MIGHT occur, as stated, if the tagger has been deemed unworthy of the "crown". In this case- consider the evidence before you. The tagger's "slap tag" thrown up OCT2015 remained UNTOUCHED (and to further observe, with no rival tag appearing) until all the stickers were removed QUITE SOME TIME later. Logic would indicate our tagger had no one disturbing his tag until a company clean up crew removed all unauthorized stickers together.

I had read of this phenom among the slap tag variety of taggers- not covering another's slap tag. But again, did not expect to need sauce. These types of taggers actually tend to respect and appreciate each others' tags.

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 12, 2020, 7:41 p.m. No.10269574   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9652 >>9820 >>9968 >>2079 >>3568 >>3717

>>10268152

>the Q black box pic was taken between the SV 2018 JAN and the Vid 2018 DEC.

 

Too bad. Our worst time frame. Eleven months. Nevertheless, anons could list some possible Q opportunities to be in London. Or even more specifically, for team POTUS to be in that neighborhood. To bring UK to heel in their dealings re Iran nuke decommissioning? To use a mystery sleuth's method, we should consider Q's MOTIVE and OPPORTUNITY for being a) in London and b) across the street from the NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING AGENCY (as part of a US delegation maybe?) Should we remind ourselves of the question, WHAT IS Q CLEARANCE?

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 12, 2020, 8:22 p.m. No.10269911   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7565 >>7307

>>10269235

>Significance of leaving the slap tag alone but covering another sticker with #QANON? It could have been placed over another vaccant or previously scratched spot on the box. Yet #QANON was placed over another sticker without maligning the CC sticker nor the slap tag. Might it have signified a counter-move? Comms. Or just a coincidence.

 

The sticker (actually personal advert most likely) that Q covered up, may have been an act of discretion on Q's part. There appears to be a picture and a related www.(something) on the sticker in question. My theory is that Q (being a good guy) did not want to doxx this innocent "advertiser", and so covered the image and defaced the www.(something) address as well. A necessary act,

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 12, 2020, 8:52 p.m. No.10270152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0742 >>0949

>>10269968

Dialogue from a TV court drama series: "Objection, Your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence."

 

Would need to see pic evidence of moving Q sticker. Yes, I did theorize on why Q might cover someone's private ad which had a photo and www.(something) address, but my theory is based on a picture of the Q sticker covering another sticker. I don't know about a moving Q sticker and comms.

Facts (assumed) not in evidence. imho

Anonymous ID: c74d11 Aug. 13, 2020, 8:14 p.m. No.10281196   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3251

>>10278687

>During the tube strike of 2014 old buses were bought back into use. Starting Feb 2014.

Thank you, Anon! I had not been aware of that strike. That fits nicely within our current timeframe estimate for the Red bus/Piccadilly pics The LG G2 phone ads (in Piccadilly billboard) began October 2013. And the ticket kiosk added in Spring 2014. All, along with your added info help to confirm.