Q said connect the dots
Q also said this is not for everyone
“We the people need to research together” Why?
Because the origin and nature of humanity has been one of the best kept secrets of all time.
For centuries the Church taught that every word of the Bible is literally and factually correct. Many still believe that today. Yet that belief does not withstand much scrutiny. Among other things the flat earth model is described in the Bible. This was considered a description of the earth. Does that withstand modern scrutiny? Most would say absoluely not.
The primary scholarly method of Bible study is EXEGESIS. This is the practice of examining the Bible together with all related disciplines - history, archeology, languages, and so on. Approached in this way one soon discovers that the Bible was written by humans - divinely inspired certainly, but written by humans.
A famour scholar (Mauro Biglino) was hired by the Vatican to translate the books of thr OT as accurately and literally as possible. When he had finished the first 3 books the Vatican panicked and cancelled the project - sealing away the new translations.
For Biglino had changed the Creation story. His translation was that "Man was created from the "material of Gods" not in "the image of God.' The implication was that man was a product of genetic design using the "material" (genes) of the "Gods". That and many other specifics led Biglino to scholar Zechariah Stichin's works.
Stitchin's translation of Sumerian tablets which pre-date the Hebrew Bible are the basis of a series of well known books starting with "The 12th Planet." When you read the accounts in the tablets it exactly matches Biglio's translations and confirm that man was "created' by the genetic engineering of an alien race known as the Annunaki, which translates as "Royal Blood",
In addition, the translations also make it clear that the many "miraculous" encounters between Hebrews and Yahweh described in the Bible are in fact real interactions with the Annunaki "lords." In particular the accounts of "chariots of the gods" and other detailed descriptions by Bible Prophets exactly match the events described in the tablets. So it tuns out that in many respects the Bible was even more literally accurate than anyone imagined.
One key fact is that Sumerian artifacts prove that they had knowledge of the solar system that would have been impossible to learn without a telescope. The Sumerians give credit to their Lords and Gods, the Annunaki. The tablets describe the origins of the earth and human beings in detail. They state that the world was formed in a collision between heavenly bodies, creating a fragment that is the earth. The earth was then colonised by the Annunaki as a source of raw materials. In effect the earth was then a controlled and exploited habitat - just as it is today.
The Annunaki home world was known as Nibaru. The location of Nibaru is a mystery. Stichin believed it was on an elongated orbit which brought it close to Earth every 6,000 years. However, it appears it might be closer but not visible from Earth.
When labor was short, local homonids were pressed into service, but were inadequate. A long series of trial genetic breeding to improve the worker/slaves failed - until one scientist dared to include some of the Annunki genes in the pool - thus "creating" man.
If one reviews the story of Adam and Eve with medical procedures in view, the story suddenly becomes quite literal and realistic. Their "Fall from Grace" and expulsion from the Garden of Eden is another case in point. The story as written portrays a very unreasonable God indeed. Eve wanted knowledge and persuaded Adam to partake. God then sends them into eternal exile, suffering and conflict.
Traditional interpretations make extreme efforts to justify this story. Original sin and eventual redemption are the central themes. However, if one considers that humans were created "from the material (genetic) of the Lords (Annunaki) the story is quite rational and relevant to every day experience. (Sin and redemption, however, were to be a theme that also had real and practical meaning.)