I have been thinking about how POTUS and Mattis are moving so many military assets into the Middle East since the "chemical attack" and how Q said that they were going to be taking care of Iran. If they were to have intelligence linking Iran or Iranian backed groups to the "chemical attack" do you think they would send assets into the region to go after Iran and not Syria? POTUS never telegraphs his future moves AND never said where they were going to be sending missiles. Could they be moving their pieces on the board to the Middle East under the guise of going after Syria but actually doing so to go after Iran? If the Iranians knew they were sending them to the region for them it would be ALOT harder to get the ships into place without having problems. But if the Iranians didn't know, they wouldn't be trying to stop them. It is one of the only ways that I can see them being able to move that many pieces into place to after Iran without firing a shot. It would also be easier to go negotiate with the Iranians once they are already surrounded because they are starting at a weak position. I included some pictures that show the range of the Tomahawk missiles that are on some of the ships they are moving into place. They also have aircraft and other assets that they would be able to use as well. If they were going after Syria, why would they be moving a Ohio class submarine there? Nothing there would need that kind of fire power. Between all the ships and sub there is 100's of missiles. Something just doesn't add up.
http:// www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5611419/Trumps-armada-Huge-task-force-12-warships-sets-sail-Syria.html